Playing games with QCA: The Banzhaf index as a context-sensitive measure of explanatory power in international management

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Claus-Jochen Haake, Martin R. Schneider
{"title":"Playing games with QCA: The Banzhaf index as a context-sensitive measure of explanatory power in international management","authors":"Claus-Jochen Haake,&nbsp;Martin R. Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) enables researchers in international management to better understand how the impact of a single explanatory factor depends on the context of other factors. But the analytical toolbox of QCA does not include a parameter for the explanatory power of a single explanatory factor or “condition”. In this paper, we therefore reinterpret the Banzhaf power index, originally developed in cooperative game theory, to establish a goodness-of-fit parameter in QCA. The relative Banzhaf index we suggest measures the explanatory power of one condition averaged across all sufficient combinations of conditions. The paper argues that the index is especially informative in three situations that are all salient in international management and call for a context-sensitive analysis of single conditions, namely substantial limited diversity in the data, the emergence of strong INUS conditions in the analysis, and theorizing with contingency factors. The paper derives the properties of the relative Banzhaf index in QCA, demonstrates how the index can be computed easily from a rudimentary truth table, and explores its insights by revisiting selected papers in international management that apply fuzzy-set QCA. It finally suggests a three-step procedure for utilizing the relative Banzhaf index when the causal structure involves both contingency effects and configurational causation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101065"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) enables researchers in international management to better understand how the impact of a single explanatory factor depends on the context of other factors. But the analytical toolbox of QCA does not include a parameter for the explanatory power of a single explanatory factor or “condition”. In this paper, we therefore reinterpret the Banzhaf power index, originally developed in cooperative game theory, to establish a goodness-of-fit parameter in QCA. The relative Banzhaf index we suggest measures the explanatory power of one condition averaged across all sufficient combinations of conditions. The paper argues that the index is especially informative in three situations that are all salient in international management and call for a context-sensitive analysis of single conditions, namely substantial limited diversity in the data, the emergence of strong INUS conditions in the analysis, and theorizing with contingency factors. The paper derives the properties of the relative Banzhaf index in QCA, demonstrates how the index can be computed easily from a rudimentary truth table, and explores its insights by revisiting selected papers in international management that apply fuzzy-set QCA. It finally suggests a three-step procedure for utilizing the relative Banzhaf index when the causal structure involves both contingency effects and configurational causation.

与 QCA 玩游戏:将 Banzhaf 指数作为衡量国际管理解释力的背景敏感指标
定性比较分析(QCA)使国际管理研究人员能够更好地了解单一解释因素的影响如何取决于其他因素的背景。但是,定性比较分析的分析工具箱中并不包括单一解释因素或 "条件 "的解释力参数。因此,我们在本文中重新解释了最初在合作博弈论中提出的班查夫力量指数,以建立 QCA 的拟合优度参数。我们提出的相对班扎夫指数衡量的是一个条件在所有充分条件组合中的平均解释力。本文认为,该指数在三种情况下尤其具有参考价值,这三种情况在国际管理中都很突出,需要对单一条件进行情境敏感分析,即数据的实质性有限多样性、分析中出现的强 INUS 条件以及用权变因素进行理论分析。本文推导了QCA中相对Banzhaf指数的特性,演示了如何从一个基本的真值表中轻松计算出该指数,并通过重温国际管理中应用模糊集QCA的部分论文来探讨其见解。最后,它提出了当因果结构涉及或然效应和构型因果关系时利用相对班扎夫指数的三步程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信