Analysis of Human Error Potential as a Cause of Work Accident using Sherpa and Heart Method in The Cement Industry

IF 2.1
Annisa Maulidya, Katharina Oginawati, Suharyanto Suharyanto
{"title":"Analysis of Human Error Potential as a Cause of Work Accident using Sherpa and Heart Method in The Cement Industry","authors":"Annisa Maulidya, Katharina Oginawati, Suharyanto Suharyanto","doi":"10.58344/jws.v2i9.408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to analyze the potential for human error that can cause workplace accidents in the cement industry of PT.X. The study was conducted by conducting observations, interviews, and distributing questionnaires in the mining area and production area. Questionnaires were distributed to 96 people who were mining heavy equipment operators and production operators. The research method used through Human Reliability Analysis with the Hierarchial Task Analysis (HTA) method, knowing the types of errors that occur using the SHERPA method, then calculating the probability of human errors that occur with the HEART method. Based on the results of research using the SHERPA method, the most common types of errors in mining areas and production areas are action errors (60,25%). The type of error that occurs is due to negligence in using personal protective equipment and the work process is not completed properly. Based on research using the HEART method, the greatest opportunity for human error in the mining department is cleaning with dozer with a value of 1,056 and in the production department is in the area of cleaning work with a value of 1,89. Based on the error producing conditions questionnaire (EPCs) for workers in the mining department the most common cause of error is poor equipment / instruments while for workers in the production department is a mismatch between the imagined risk and the actual risk. The recommendations given to companies are to improve work equipment, improve visual displays and provide an appropriate assessment checklist.","PeriodicalId":45058,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v2i9.408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the potential for human error that can cause workplace accidents in the cement industry of PT.X. The study was conducted by conducting observations, interviews, and distributing questionnaires in the mining area and production area. Questionnaires were distributed to 96 people who were mining heavy equipment operators and production operators. The research method used through Human Reliability Analysis with the Hierarchial Task Analysis (HTA) method, knowing the types of errors that occur using the SHERPA method, then calculating the probability of human errors that occur with the HEART method. Based on the results of research using the SHERPA method, the most common types of errors in mining areas and production areas are action errors (60,25%). The type of error that occurs is due to negligence in using personal protective equipment and the work process is not completed properly. Based on research using the HEART method, the greatest opportunity for human error in the mining department is cleaning with dozer with a value of 1,056 and in the production department is in the area of cleaning work with a value of 1,89. Based on the error producing conditions questionnaire (EPCs) for workers in the mining department the most common cause of error is poor equipment / instruments while for workers in the production department is a mismatch between the imagined risk and the actual risk. The recommendations given to companies are to improve work equipment, improve visual displays and provide an appropriate assessment checklist.
用夏尔巴法和心脏法分析水泥工业生产事故的人为失误隐患
本研究旨在分析PT.X水泥工业中可能导致工作场所事故的人为错误。本研究通过在矿区和生产区进行观察、访谈和发放问卷的方式进行。对96名矿山重型设备操作人员和生产操作人员进行了问卷调查。研究方法采用层次任务分析(HTA)方法进行人的可靠性分析,使用SHERPA方法了解发生的错误类型,然后使用HEART方法计算发生人为错误的概率。根据SHERPA方法的研究结果,矿区和生产区最常见的误差类型是动作误差(60,25%)。发生的错误类型是由于使用个人防护装备的疏忽和工作过程没有正确完成。根据使用HEART方法的研究,采矿部门的人为错误最大机会是使用推土机进行清理,其值为1,056,而生产部门的人为错误最大机会是在清理工作领域,其值为1,89。根据采矿部门工人的错误生产条件调查问卷(epc),最常见的错误原因是设备/仪器不佳,而对于生产部门的工人来说,是想象风险与实际风险之间的不匹配。给公司的建议是改善工作设备,改善视觉显示,并提供适当的评估清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development
World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信