High flow nasal oxygen versus usual care in improving pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after an exacerbation - a pilot randomized controlled trial

IF 0.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yingjuan Mok, Jing Wen Foong, Hang Siang Wong, Amanda Soh, Shi Hua Tan, Poh Choo Tan, Bryan Peide Choo, Keith Keat Huat Wong
{"title":"High flow nasal oxygen versus usual care in improving pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after an exacerbation - a pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"Yingjuan Mok, Jing Wen Foong, Hang Siang Wong, Amanda Soh, Shi Hua Tan, Poh Choo Tan, Bryan Peide Choo, Keith Keat Huat Wong","doi":"10.1177/20101058231204705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is guideline-recommended for all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients post-hospitalization for COPD exacerbation but many patients experience difficulties participating in early PR due to significant breathlessness. High flow nasal oxygen (HFO) has been shown to improve ventilatory efficiency in stable COPD patients, but there is little data on HFO use during exercise training in PR post-COPD exacerbation. Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore the feasibility of a prospective large-scale RCT to evaluate the impact of HFO in improving PR outcomes of COPD patients post-exacerbation. Patients recently hospitalized for COPD exacerbation were enrolled and randomized to either HFO or usual care during an early 6-weeks, outpatient PR program. Results Twenty two patients were randomized between May 2019 to Dec 2019 and 18 patients completed the study. The HFO arm achieved a greater improvement in exercise capacity than the usual care arm, with the mean difference in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) being 30 m (95% CI: −23 m to 84 m), although this was not statistically significant. All 18 patients in both arms were compliant to the pulmonary rehabilitation program (defined by attending ≥75% of exercise sessions). HFO was well tolerated with no adverse events reported. Conclusion This pilot RCT has shown preliminary evidence of the feasibility and high patient acceptability of HFO during early PR on improving exercise capacity in COPD patients post-exacerbation These promising results would justify a larger RCT to confirm HFO’s benefits and has the potential to change PR practice.","PeriodicalId":44685,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20101058231204705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is guideline-recommended for all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients post-hospitalization for COPD exacerbation but many patients experience difficulties participating in early PR due to significant breathlessness. High flow nasal oxygen (HFO) has been shown to improve ventilatory efficiency in stable COPD patients, but there is little data on HFO use during exercise training in PR post-COPD exacerbation. Methods We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to explore the feasibility of a prospective large-scale RCT to evaluate the impact of HFO in improving PR outcomes of COPD patients post-exacerbation. Patients recently hospitalized for COPD exacerbation were enrolled and randomized to either HFO or usual care during an early 6-weeks, outpatient PR program. Results Twenty two patients were randomized between May 2019 to Dec 2019 and 18 patients completed the study. The HFO arm achieved a greater improvement in exercise capacity than the usual care arm, with the mean difference in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) being 30 m (95% CI: −23 m to 84 m), although this was not statistically significant. All 18 patients in both arms were compliant to the pulmonary rehabilitation program (defined by attending ≥75% of exercise sessions). HFO was well tolerated with no adverse events reported. Conclusion This pilot RCT has shown preliminary evidence of the feasibility and high patient acceptability of HFO during early PR on improving exercise capacity in COPD patients post-exacerbation These promising results would justify a larger RCT to confirm HFO’s benefits and has the potential to change PR practice.
高流量鼻吸氧与常规护理在改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者急性发作后肺康复结果中的作用——一项随机对照试验
早期肺康复(PR)是所有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者因COPD加重住院后的指南推荐,但许多患者由于明显的呼吸困难而难以参与早期PR。高流量鼻氧(HFO)已被证明可以提高稳定期COPD患者的通气效率,但在PR后COPD加重期运动训练中使用高流量鼻氧(HFO)的数据很少。方法我们进行了一项先导性随机对照试验(RCT),以探讨一项前瞻性大规模随机对照试验的可行性,以评估HFO对改善COPD患者急性加重后PR结果的影响。近期因慢性阻塞性肺病加重住院的患者被纳入研究,并在早期6周的门诊PR项目中随机接受HFO或常规治疗。结果2019年5月至2019年12月,22例患者被随机分配,18例患者完成了研究。与常规护理组相比,HFO组在运动能力方面取得了更大的改善,6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的平均差异为30米(95% CI: - 23米至84米),尽管这没有统计学意义。两组的所有18例患者均符合肺康复计划(定义为参加≥75%的运动课程)。HFO耐受性良好,无不良事件报道。结论:本试验RCT初步证明了在早期PR期间HFO对改善COPD患者急性加重后运动能力的可行性和高患者接受度。这些令人鼓舞的结果将证明更大规模的RCT可以证实HFO的益处,并有可能改变PR实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信