Field archaeology and foreign assistance during the decade of development in Iran and Turkey

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Kyle Olson, Christina Luke
{"title":"Field archaeology and foreign assistance during the decade of development in Iran and Turkey","authors":"Kyle Olson, Christina Luke","doi":"10.1080/02757206.2023.2261972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDuring the 1960s, the scope of field archaeology in the Middle East transformed dramatically, driven by foreign aid funded dam-led regional development projects. The paradigm of river-basin salvage, intimately connected to dam projects first developed in the US Southeast during the Great Depression, was exported alongside the dam-building expertise, but with unanticipated results. Rather than creating a worldwide system of emergency archaeology to mitigate the threats posed to heritage by the global project of modernization, the Decade of Development resulted in archaeologists becoming consultants in irrigation, education, and finance – key prerequisites to the emergence of today’s dominant modalities of the linkage between archaeology and development centred on regulatory compliance fieldwork and the encouragement of cultural tourism.KEYWORDS: Archaeologydevelopmentdamsforeign aidtechnical assistance Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It should be noted that while many of these organizations, USAID in particular, presented their work as neutral or benevolent endeavors, there was always an embedded economic interest – what has recently been called ‘Aid for Profit’ (see Khastagir Citation2021) – insofar as they aimed to open new markets to American firms, whether as sources of raw materials and cheap labor, or as consumer bases for American-produced manufactured goods. This legacy has continued down to the present in many cases (see e.g., Attewell Citation2023; Norris Citation2021; Svitych Citation2023).2 ‘Concerning the Preservation of Cultural Property Endangered by Public or Private Works,’ 19 November 1968, https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-preservation-cultural-property-endangered-public-or-private-works; see also Meskell on this subject (Citation2018, 46).3 In Turkey, the salvage mandate was de facto established in 1993 but not de jure until the 2000s (Özdoğan and Eres Citation2016, 66–67) and in Iran in 1988 (Sardari Citation2016; Citation2021).4 The Unified Development of the Khuzestan Region, 28 Aug. 1958, [Seeley Mudd Manuscript Library, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library] P[apers of] D[avid E.] L[ilienthal], S[ubseries] 18C [1955–1958], box 409. https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog/MC148_c03234.5 ‘The Unified Development of the Khuzestan Region,’ 1–3.6 Donald Wilber to David E. Lilienthal, 1 December 1958, PDL S-18C, box 409.7 ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters, Oct 15, 1950-Mar 11, 1973: Robert McCormick Adams, Iran,’ 388–390, 30 January 1961. https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.8 Leo Anderson to Robert Braidwood, 30 July 1959, Directors Correspondence. Records. [Box 287, Folder 09], I[nstitute] [for the] S[tudy] [of] A[ncient] C[ultures] M[useum] A[rchives] at the U[niversity] of C[hicago].9 Robert McCormick Adams, 26 May 1994, Smithsonian Institution Archives Record Unit 9602, Oral History Interview https://youtu.be/t4C1T4SO52s?t=1861.10 Ibid.11 Robert McCormick Adams to Leo Anderson, 10 August 1959, D[irectors] C[orrespondence] R[ecords] Box 283, Folders 09 & 18, ISACMAUC.12 Robert McCormick Adams to Leo Anderson, 27 May 1960, DCR Box 287, Folders 09, ISACMAUC.13 ‘Observations on Near Eastern Research Policy at the University of Chicago’, n.d., P[ersonal] P[apers] [and] S[pecial] C[ollections] [in the] S[mithsonian] I[nstitution] A[rchives] Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 8, Folder ‘Oriental Institute – Miscellaneous, c. 1955–1984’ https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_229252.14 Robert McCormick Adams to ‘Ezzatollah Negahbān, 24 June 1960, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’15 Robert McCormick Adams to ‘Ezzatollah Negahbān, 2 September 1960, DCR Box 289, Folder 15, ISACMAUC.16 W.B. Harrell to Robert McCormick Adams, 27 September 1960, DCR Box 287, Folder 09, ISACMAUC.17 ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters, Oct 15, 1950-Mar 11, 1973: Robert McCormick Adams, Iran,’ 388–390, 30 January 1961. https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.18 ‘Preliminary Report on Ancient Settlements and Agriculture in the Upper Khuzestan Plains’, 14 October 1962, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’19 Robert McCormick Adams to Graham DuShane, 30 March 1961, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’20 Robert McCormick Adams to David E. Lilienthal, 5 March 1979, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’21 ‘‘Observations on Near Eastern research policy at the University of Chicago,’ PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 8, ‘Oriental Institute – Miscellaneous, c. 1955–1984.’22 W.A. Copeland to Froelich Rainey, 29 November 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 3, P[ahlavi] U[niversity] P[rojects] R[ecords] 1958–1966, U[niversity] [of] P[ennsylvania] A[rchives] [and] R[ecords] C[enter].23 Ibid.24 Ibid.25 W.A. Copeland to Murray Nicol, 10 June 1965, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.26 Murray Nicol to Torab Basiri 15 July 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 3, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.27 Ibid.28 Murray Nicol to Asadollah Alam, 19 February 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4 Folder 4, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.29 ‘News Release: Pahlavi University’s Dorudzan Expedition’, 25 June 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.30 Ibid.31 Murray, Nicol ‘Progress Report’, 14 March 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 4, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.32 Murray Nicol to W.A. Copeland 10 May 1967, UPB107 General Files Box 4 Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.33 Proudlove, J.A. 1969. ‘The Influence of town planning proposals on the cultural monuments in the historic cities of Tabriz, Qasvin, Ispahan and Shiraz: Iran – (mission) July 1969.’ https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000008815.34 Note also that Syria had rejected Point IV support and TVA consultants (Luke and Meskell Citation2019, 11, 13).35 Bedrettin Tuncel to René Maheu, 21 February 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.36 Mahdi Elmandjra to Bedrettin Tuncel, 9 July 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.37 Christophe, Louis. ‘Mission en Turquie 20–25 Octobre 1968’, 31 October 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.38 The Institute for the study of Ancient Cultures had by then long been active in eastern Anatolia, with expeditions led by Robert and Linda Braidwood, Hans Güterbock, and Maurits van Loon (see ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters,’ 2–8).39 Christophe, Louis. ‘Mission en Turquie 20–25 Octobre 1968,’ 31 October 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.40 Additional connections to Nubia included archaeologist James E. Knudstad and architect Horat Jarits. These chance encounters with Nubia veterans at Keban – both engineers and archaeologists – attest to the close ties within the regional networks of personnel forged along the Nile (Meskell and Luke Citation2021, 6; for an example of how engineers and archaeologists found themselves in conflict over the relative balance of conservation, research, and profit in such projects, see Meskell Citation2019, 12–15).","PeriodicalId":46201,"journal":{"name":"History and Anthropology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2023.2261972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTDuring the 1960s, the scope of field archaeology in the Middle East transformed dramatically, driven by foreign aid funded dam-led regional development projects. The paradigm of river-basin salvage, intimately connected to dam projects first developed in the US Southeast during the Great Depression, was exported alongside the dam-building expertise, but with unanticipated results. Rather than creating a worldwide system of emergency archaeology to mitigate the threats posed to heritage by the global project of modernization, the Decade of Development resulted in archaeologists becoming consultants in irrigation, education, and finance – key prerequisites to the emergence of today’s dominant modalities of the linkage between archaeology and development centred on regulatory compliance fieldwork and the encouragement of cultural tourism.KEYWORDS: Archaeologydevelopmentdamsforeign aidtechnical assistance Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It should be noted that while many of these organizations, USAID in particular, presented their work as neutral or benevolent endeavors, there was always an embedded economic interest – what has recently been called ‘Aid for Profit’ (see Khastagir Citation2021) – insofar as they aimed to open new markets to American firms, whether as sources of raw materials and cheap labor, or as consumer bases for American-produced manufactured goods. This legacy has continued down to the present in many cases (see e.g., Attewell Citation2023; Norris Citation2021; Svitych Citation2023).2 ‘Concerning the Preservation of Cultural Property Endangered by Public or Private Works,’ 19 November 1968, https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-preservation-cultural-property-endangered-public-or-private-works; see also Meskell on this subject (Citation2018, 46).3 In Turkey, the salvage mandate was de facto established in 1993 but not de jure until the 2000s (Özdoğan and Eres Citation2016, 66–67) and in Iran in 1988 (Sardari Citation2016; Citation2021).4 The Unified Development of the Khuzestan Region, 28 Aug. 1958, [Seeley Mudd Manuscript Library, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library] P[apers of] D[avid E.] L[ilienthal], S[ubseries] 18C [1955–1958], box 409. https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog/MC148_c03234.5 ‘The Unified Development of the Khuzestan Region,’ 1–3.6 Donald Wilber to David E. Lilienthal, 1 December 1958, PDL S-18C, box 409.7 ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters, Oct 15, 1950-Mar 11, 1973: Robert McCormick Adams, Iran,’ 388–390, 30 January 1961. https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.8 Leo Anderson to Robert Braidwood, 30 July 1959, Directors Correspondence. Records. [Box 287, Folder 09], I[nstitute] [for the] S[tudy] [of] A[ncient] C[ultures] M[useum] A[rchives] at the U[niversity] of C[hicago].9 Robert McCormick Adams, 26 May 1994, Smithsonian Institution Archives Record Unit 9602, Oral History Interview https://youtu.be/t4C1T4SO52s?t=1861.10 Ibid.11 Robert McCormick Adams to Leo Anderson, 10 August 1959, D[irectors] C[orrespondence] R[ecords] Box 283, Folders 09 & 18, ISACMAUC.12 Robert McCormick Adams to Leo Anderson, 27 May 1960, DCR Box 287, Folders 09, ISACMAUC.13 ‘Observations on Near Eastern Research Policy at the University of Chicago’, n.d., P[ersonal] P[apers] [and] S[pecial] C[ollections] [in the] S[mithsonian] I[nstitution] A[rchives] Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 8, Folder ‘Oriental Institute – Miscellaneous, c. 1955–1984’ https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_229252.14 Robert McCormick Adams to ‘Ezzatollah Negahbān, 24 June 1960, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’15 Robert McCormick Adams to ‘Ezzatollah Negahbān, 2 September 1960, DCR Box 289, Folder 15, ISACMAUC.16 W.B. Harrell to Robert McCormick Adams, 27 September 1960, DCR Box 287, Folder 09, ISACMAUC.17 ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters, Oct 15, 1950-Mar 11, 1973: Robert McCormick Adams, Iran,’ 388–390, 30 January 1961. https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.18 ‘Preliminary Report on Ancient Settlements and Agriculture in the Upper Khuzestan Plains’, 14 October 1962, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’19 Robert McCormick Adams to Graham DuShane, 30 March 1961, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’20 Robert McCormick Adams to David E. Lilienthal, 5 March 1979, PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 9, Folder ‘Iran, c. 1959–1979.’21 ‘‘Observations on Near Eastern research policy at the University of Chicago,’ PPSCSIA Accession 98–131 Adams, Robert McC. Box 8, ‘Oriental Institute – Miscellaneous, c. 1955–1984.’22 W.A. Copeland to Froelich Rainey, 29 November 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 3, P[ahlavi] U[niversity] P[rojects] R[ecords] 1958–1966, U[niversity] [of] P[ennsylvania] A[rchives] [and] R[ecords] C[enter].23 Ibid.24 Ibid.25 W.A. Copeland to Murray Nicol, 10 June 1965, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.26 Murray Nicol to Torab Basiri 15 July 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 3, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.27 Ibid.28 Murray Nicol to Asadollah Alam, 19 February 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4 Folder 4, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.29 ‘News Release: Pahlavi University’s Dorudzan Expedition’, 25 June 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.30 Ibid.31 Murray, Nicol ‘Progress Report’, 14 March 1966, UPB107 General Files Box 4, Folder 4, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.32 Murray Nicol to W.A. Copeland 10 May 1967, UPB107 General Files Box 4 Folder 2, PUPR 1958–1966, UPARC.33 Proudlove, J.A. 1969. ‘The Influence of town planning proposals on the cultural monuments in the historic cities of Tabriz, Qasvin, Ispahan and Shiraz: Iran – (mission) July 1969.’ https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000008815.34 Note also that Syria had rejected Point IV support and TVA consultants (Luke and Meskell Citation2019, 11, 13).35 Bedrettin Tuncel to René Maheu, 21 February 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.36 Mahdi Elmandjra to Bedrettin Tuncel, 9 July 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.37 Christophe, Louis. ‘Mission en Turquie 20–25 Octobre 1968’, 31 October 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.38 The Institute for the study of Ancient Cultures had by then long been active in eastern Anatolia, with expeditions led by Robert and Linda Braidwood, Hans Güterbock, and Maurits van Loon (see ‘The Oriental Institute Archaeological Newsletters,’ 2–8).39 Christophe, Louis. ‘Mission en Turquie 20–25 Octobre 1968,’ 31 October 1968, CLT 122 53 069 72 (560) AMS 240 1967–1968 (Keban), UNESCO Archives.40 Additional connections to Nubia included archaeologist James E. Knudstad and architect Horat Jarits. These chance encounters with Nubia veterans at Keban – both engineers and archaeologists – attest to the close ties within the regional networks of personnel forged along the Nile (Meskell and Luke Citation2021, 6; for an example of how engineers and archaeologists found themselves in conflict over the relative balance of conservation, research, and profit in such projects, see Meskell Citation2019, 12–15).
伊朗和土耳其发展十年期间的实地考古和外国援助
【摘要】20世纪60年代,在外国援助资助的以水坝为主导的地区发展项目的推动下,中东地区的野外考古范围发生了巨大变化。与大萧条时期在美国东南部首先发展起来的大坝项目密切相关的流域救助范例,与大坝建设专业知识一起被输出,但却产生了意想不到的结果。发展十年并没有建立一个世界性的紧急考古系统,以减轻全球现代化项目对遗产造成的威胁,而是使考古学家成为灌溉、教育和金融方面的顾问——这是当今考古学与发展之间联系的主导模式出现的关键先决条件,这种联系以遵守法规的实地调查和鼓励文化旅游为中心。关键词:考古发展;外援;技术援助披露声明作者未发现潜在的利益冲突。注1值得注意的是,虽然这些组织中的许多,尤其是美国国际开发署,将他们的工作描述为中立或慈善的努力,但总有一个隐含的经济利益——最近被称为“利润援助”(见Khastagir Citation2021)——只要他们旨在为美国公司打开新市场,无论是作为原材料和廉价劳动力的来源,还是作为美国制造的制成品的消费基地。在许多情况下,这种遗产一直延续到现在(例如,Attewell Citation2023;诺里斯Citation2021;Svitych Citation2023)。2《关于保护受到公共或私人工程危害的文化财产》,1968年11月19日,https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-preservation-cultural-property-endangered-public-or-private-works;参见Meskell关于此主题的论述(Citation2018, 46)在土耳其,打捞任务实际上于1993年确立,但直到2000年代才在法律上确立(Özdoğan和Eres Citation2016, 66-67);在伊朗,打捞任务于1988年确立(Sardari Citation2016;Citation2021) 4。胡齐斯坦地区的统一发展,1958年8月28日,[普林斯顿大学图书馆珍稀图书与特藏部,Seeley Mudd手稿库,公共政策论文]P[论文]D[avid E.] L[ilienthal], S[子系列]18C [1955-1958], box 409。https://findingaids.princeton.edu/catalog/MC148_c03234.5 '胡齐斯坦地区的统一发展,' 1 - 3.6唐纳德·威尔伯给大卫·e·李林塔尔,1958年12月1日,PDL S-18C,箱409.7 '东方研究所考古通讯,1950年10月15日- 1973年3月11日;罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯,伊朗,' 388-390,1961年1月30日。https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.8利奥·安德森致罗伯特·布莱德伍德,1959年7月30日,董事通信。记录。[第09号文件夹第287号盒],[为][研究][古代][文化][博物馆][档案馆][芝加哥大学]。罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯,1994年5月26日,史密森学会档案记录单元9602,口述历史访谈https://youtu.be/t4C1T4SO52s?t=1861.10同上。11罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯致利奥·安德森,1959年8月10日,D[董事]C[通信]R[记录]283箱,09和18文件夹,isacmauc。12罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯致利奥·安德森,1960年5月27日,DCR盒287,09文件夹,ISACMAUC.13“芝加哥大学近东研究政策观察”,无日期。P[个人的]P[文件][和]S[特别的]C[收藏][在]S[史密森尼]I[机构]A[档案]收录98-131第8栏,文件夹“东方研究所-杂,c. 1955-1984”https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_229252.14 Robert McCormick Adams to Ezzatollah Negahbān, 1960年6月24日,PPSCSIA加入98-131。框9,文件夹“伊朗,1959-1979年”。“15罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯致伊扎图拉Negahbān, 1960年9月2日,DCR盒289,文件夹15,isacmau .16 W.B.哈雷尔致罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯,1960年9月27日,DCR盒287,文件夹09,isacmau .17”东方研究所考古通讯,1950年10月15日- 1973年3月11日;罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯,伊朗,388-390,1961年1月30日。https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/archeological-newsletters.18“关于上胡齐斯坦平原古代定居点和农业的初步报告”,1962年10月14日,PPSCSIA加入98-131。框9,文件夹“伊朗,1959-1979年”。19罗伯特·麦考密克·亚当斯致格雷厄姆·杜尚恩,1961年3月30日,PPSCSIA加入98-131框9,文件夹“伊朗,1959-1979年”。[20] Robert McCormick Adams对David E. Lilienthal, 1979年3月5日,PPSCSIA加入98-131。框9,文件夹“伊朗,1959-1979年”。[21]“芝加哥大学近东研究政策的观察”,PPSCSIA第98-131期。专栏8,东方研究所-杂项,约1955-1984年。“22西澳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: History and Anthropology continues to address the intersection of history and social sciences, focusing on the interchange between anthropologically-informed history, historically-informed anthropology and the history of ethnographic and anthropological representation. It is now widely perceived that the formerly dominant ahistorical perspectives within anthropology severely restricted interpretation and analysis. Much recent work has therefore been concerned with social change and colonial history and the traditional problems such as symbolism, have been rethought in historical terms. History and Anthropology publishes articles which develop these concerns, and is particularly interested in linking new substantive analyses with critical perspectives on anthropological discourse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信