Network connectedness and portfolio hedging of green bonds, stock markets and commodities

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Taicir Mezghani, Fatma Ben Hamadou, Mouna Boujelbène-Abbes
{"title":"Network connectedness and portfolio hedging of green bonds, stock markets and commodities","authors":"Taicir Mezghani, Fatma Ben Hamadou, Mouna Boujelbène-Abbes","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-02-2023-0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the time-frequency connectedness between green bonds, stock markets and commodities (Brent and Gold), with a particular focus on China and its implication for portfolio diversification across different frequencies. Design/methodology/approach To this end, the authors implement the frequency connectedness approach of Barunik and Krehlik (2018), followed by the network connectedness before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. In particular, the authors implement more involvement in portfolio allocation and risk management by estimating hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness for green bonds and other financial assets. Findings The time-frequency domain spillover results show that gold is the net transmitter of shocks to green bonds in the long run, whereas green Bonds are the net recipients of shocks, irrespective of time horizons. The subsample analysis for the pandemic crisis period shows that green bonds dominate the network connectedness dynamic, mainly because it is strongly connected with the SP500 index and China (SSE). Thus, green bonds may serve as a potential diversifier asset at different time horizons. Likewise, the authors empirically confirm that green bonds have sizeable diversification benefits and hedges for investors towards stock markets and commodity stock pairs before and during the COVID-19 outbreak for both the short and long term. Gold only offers diversification gains in the long run, while Brent does not provide the desired diversification gains. Thus, the study highlights that green bonds are only an effective diversified. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by improving the understanding of the interconnectedness and hedging opportunities in short- and long-term horizons between green bonds, commodities and equity markets during the COVID-19 pandemic shock, with a particular focus on China. This study's findings provide more implications regarding portfolio allocation and risk management by estimating hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-02-2023-0160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the time-frequency connectedness between green bonds, stock markets and commodities (Brent and Gold), with a particular focus on China and its implication for portfolio diversification across different frequencies. Design/methodology/approach To this end, the authors implement the frequency connectedness approach of Barunik and Krehlik (2018), followed by the network connectedness before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. In particular, the authors implement more involvement in portfolio allocation and risk management by estimating hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness for green bonds and other financial assets. Findings The time-frequency domain spillover results show that gold is the net transmitter of shocks to green bonds in the long run, whereas green Bonds are the net recipients of shocks, irrespective of time horizons. The subsample analysis for the pandemic crisis period shows that green bonds dominate the network connectedness dynamic, mainly because it is strongly connected with the SP500 index and China (SSE). Thus, green bonds may serve as a potential diversifier asset at different time horizons. Likewise, the authors empirically confirm that green bonds have sizeable diversification benefits and hedges for investors towards stock markets and commodity stock pairs before and during the COVID-19 outbreak for both the short and long term. Gold only offers diversification gains in the long run, while Brent does not provide the desired diversification gains. Thus, the study highlights that green bonds are only an effective diversified. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by improving the understanding of the interconnectedness and hedging opportunities in short- and long-term horizons between green bonds, commodities and equity markets during the COVID-19 pandemic shock, with a particular focus on China. This study's findings provide more implications regarding portfolio allocation and risk management by estimating hedge ratios and hedging effectiveness.
绿色债券、股票市场和大宗商品的网络连通性和投资组合对冲
本研究旨在探讨COVID-19大流行对绿色债券、股票市场和大宗商品(布伦特和黄金)之间时频连通性的影响,特别关注中国及其对不同频率投资组合多样化的影响。为此,作者采用了Barunik和Krehlik(2018)的频率连通性方法,然后是COVID-19爆发前和期间的网络连通性。特别是,作者通过估计绿色债券和其他金融资产的对冲比率和对冲有效性,更多地参与投资组合配置和风险管理。时频域溢出结果表明,从长期来看,黄金是绿色债券冲击的净传播者,而绿色债券则是冲击的净接受者,无论时间跨度如何。大流行危机时期的子样本分析表明,绿色债券主导了网络连通性动态,主要是因为它与标准普尔500指数和中国(SSE)密切相关。因此,绿色债券可以在不同的时间范围内作为潜在的多元化资产。同样,作者从经验上证实,绿色债券对投资者在COVID-19爆发之前和期间的股票市场和大宗商品股票对具有相当大的多元化效益和对冲作用,无论是短期还是长期。从长期来看,黄金只能提供多样化收益,而布伦特原油则不能提供理想的多样化收益。因此,研究强调绿色债券只是一种有效的多元化。本研究对现有文献做出了贡献,提高了对2019冠状病毒病大流行冲击期间绿色债券、大宗商品和股票市场之间的相互联系以及短期和长期对冲机会的理解,并特别关注中国。本研究的研究结果通过估算对冲比率和对冲有效性,为投资组合配置和风险管理提供了更多的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信