Preference sorting versus Check-All-That-Apply on sensory drivers of liking determination: A complementary study assessing dulce de leche

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jéssica Ferreira Rodrigues, Katiúcia Alves Amorim, Vanessa Rios de Souza, Ana Carolina Ratti Nogueira, Ana Carla Marques Pinheiro
{"title":"Preference sorting versus Check-All-That-Apply on sensory drivers of liking determination: A complementary study assessing dulce de leche","authors":"Jéssica Ferreira Rodrigues,&nbsp;Katiúcia Alves Amorim,&nbsp;Vanessa Rios de Souza,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Ratti Nogueira,&nbsp;Ana Carla Marques Pinheiro","doi":"10.1111/joss.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Product sensory description is a fundamental action in sensory science, traditionally achieved through descriptive sensory tests. Rapid methods (Sorting and check all that apply [CATA]) that do not require trained sensory panels have been increasingly implemented to save time and costs. Considering the traditionality of the CATA method, this study is an extension of previous research on sensory drivers of liking of dulce de leche, comprising an investigation of Preference Sorting (PS) versus CATA to compare the results and information obtained from both techniques. PS and CATA tests showed similar results in determining dulce de leche sensory drivers of liking. However, some differences on sensory description were noted. Consumers considered the PS test more difficult than CATA. PS proved to be an alternative in determining the product sensory drivers of liking for a screening of a large number of samples, providing similar results to the traditional test—the CATA test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this study show practical utility for consumer-based methodologies, focusing on sorting tasks and sensory drivers of liking determination, complementing the preference sorting studies in a comparative perspective with a traditional sensory method to understand the technique and its applicability better. In addition, they are useful for Brazilian dulce de leche producers as they enable an understanding of consumer preferences to plan production, marketing, and commercialization strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Product sensory description is a fundamental action in sensory science, traditionally achieved through descriptive sensory tests. Rapid methods (Sorting and check all that apply [CATA]) that do not require trained sensory panels have been increasingly implemented to save time and costs. Considering the traditionality of the CATA method, this study is an extension of previous research on sensory drivers of liking of dulce de leche, comprising an investigation of Preference Sorting (PS) versus CATA to compare the results and information obtained from both techniques. PS and CATA tests showed similar results in determining dulce de leche sensory drivers of liking. However, some differences on sensory description were noted. Consumers considered the PS test more difficult than CATA. PS proved to be an alternative in determining the product sensory drivers of liking for a screening of a large number of samples, providing similar results to the traditional test—the CATA test.

Practical Applications

The findings of this study show practical utility for consumer-based methodologies, focusing on sorting tasks and sensory drivers of liking determination, complementing the preference sorting studies in a comparative perspective with a traditional sensory method to understand the technique and its applicability better. In addition, they are useful for Brazilian dulce de leche producers as they enable an understanding of consumer preferences to plan production, marketing, and commercialization strategies.

偏好排序与 "全部检查"(Check-All-That-Apply)对确定喜好的感官驱动因素的影响:一项评估果仁糖的补充研究
产品感官描述是感官科学的一项基本工作,传统上通过描述性感官测试来实现。为了节省时间和成本,越来越多地采用不需要训练有素的感官小组的快速方法(分类和检查所有适用的方法 [CATA])。考虑到 CATA 方法的传统性,本研究是对以往关于喜欢果仁糖的感官驱动因素研究的延伸,包括偏好排序(PS)与 CATA 的调查,以比较从两种技术中获得的结果和信息。偏好排序法和 CATA 测试在确定果仁糖的感官喜好驱动因素方面显示出相似的结果。不过,在感官描述方面还是存在一些差异。消费者认为 PS 测试比 CATA 更难。事实证明,在对大量样品进行筛选时,PS 是确定产品感官喜好驱动因素的另一种方法,其结果与传统的 CATA 测试相似。 实际应用 本研究的结果表明,以消费者为基础的方法具有实际效用,其重点是排序任务和确定喜好的感官驱动因素,从与传统感官方法比较的角度对偏好排序研究进行了补充,以便更好地了解该技术及其适用性。此外,这些研究结果对巴西的果酱生产商也很有用,因为它们有助于了解消费者的喜好,从而规划生产、营销和商业化战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信