Stone-tool assemblage of the Eneolithic settlement of Tolum-1 in the Konda River Basin

Q3 Arts and Humanities
M.V. Khramcov, N.M. Chairkina, E.N. Dubovtseva, S.A. Myznikov
{"title":"Stone-tool assemblage of the Eneolithic settlement of Tolum-1 in the Konda River Basin","authors":"M.V. Khramcov, N.M. Chairkina, E.N. Dubovtseva, S.A. Myznikov","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, the expedition of Poengurr and the Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of RAS investigated the settlement of Tolum-1, which functioned during the Neolithic, Eneolithic, Bronze and Early Iron Ages. The site is located in the north of Western Siberia, in Kondinsky District of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Ok-rug — Yugra. Structure (dwelling) No. 3 containing a complex of stone tools and pottery of the Enyi type, as well as the adjoint area, were investigated by an excavation trench of an area of 499 m2. On the settlement, 108 stone items were found, the large part of which concentrates within the boundaries of dwelling No. 3. The research is based upon the method of technical and typological analysis of stone-tool assemblage, implying the development of a typology of stone tools and the study of their production technology taking into account the quality of the or-namental raw materials used by the ancient population. According to the raw-material composition of the stone-tool assemblage, mainly represented by soft rocks (grey-green slate, burgundy schist, etc.) and, to a lesser ex-tent, by flint of various colors, quartz and quartzite, the ancient population of this region did not have continuous sources of high-quality ornamental raw materials. Prevailing on the settlement are the tools for woodworking (drillbit-shaped tools, adzes, chisels), and also found were knives and a representative collection of arrowheads. Items for stone processing are few: a hammer-stone, a retoucher, and two cores. There is a higher presence of unprocessed pebbles and tiles, and chips and fragments of polished products. The main technological chain on the site was production of polished tools from local gray-green slate by chipping off and subsequent grinding. The production of flint tools by splitting and retouching was insignificant. The stone assemblage of the Tolum-1 settle-ment finds analogies in the complexes of the Enyi type of the north of Western Siberia. Certain categories and types of products are more widespread — double-sided retouched fish-shaped arrowheads are found in quantity in the Trans-Urals, polished leaf-shaped arrowheads with a groove — in the Eneolithic sites of the north of Wes-tern Siberia, while polished arrowheads with a tapered truncated base were found among the Eneolithic materials of the Surgut Ob Basin and on the sites with the Ushya ceramics of the Neolithic Period of the Konda lowland. Polished rounded and teardrop-shaped pendants are found in the funerary and, to a lesser extent, settlement complexes of the Trans-Urals and Western Siberia in the Late Neolithic — Eneolithic. A series of radiocarbon dates obtained for the settlement of Tolum-1 and other sites of the Enyi type in the north of Western Siberia, as well as the technical and technological characteristics and morphology of the stone inventory of the settlement under consideration, and a wide range of analogies leave open the possibility of attributing the structure No. 3 to the Eneolithic Period, within the span of the calibrated dates in the interval of 3600–2600 BC.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2023-62-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, the expedition of Poengurr and the Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of RAS investigated the settlement of Tolum-1, which functioned during the Neolithic, Eneolithic, Bronze and Early Iron Ages. The site is located in the north of Western Siberia, in Kondinsky District of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Ok-rug — Yugra. Structure (dwelling) No. 3 containing a complex of stone tools and pottery of the Enyi type, as well as the adjoint area, were investigated by an excavation trench of an area of 499 m2. On the settlement, 108 stone items were found, the large part of which concentrates within the boundaries of dwelling No. 3. The research is based upon the method of technical and typological analysis of stone-tool assemblage, implying the development of a typology of stone tools and the study of their production technology taking into account the quality of the or-namental raw materials used by the ancient population. According to the raw-material composition of the stone-tool assemblage, mainly represented by soft rocks (grey-green slate, burgundy schist, etc.) and, to a lesser ex-tent, by flint of various colors, quartz and quartzite, the ancient population of this region did not have continuous sources of high-quality ornamental raw materials. Prevailing on the settlement are the tools for woodworking (drillbit-shaped tools, adzes, chisels), and also found were knives and a representative collection of arrowheads. Items for stone processing are few: a hammer-stone, a retoucher, and two cores. There is a higher presence of unprocessed pebbles and tiles, and chips and fragments of polished products. The main technological chain on the site was production of polished tools from local gray-green slate by chipping off and subsequent grinding. The production of flint tools by splitting and retouching was insignificant. The stone assemblage of the Tolum-1 settle-ment finds analogies in the complexes of the Enyi type of the north of Western Siberia. Certain categories and types of products are more widespread — double-sided retouched fish-shaped arrowheads are found in quantity in the Trans-Urals, polished leaf-shaped arrowheads with a groove — in the Eneolithic sites of the north of Wes-tern Siberia, while polished arrowheads with a tapered truncated base were found among the Eneolithic materials of the Surgut Ob Basin and on the sites with the Ushya ceramics of the Neolithic Period of the Konda lowland. Polished rounded and teardrop-shaped pendants are found in the funerary and, to a lesser extent, settlement complexes of the Trans-Urals and Western Siberia in the Late Neolithic — Eneolithic. A series of radiocarbon dates obtained for the settlement of Tolum-1 and other sites of the Enyi type in the north of Western Siberia, as well as the technical and technological characteristics and morphology of the stone inventory of the settlement under consideration, and a wide range of analogies leave open the possibility of attributing the structure No. 3 to the Eneolithic Period, within the span of the calibrated dates in the interval of 3600–2600 BC.
康达河流域新石器时代Tolum-1聚落的石器组合
2020年,Poengurr考察团和俄罗斯科学院乌拉尔分院历史考古研究所对新石器时代、新石器时代、青铜器时代和早期铁器时代的托勒姆-1聚落进行了考察。该基地位于西西伯利亚北部,位于Khanty-Mansi自治区Ok-rug - Yugra的Kondinsky区。3号结构(住宅)包含一个复杂的恩义型石器和陶器,以及伴随区域,通过一个面积为499平方米的挖掘沟进行了调查。在定居点,发现了108件石头物品,其中大部分集中在3号住宅的边界内。这项研究是基于石制工具组合的技术和类型学分析方法,这意味着石器类型学的发展和它们的生产技术的研究,同时考虑到古代人口使用的基本原材料的质量。从石器工具组合的原料组成来看,主要以软岩(灰绿色板岩、酒红色片岩等)为代表,其次为各种颜色的燧石、石英和石英岩,说明该地区古代人口没有持续的优质装饰原料来源。在定居地流行的是木工工具(钻头形状的工具、锛、凿子),还发现了刀具和有代表性的箭头。石材加工的项目很少:一个锤石,一个修图器和两个核心。未经加工的鹅卵石和瓷砖以及抛光产品的碎片和碎片的存在率较高。该基地的主要技术环节是利用当地的灰绿色石板,通过切割和研磨来生产抛光工具。通过分裂和修饰来生产燧石工具是微不足道的。Tolum-1聚落的石头组合在西西伯利亚北部的Enyi型复合体中发现了类似的东西。某些种类和类型的产品更为广泛——在外乌拉尔地区发现了大量经过修饰的双面鱼形箭头,在西伯利亚北部的新石器时代遗址发现了带有凹槽的抛光叶形箭头,而在苏尔古特鄂盆地的新石器时代材料和康达低地的新石器时代Ushya陶瓷遗址中发现了带有锥形底座的抛光箭头。抛光的圆形和泪滴形状的吊坠在新石器时代晚期-新石器时代的墓葬中被发现,在较小程度上,在跨乌拉尔和西伯利亚西部的定居点建筑群中也有发现。从Tolum-1和西西伯利亚北部其他恩尼类型遗址获得的一系列放射性碳测年,以及所考虑的定居点的技术和工艺特征和石头的形态,以及广泛的类推,使得在校准日期的范围内,将3号结构归因于新石器时代的可能性在公元前3600-2600年之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信