The Classical Canon and its Uses in Late Late Antiquity: 600–775 CE

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael W. Herren
{"title":"The Classical Canon and its Uses in Late Late Antiquity: 600–775 CE","authors":"Michael W. Herren","doi":"10.1353/jla.2023.a906776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This essay has two essential aims. The first is to provide an overview of classical Latin texts known in Western Europe ca. 600–ca. 775 ce. The second is to establish what classical works were favored and formed literary tastes and literary techniques. The survey concentrates on a few regions and several influential writers of late Late Antiquity. It draws evidence from dated manuscripts, book-lists, glossaries, and quotations to provide a rounded picture of the literary culture of western Europe in those years. Using the terms Old Canon (works written 200 bce–150 ce) and New Canon (works written 150–550 ce), evidence shows that few Old Canon works were copied or read in comparison to New Canon works. By contrast, some New Canon works were received in the seventh century and copied and commented in profusion from the late eighth century onwards. Although book production was determined chiefly by the principle of utility, selecting works essential to Bible study, reading tastes tell a different story. Some \"elite\" authors imbibed New Canon writings and imitated their techniques, including narrative structure, forgery, parody, and satire. The essay invites a re-evaluation of the literary culture of the years 600–ca. 775 ce.","PeriodicalId":16220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Late Antiquity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Late Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2023.a906776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This essay has two essential aims. The first is to provide an overview of classical Latin texts known in Western Europe ca. 600–ca. 775 ce. The second is to establish what classical works were favored and formed literary tastes and literary techniques. The survey concentrates on a few regions and several influential writers of late Late Antiquity. It draws evidence from dated manuscripts, book-lists, glossaries, and quotations to provide a rounded picture of the literary culture of western Europe in those years. Using the terms Old Canon (works written 200 bce–150 ce) and New Canon (works written 150–550 ce), evidence shows that few Old Canon works were copied or read in comparison to New Canon works. By contrast, some New Canon works were received in the seventh century and copied and commented in profusion from the late eighth century onwards. Although book production was determined chiefly by the principle of utility, selecting works essential to Bible study, reading tastes tell a different story. Some "elite" authors imbibed New Canon writings and imitated their techniques, including narrative structure, forgery, parody, and satire. The essay invites a re-evaluation of the literary culture of the years 600–ca. 775 ce.
古典正典及其在上古晚期的应用:公元600-775年
摘要:本文有两个主要目的。第一部分概述了西欧约600 -约600年的古典拉丁文文本。公元775年。二是确立受人喜爱的经典作品,形成文学趣味和文学技法。调查集中在几个地区和几个有影响力的作家晚古代。它从年代久远的手稿、书目、词汇表和引文中提取证据,为那些年西欧的文学文化提供了一个全面的图景。使用“旧正典”(写于公元前200年至150年的作品)和“新正典”(写于公元前150年至550年的作品)这两个术语,有证据表明,与“新正典”作品相比,很少有“旧正典”作品被复制或阅读。相比之下,一些新佳能作品在七世纪收到,并从八世纪后期开始大量复制和评论。虽然书籍的制作主要是由效用原则决定的,选择对圣经学习至关重要的作品,但阅读品味却讲述了不同的故事。一些“精英”作家吸收新佳能作品并模仿他们的技巧,包括叙事结构,伪造,模仿和讽刺。这篇文章引起了对公元600年文学文化的重新评价。公元775年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Late Antiquity
Journal of Late Antiquity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信