Influences of cloud vertical overlapping on the calculated cloud albedo and their validation with satellite observations

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Hua Zhang, Haibo Wang, Yangang Liu, Xianwen Jing, Yi Liu
{"title":"Influences of cloud vertical overlapping on the calculated cloud albedo and their validation with satellite observations","authors":"Hua Zhang, Haibo Wang, Yangang Liu, Xianwen Jing, Yi Liu","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-22-0219.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cloud albedo is expected to influence cloud radiative forcing in addition to cloud fraction, and inadequate description of the cloud overlapping effects on the cloud fraction may influence the simulated cloud fraction, and thus the relative cloud radiative forcing (RCRF) and cloud albedo. In this study, we first present a new formula by extending that presented previously in Liu et al. (2011) to consider multilayer clouds directly in the relationship between cloud albedo, cloud fraction and RCRF, and then quantitatively evaluate the effects of different cloud vertical overlapping structures, represented by the decorrelation length scales ( L cf ), on the simulated cloud albedos. We use the BCC_AGCM2.0_CUACE/Aero model with simultaneous validation by observations from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiation Energy System (CERES) satellite. When L cf < 4 km (i.e., the cloud overlap is closer to the random overlap), the simulated cloud albedos are generally in good agreement with the satellite-based albedos for December–February and June–August; when L cf ≥ 4 km (i.e., the cloud vertical overlap is closer to the maximum overlap), the difference between simulated and observed cloud albedos became larger, due mainly to significant differences in cloud fractions and RCRF. Further quantitative analysis shows that the relative Euclidean distance, which represents the degree of overall model–observation disagreement, increases with the L cf for all three variables (cloud albedo, cloud fraction and RCRF), indicating the importance of cloud vertical overlapping in determining the accuracy of the calculated cloud albedo for multilayer clouds.","PeriodicalId":17231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"116 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-22-0219.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Cloud albedo is expected to influence cloud radiative forcing in addition to cloud fraction, and inadequate description of the cloud overlapping effects on the cloud fraction may influence the simulated cloud fraction, and thus the relative cloud radiative forcing (RCRF) and cloud albedo. In this study, we first present a new formula by extending that presented previously in Liu et al. (2011) to consider multilayer clouds directly in the relationship between cloud albedo, cloud fraction and RCRF, and then quantitatively evaluate the effects of different cloud vertical overlapping structures, represented by the decorrelation length scales ( L cf ), on the simulated cloud albedos. We use the BCC_AGCM2.0_CUACE/Aero model with simultaneous validation by observations from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiation Energy System (CERES) satellite. When L cf < 4 km (i.e., the cloud overlap is closer to the random overlap), the simulated cloud albedos are generally in good agreement with the satellite-based albedos for December–February and June–August; when L cf ≥ 4 km (i.e., the cloud vertical overlap is closer to the maximum overlap), the difference between simulated and observed cloud albedos became larger, due mainly to significant differences in cloud fractions and RCRF. Further quantitative analysis shows that the relative Euclidean distance, which represents the degree of overall model–observation disagreement, increases with the L cf for all three variables (cloud albedo, cloud fraction and RCRF), indicating the importance of cloud vertical overlapping in determining the accuracy of the calculated cloud albedo for multilayer clouds.
云垂直重叠对计算云反照率的影响及其与卫星观测的验证
云反照率除了影响云分数外,还会影响云的辐射强迫,云重叠对云分数的影响描述不充分可能会影响模拟的云分数,从而影响相对云辐射强迫(RCRF)和云反照率。在本研究中,我们首先扩展Liu et al.(2011)提出的新公式,直接考虑多层云在云反照率、云分数和RCRF之间的关系,然后定量评价以去相关长度尺度(L cf)为代表的不同云垂直重叠结构对模拟云反照率的影响。我们使用BCC_AGCM2.0_CUACE/Aero模型,并同时通过云层和地球辐射能量系统(CERES)卫星的观测进行验证。当L cf <4 km(即云重叠更接近随机重叠)时,12 - 2月和6 - 8月的模拟云反照率与星载反照率基本吻合;当L cf≥4 km时(即云垂直重叠更接近最大重叠),模拟云反照率与观测云反照率的差异变大,这主要是由于云组分和RCRF的显著差异所致。进一步的定量分析表明,对于所有三个变量(云反照率、云分数和RCRF),代表总体模式与观测不一致程度的相对欧几里得距离随着L cf的增加而增加,这表明云垂直重叠在决定多层云的云反照率计算精度方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) publishes basic research related to the physics, dynamics, and chemistry of the atmosphere of Earth and other planets, with emphasis on the quantitative and deductive aspects of the subject. The links provide detailed information for readers, authors, reviewers, and those who wish to submit a manuscript for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信