The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education

Vanessa Svihla, Susannah C. Davis, Nadia N. Kellam
{"title":"The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education","authors":"Vanessa Svihla, Susannah C. Davis, Nadia N. Kellam","doi":"10.21061/see.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite many calls for change, and especially change aligned to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) goals, engineering continues to show disparities in the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of women and people from groups historically marginalized in these fields. In response, institutions have traditionally used change frameworks to both understand and create reform at program, department, or college levels. However, when aiming at DEIJ goals, change frameworks alone do not lead to the desired transformations of systems. Purpose: In this theoretical paper, we develop an integrated framework that draws from three theoretical domains to guide systemic, equity-focused transformation in engineering education. We argue knowledge from three domains—intersectional power, learning, and change—is necessary to account for and address the complexity of DEIJ change projects. This complexity requires a framework that sheds light on interrelated embodiments of power relations, guidance on how to change, including how and why people learn and engage in new practices. Scope: To illustrate the need for and value of such integration, we examine how prior researchers have used theories of power, change, and learning. In doing so, we present a framework for how integration across these domains can occur. In the domain of change, we identified papers on diffusion of innovations and communities of practice. In learning, we identified papers on distributed practice and legitimate peripheral participation. We examined how these papers utilized critical theories of intersectional power, the third domain, in tandem with these theories. We also explored how the choice of a theory (within the domains) can help or hinder the attainment of systematic, equity-focused transformation. Discussion/Conclusion: We drew the three domains together to consider how these, when integrated in the Theories and Research on Intersectional Power, Learning, and Evolutionary Change (TRIPLE Change) Framework, provide a more comprehensive means to envision, guide, and characterize DEIJ change efforts. By integrating learning, change, and intersectional power theories, we increase the capacity of our analyses of systems and open new possibilities for creating more equitable and just systems.","PeriodicalId":117277,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Engineering Education","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/see.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite many calls for change, and especially change aligned to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) goals, engineering continues to show disparities in the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of women and people from groups historically marginalized in these fields. In response, institutions have traditionally used change frameworks to both understand and create reform at program, department, or college levels. However, when aiming at DEIJ goals, change frameworks alone do not lead to the desired transformations of systems. Purpose: In this theoretical paper, we develop an integrated framework that draws from three theoretical domains to guide systemic, equity-focused transformation in engineering education. We argue knowledge from three domains—intersectional power, learning, and change—is necessary to account for and address the complexity of DEIJ change projects. This complexity requires a framework that sheds light on interrelated embodiments of power relations, guidance on how to change, including how and why people learn and engage in new practices. Scope: To illustrate the need for and value of such integration, we examine how prior researchers have used theories of power, change, and learning. In doing so, we present a framework for how integration across these domains can occur. In the domain of change, we identified papers on diffusion of innovations and communities of practice. In learning, we identified papers on distributed practice and legitimate peripheral participation. We examined how these papers utilized critical theories of intersectional power, the third domain, in tandem with these theories. We also explored how the choice of a theory (within the domains) can help or hinder the attainment of systematic, equity-focused transformation. Discussion/Conclusion: We drew the three domains together to consider how these, when integrated in the Theories and Research on Intersectional Power, Learning, and Evolutionary Change (TRIPLE Change) Framework, provide a more comprehensive means to envision, guide, and characterize DEIJ change efforts. By integrating learning, change, and intersectional power theories, we increase the capacity of our analyses of systems and open new possibilities for creating more equitable and just systems.
三重变革框架:融合交叉力量、学习和变革理论,以实现公正、公平、多样化和包容性的工程教育
背景:尽管许多人呼吁变革,特别是与多样性、公平、包容和正义(DEIJ)目标相一致的变革,但工程领域在机会、经验和成果方面,女性和历史上被边缘化群体的人仍然存在差距。作为回应,机构传统上使用变革框架来理解和创造项目、部门或学院层面的改革。然而,当以DEIJ目标为目标时,仅更改框架并不能导致期望的系统转换。目的:在这篇理论论文中,我们从三个理论领域开发了一个综合框架,以指导工程教育中系统的、以公平为中心的转型。我们认为,来自三个领域的知识——交叉力量、学习和变革——对于解释和解决DEIJ变革项目的复杂性是必要的。这种复杂性需要一个框架来阐明权力关系的相互关联的体现,指导如何改变,包括人们如何以及为什么学习和参与新的实践。范围:为了说明这种整合的必要性和价值,我们研究了以前的研究人员是如何使用权力、变化和学习理论的。在此过程中,我们提出了一个框架,说明如何实现跨这些领域的集成。在变革领域,我们确定了关于创新扩散和实践社区的论文。在学习方面,我们确定了关于分布式实践和合法外围参与的论文。我们研究了这些论文是如何利用交叉权力的批判理论的,这是第三个领域,与这些理论相结合。我们还探讨了理论的选择(在领域内)如何帮助或阻碍实现系统的、以股权为中心的转型。讨论/结论:我们将这三个领域结合在一起,考虑如何将它们整合到“交叉权力、学习和进化变革(TRIPLE Change)框架的理论与研究”中,为设想、指导和描述DEIJ变革工作提供更全面的方法。通过整合学习、变革和交叉权力理论,我们提高了系统分析的能力,并为创造更公平和公正的系统开辟了新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信