MARY SHELLEY’NİN MATHILDA ADLI ESERİNİN EKOFEMİNİST ANALİZİ: KENDİ TABU KURGUSUNU YAZAN KADIN ANLATICI

Tuğba KARABULUT
{"title":"MARY SHELLEY’NİN MATHILDA ADLI ESERİNİN EKOFEMİNİST ANALİZİ: KENDİ TABU KURGUSUNU YAZAN KADIN ANLATICI","authors":"Tuğba KARABULUT","doi":"10.16953/deusosbil.1260838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Re-reading Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s novelette, Mathilda, in the twenty-first century from an ecofeminist perspective sheds a new light on contemporary criticism, opening up multifaceted perspectives. There was a critical moment in British literary history when Elizabeth Nitchie transcribed Mathilda from the microfilm of the manuscript and published it in 1959, which unveiled this piece of revolutionary taboo fiction suppressed for over a century by the author’s male relatives, chiefly Shelley’s father, William Godwin. Written in 1819-1820, Mathilda is the only work completed during Shelley’s lifetime. It is an artfully crafted epistolary work depicting the traumatic confessions and suicidal tendencies of the protagonist, Mathilda, a woman who isolated herself from society by integrating herself with nature due to her father’s confession for his incestuous passion towards her. Regarded as an underrated work, Mathilda has often been interpreted from biographical and incest-related perspectives by literary critics, which relegates its literary merits although it is in accordance with feminist and ecological theories and feminine writing. This paper, avoiding biographical accounts and the author’s life experiences and with theories consistent with those of ecofeminism, intends to show how nature functions as an effective instrument for the female writer to fictionalize her taboo story. By blending ecofeminism with feminine writing, this paper also investigates the interplay between woman and nature, and navigates how a female character courageously relocates her taboo story on a textual level from a feminist perspective in a natural setting, challenging the male-dominant Romantic tradition of the nineteenth century.","PeriodicalId":30201,"journal":{"name":"Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1260838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Re-reading Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s novelette, Mathilda, in the twenty-first century from an ecofeminist perspective sheds a new light on contemporary criticism, opening up multifaceted perspectives. There was a critical moment in British literary history when Elizabeth Nitchie transcribed Mathilda from the microfilm of the manuscript and published it in 1959, which unveiled this piece of revolutionary taboo fiction suppressed for over a century by the author’s male relatives, chiefly Shelley’s father, William Godwin. Written in 1819-1820, Mathilda is the only work completed during Shelley’s lifetime. It is an artfully crafted epistolary work depicting the traumatic confessions and suicidal tendencies of the protagonist, Mathilda, a woman who isolated herself from society by integrating herself with nature due to her father’s confession for his incestuous passion towards her. Regarded as an underrated work, Mathilda has often been interpreted from biographical and incest-related perspectives by literary critics, which relegates its literary merits although it is in accordance with feminist and ecological theories and feminine writing. This paper, avoiding biographical accounts and the author’s life experiences and with theories consistent with those of ecofeminism, intends to show how nature functions as an effective instrument for the female writer to fictionalize her taboo story. By blending ecofeminism with feminine writing, this paper also investigates the interplay between woman and nature, and navigates how a female character courageously relocates her taboo story on a textual level from a feminist perspective in a natural setting, challenging the male-dominant Romantic tradition of the nineteenth century.
玛丽-谢利的《马希尔达》的生态女性主义分析:自己写禁忌小说的女性叙述者
在二十一世纪,从生态女性主义的角度重读玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特·雪莱的中篇小说《玛蒂尔达》,为当代批评提供了新的视角,开辟了多方面的视角。1959年,伊丽莎白·尼奇(Elizabeth Nitchie)从手稿的缩微胶片中抄录了《玛蒂尔达》(Mathilda),并将其出版,这是英国文学史上的一个关键时刻。这部革命性的禁忌小说被作者的男性亲属,主要是雪莱的父亲威廉·戈德温(William Godwin)压制了一个多世纪。《玛蒂尔达》写于1819-1820年,是雪莱一生中完成的唯一一部作品。这是一部精心制作的书信体作品,描绘了主人公玛蒂尔达的创伤忏悔和自杀倾向。玛蒂尔达是一个女人,由于她父亲对她的乱伦激情的忏悔,她将自己与社会隔离开来,融入自然。《玛蒂尔达》是一部被低估的作品,文学评论家往往从传记和乱伦的角度来解读它,这降低了它的文学价值,尽管它符合女权主义和生态理论以及女性写作。本文避开传记叙述和作者的生活经历,以符合生态女性主义的理论,试图揭示自然如何成为女作家虚构禁忌故事的有效工具。通过将生态女性主义与女性写作相结合,探讨了女性与自然的相互作用,以及女性角色如何在自然环境中,从女性主义的角度,勇敢地在文本层面上重新定位她的禁忌故事,挑战十九世纪男性主导的浪漫主义传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信