Branding being true: visibility politics and Nike’s engagement with LGBTQ+ communities

IF 1.1 1区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Evan Brody
{"title":"Branding being true: visibility politics and Nike’s engagement with LGBTQ+ communities","authors":"Evan Brody","doi":"10.1080/14791420.2023.2272834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn this article, the author examines Nike’s engagement with LGBTQ + communities through its Be True products and campaigns. An analysis of Nike’s official statements about the line, and its advertising campaigns, illuminates how Nike encourages an incitement to visibility for LGBTQ + individuals without attending to the material consequences of doing so. The author also unpacks how Nike yokes the embodiment of idealized identity traits to its products, a process identified as commodity actualization. The goal is to highlight the role that market activities play in supplanting traditional activism and to make the unstable relationship between visibility, truth, and equality legible.KEYWORDS: LGBTQ+visibilitysports medianeoliberalismcommodity activism AcknowledgementsThe author thanks Dr. Hollis Griffin and Dr. Nicky Lewis for their thoughtful feedback and advice on this article, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their generous recommendations. The author would also like to thank Dr. Robin M. Boylorn and Dr. Cassidy D. Ellis for their editorial guidance and helpful feedback during the publication process.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 LGBTQ+ is used to refer to all individuals who are marginalized because of their sexual and/or gender identities. When other terms are used, they are done so to honor their usage by individuals who are quoted or have specific job titles that utilize a different acronym. 2012 is highlighted here as it was the year Be True began and the start of hypermediated “coming outs” of active professional athletes, such as: Megan Rapinoe (2012), Brittney Griner (2013), Jason Collins (2013), and Michael Sam (2014).2 GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2023,” 2023, https://assets.glaad.org/m/23036571f611c54/original/Accelerating-Acceptance-2023.pdf; GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2018,” 2018, https://www.glaad.org/files/aa/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202018.pdf; Nadia Suleman, “Young Americans Are Increasingly ‘Uncomfortable’ With LGBTQ Community, GLAAD Study Shows,” Time, June 25, 2019, https://time.com/5613276/glaad-acceptance-index-lgbtq-survey/; GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2020,” 2020, https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202020.pdf; The Human Rights Project, “LGBTQ+ Americans under attack: A report and reflection on the 2023 state legislative session,” 2023, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Anti-LGBTQ-Legislation-Impact-Report.pdf; Movement Advancement Project, “Bans on Transgender Youth Participation in Sports,” 2023, https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/sports_participation_bans.3 Throughout this article I deliberately use communities, rather than community, to signal the diversity of bodies and experiences navigated by LGBTQ+ individuals. Since its inception, Nike has styled the name of the product line in various ways, such as BETRUE, #BeTrue, BeTrue, and Be True. At the time of publication, Nike is using Be True in their written press releases. I use this formatting throughout, unless a quote dictates otherwise.4 Herman Gray, “Subject(ed) to Recognition,” American Quarterly 65, no. 4 (2013): 773; Kim Toffoletti and Holly Thorpe, “Female Athletes’ Self-Representation on Social Media: A Feminist Analysis of Neoliberal Marketing Strategies in “Economies of Visibility,” Feminism and Psychology 28, no. 1 (2018): 11–31.5 For example, Roopali Mukherjee and Sarah Banet-Weiser, introduction to Commodity Activism: Cultural Resistance in Neoliberal Times (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 1–17; Francesca Sobande, “Woke-washing: ‘Intersectional’ Femvertising and Branding ‘Woke’ Bravery,” European Journal of Marketing, 54, no. 11 (2019): 2723–45; Lisa A. Daily, “‘We Bleed for Female Empowerment’: Mediated Ethics, Commodity Feminism, and the Contradictions of Feminist Politics,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (2019): 143;6 The company reported a net income of $5.7 billion in 2021.7 Celia Lury, Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy (London: Routledge, 2004).8 Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005), 3.9 Geoffrey B. Sprinkle and Laureen A. Maines, “The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business Horizons, 53 (2010): 445–53; Minette E. Drumwright, “Advertising With A Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria,” Journal of Marketing, 60, no. 4 (1996): 71–87; Menno D. T. de Jong and Mark van der Meer, “How Does it Fit? Exploring the Congruence Between Organizations and Their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities,” Journal of Business Ethics, 143 (2017): 71–83.10 Ronald Alsop, “Perils of Corporate Philanthropy: Touting Good Works Offends the Public, But Reticence is Perceived as Inaction.” The Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2002; Alina Dizik, “Education for Executives: Teaching the Golden Rules.” The Wall Street Journal, November 19, 2009.11 Sobande, “Woke-washing,” 2019.12 Rong Wang and Amy O’Connor, “Can Corporate-Nonprofit Partnerships Buffer Socially Irresponsible Corporations From Stakeholder Backlash?,” Corporate Communication: An International Journal, (2022).13 The 2021 campaign was the last one produced prior to the submission of this article.14 Simona Petracovschi and Jessica W. Chin, “Sports, Physical Practice, and the Female Body, 1980–1989: Women’s Emancipation in Romania Under Communism,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 36, no. 1 (2019): 35–57.15 Norman Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (London: Longman, 1995), 132.16 Jennifer McClearen, “‘We are all Fighters’: The Transmedia Marketing of Difference in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC),” International Journal of Communication 11, (2017): 3224–41; Jennifer McClearen, Fighting Visibility: Sports Media and Female Athletes in the UFC (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2021), 13.17 Nike News, “Inside Access: The Nike Dunk Celebrates 30 Years as an Icon,” April 17, 2015, https://news.nike.com/news/inside-access-the-iconic-nike-dunk-turns-30.18 C.L. Cole and Amy Hribar, “Celebrity Feminism: Nike Style Post-Fordism, Transcendence, and Consumer Power,” Sociology of Sport Journal 12 (1995): 347–69; Myra Macdonald, Representing Women: Myths of Femininity in Popular Media. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 1995); C.L. Cole, “American Jordan: P.L.A.Y., Consensus, and Punishment,” Sociology of Sport Journal 13 (1996): 366–97; Michelle T. Helstein, “That’s Who I Want to be: The Politics and Production of Desire Within Nike Advertising to Women,” Journal of Sport & Social Issues 27, no. 3 (2003): 276–92; and Jennifer McClearen, “‘If You Let Me Play’: Girls’ Empowerment and Transgender Exclusion in Sports,” Feminist Media Studies 23 (2023): 1361–67.19 McClearen, Fighting Visibility, 19.20 Lisa Duggan, The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 2003); and Rohini S. Singh, “In the Company of Citizens: The Rhetorical Contours of Singapore’s Neoliberalism,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16, no. 3 (2019): 161–77.21 Nike News, “The 2015 Nike BETRUE Collection Celebrates the Potential of All Athletes,” June 3, 2015, https://news.nike.com/news/the-2015-nike-betrue-collection-celebrates-the-potential-of-all-athletes.22 Shari L. Dworkin and Michael A. Messner, “Just Do … what? Sport, Bodies, Gender,” in Gender and Sport: A Reader, ed. Shelia Scraton and Anne Flintoff (London: Routledge, 2002), 21.23 Nike News, “BETRUE 2017,” May 26, 2017. https://news.nike.com/news/betrue-2017.24 Bonnie Dow, “Ellen, Television, and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 18, no. 2 (2001): 123–40.25 Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Epistemology of the Closet (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990); and C. Riley Snorton, Nobody is Supposed to Know: Black Sexuality on the Down Low (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014).26 Kevin G. Barnhurst, “Visibility as Paradox: Representation and Simultaneous Contrast,” in Media/Queered: Visibility and Its Discontents, ed. Kevin G. Barnhurst (New York: Peter Lang, 2007), 1–20.27 Alfred Martin Jr. and Kathleen Battles, “The Straight Labor of Playing Gay,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 38, no. 2 (2021): 130.28 Evan Brody, “With the 249th Pick … Michael Sam and Imagining Failure Otherwise,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 43, no. 4 (2019): 296–318.29 D. Travers Scott, “‘Coming Out of the Closet’ – Examining a Metaphor,” Annals of the International Communication Association 42, no. 3 (2018): 145–54.30 Sarah Banet-Weiser, “‘Confidence you can Carry!’: Girls in Crisis and the Market for Girls’ Empowerment Organizations,” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies (2015): 183.31 Sarah Banet-Weiser, “‘Free Self-Esteem Tools?’: Brand Culture, Gender, and the Dove Real Beauty Campaign” in Commodity Activism: Cultural Resistance in Neoliberal Times, ed. Roopali Mukherjee and Sarah Banet-Weiser (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 40.32 F. Hollis Griffin, Feeling Normal: Sexuality and Media Criticism in the Digital Age (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017).33 Courtney Szto, “Saving Lives With Soccer and Shoelaces: The Hyperreality of Nike (RED),” Sociology of Sport Journal 30 (2013): 41–56.34 Mukherjee and Banet-Weiser, Introduction; Akane Kanai and Rosalind Gill, “Woke? Affect, neoliberalism, marginalised identities and consumer culture” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 102, (2020): 10–27.35 Nina Åkestam, Sara Rosengren, and Micael Dahlen, “Advertising “Like a Girl”: Toward a Better Understanding of ‘Femvertising’ and its Effects,” Psychology and Marketing, 34, no. 8 (2017): 795–806.36 Banet-Weiser, “‘Confidence you can Carry!”, 185.37 Sarah Banet-Weiser, Authentic™: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2012); Daily, “We Bleed”, 143.38 Joel Penney, The Citizen Marketer: Promoting Political Opinion in the Social Media Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).39 Commodity actualization produces resources that bolster both politics and economies of visibility.40 This also demonstrates how commodity actualization is part of the process through which economies of visibility are created and sustained since the focus is on the way in which individuals, through their purchasing choices, can rearticulate themselves as “authentic” subjects.41 Jeffrey Montez de Oca, Sherry Mason, and Sung Ahn, “Consuming for the Greater Good: ‘Woke’ Commercials in Sports Media,” Communication & Sport (2020): 1–23.42 Team INDIE, “Meet the LGBTQ+ Berliners Finding Strength in Sport,” INDIE Magazine, July 16, 2019, https://indie-mag.com/2019/07/nike-be-true/.43 The language of ownership is reflected in athlete coming out statements. For example, when asked to justify why he came out when he did, Michael Sam said “I wanted to own my truth.”44 C.L. Cole, “American Jordan: P.L.A.Y., Consensus, and Punishment,” Sociology of Sport Journal 13 (1996): 366–97; Lyndsay M. C. Hayhurst, and Courtney Szto, “Corporatizating Activism Through Sport-Focused Social Justice? Investigating Nike’s Corporate Responsibility Initiatives in Sport for Development and Peace,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 40, no. 6 (2016): 522–44; Montez de Oca, Mason, and Ahn, “Consuming for the Greater Good”, 7.; and Szto, “Saving Lives,” 2013.45 Ana Swanson, “Nike and Coca-Cola Lobby Against Xinjiang Forced Labor Bill.” New York Times, January 20, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/29/business/economy/nike-coca-cola-xinjiang-forced-labor-bill.html.46 While Nike has made strides to provide better working conditions in its overseas factories after reports in the 1990s identified unsafe and abusive working conditions, there are still problematic wage discrepancies in its business model as evidenced by Nike’s $6 billion annual expenditures on athlete endorsements and sponsorships compared to the €82–200 per month they pay the workers who make these items, of whom over 80% are women in Indonesia.47 Samantha King, “An All-Consuming Cause: Breast Cancer, Corporate Philanthropy, and the Market for Generosity,” Social Text, 19, No. 4 (2001): 115–43.48 Archie B. Carroll and Kareem M. Shabana, “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, no. 1 (2010): 85–105.49 Nike, “Pride Community Grants,” 2021, https://purpose.nike.com/pride-community-grants.50 In 2018 alone, 78% of political contributions from Nike’s PAC went to Republicans just a year after the Republican-controlled House, Senate, and White House rolled back protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, which had a disproportionately negative affect on transgender individuals. Nihal Krishan, “Despite Recent ‘Progressive’ Ads with Colin Kaepernick, Nike Gives More Money to Republicans Than Democrats,” Open Secrets, September 12, 2018, https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/09/colin-kaepernick-nike-gives/; OpenSecrets “Nike Inc.,” 2021, https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/nike-inc/recipients?candscycle=2020&id=D000027998&toprecipscycle=2018.51 iSpot.TV., “Nike TV Commercial, ‘Unlimited Courage’ Featuring Chris Mosier,” https://www.ispot.tv/ad/ARNT/nike-unlimited-courage-featuring-chris-mosier.52 Nike, “Unlimited Courage” [Television commercial], Vimeo (2016), https://vimeo.com/177952174.53 Brody, Evan, D. Travers Scott, and Katrina L. Pariera. “LGBTQ+ Collegiate Athletes and the Double Bind: Insights From the Experiences of Out Varsity Athletes.” International Journal of Communication 16 (2022): 21.54 John D’Emilio, Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 1.55 Gray, “Subject(ed),” 772.56 Gray, “Subject(ed),” 2013.57 Julia Himberg, The New Gay for Pay: The Sexual Politics of American Television Production (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2017), 4; Mia Fischer et al., “A Conversation: Queer Digital Media Resources and Research,” First Monday 23, no. 7 (2018), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i7.9255. Emphasis in original.58 Fischer, Terrorizing Gender, 4.59 Mia Fischer, “Piss(ed): The Biopolitics of the Bathroom,” Communication, Culture & Critique, 12, no. 3 (2019): 397–415; Owen, D.W. Hargie, David H. Mitchell, and Ian J.A. Somerville, “‘People Have a Knack of Making You Feel Excluded if They Catch on to Your Difference’: Transgender Experiences of Exclusion in Sport,” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 52, no. 2 (2019): 223–39; Shannon S.C. Herrick and Lindsay R. Duncan, “A Qualitative Exploration of LGBTQ+ and Intersecting Identities Within Physical Activity Contexts,” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 40 (2018): 325–35; and Ellen D.B. Riggle, “Experiences of a Gender Non-Conforming Lesbian in the ‘Ladies’ (Rest) Room,” Journal of Lesbian Studies 22, no. 4, (2018): 482–95, among others.60 Human Rights Campaign, “Understanding the Transgender Community” (n.d.), https://www.hrc.org/resources/understanding-the-transgender-community.61 This also minimizes the “double burden” that accompanies individuals such as Mosier who must not only fight discrimination as the first in their respective industry but are then expected to be a national spokesperson tasked with representing an entire community. Thomas, Gazing, 2020.62 Katherine L. Lavelle, “‘Plays Like a Guy’: A Rhetorical Analysis of Brittney Griner in Sports Media,” Journal of Sports Media 9, no. 2, (2014): 115–31.63 John M. Sloop, “‘This is Not Natural’: Caster Semenya’s Gender Threats,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 29, no. 2 (2012): 81–96.64 Mia Fischer and Jennifer McClearen, “Transgender Athletes and the Queer Art of Athletic Failure,” Communication and Sport 8, no. 2 (2020): 154.65 Moya Bailey, “Misogynoir in Medical Media: On Caster Semenya and R. Kelly,” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 2, no. 2 (2016): 1–31; and Sarah J. Blithe and Jenna N. Hanchey, “The Discursive Emergence of Gendered Physiological Discrimination in Sex Verification Testing,” Women’s Studies in Communication 38, no. 4 (2015): 486–506.66 Nike, “Nobody Wins Alone” [Television commercial], YouTube, (2019), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck76-4lAgV4.67 The ruling only applied to “middle distance” events so Semenya, and others, were considered female-enough to run shorter or longer distances, such as the 100-, 200-, and 3000-meter races, but not the specific races for which they had trained and competed in previously.68 One of Semenya’s former competitors, Madeleine Pape, has reflected on her path as one of those “quick to join the chorus of voices around me that were beginning to accuse Semenya of having an unfair advantage” to now seeing Semenya as “a good thing for women’s sport.” She further discusses how Semenya’s sexual identity and non-traditional gender expression played into long-standing biases about femininity and heterosexuality in Track & Field and states that “it is very fair to be asking why women of color from the global south and from sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, are overrepresented amongst the women who’ve been accused of having an unfair advantage.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro, “Olympic Runner who Once Competed Against Caster Semenya Weights in on Testosterone Ruling,” May 5, 2019, National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2019/05/05/720376207/olympic-runner-who-once-competed-against-caster-semenya-weighs-in-on-testosteron.69 National Public Radio, “Wave of Bills to Block Trans Athletes Has no Basis in Science, Researcher Says,” NPR, March 18, 2021, https://www.npr.org/2021/03/18/978716732/wave-of-new-bills-say-trans-athletes-have-an-unfair-edge-what-does-the-science-s.70 Wyatt Ronan, “2021 Officially Becomes Worst Year in Recent History for LGBTQ State Legislative Attacks as Unprecedented Number of States Enact Record-Shattering Number of Anti-LGBTQ Measures Into Law,” Human Rights Campaign, May 7, 2021, https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/2021-officially-becomes-worst-year-in-recent-history-for-lgbtq-state-legislative-attacks-as-unprecedented-number-of-states-enact-record-shattering-number-of-anti-lgbtq-measures-into-law; Cullen Peele, “Roundup of Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation Advancing in States Across the Country,” Human Rights Campaign, May 23, 2023, https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/roundup-of-anti-lgbtq-legislation-advancing-in-states-across-the-country; Movement Advancement Project, “Bans on Transgender Youth.”71 Gray, Subject(ed), 774. Emphasis in original.72 Human Rights Watch, “‘They’re Chasing us Away From Sport’: Human Rights Violations in Sex Testing of Elite Women Athletes,” December 4, 2020, https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/12/04/theyre-chasing-us-away-sport/human-rights-violations-sex-testing-elite-women.73 Nike, “This is Our Time” [Television commercial], YouTube, (2020), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2rC_iOLfcY.74 Nike, “Radical Inclusivity” [Television commercial], (2021).75 Nike News, “The 2021 Be True Collection Brings the Energy, One Story (And Patch) at a Time,” June 4, 2021, https://news.nike.com/news/nike-be-true-collection-2021-official-images-release-date.76 Ibid.77 Ibid.78 Courtney M. Cox, “Haram Hoops? FIBA, Nike, and the Hijab’s Half-Court Defense” in Communication and Sport, ed. Michael Butterworth (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021): 199–215.79 Ronan, 2021 Officially Becomes, 2021.80 Mary L. Gray, Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America (New York: New York University Press, 2009).","PeriodicalId":46339,"journal":{"name":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","volume":"15 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and Critical-Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2023.2272834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn this article, the author examines Nike’s engagement with LGBTQ + communities through its Be True products and campaigns. An analysis of Nike’s official statements about the line, and its advertising campaigns, illuminates how Nike encourages an incitement to visibility for LGBTQ + individuals without attending to the material consequences of doing so. The author also unpacks how Nike yokes the embodiment of idealized identity traits to its products, a process identified as commodity actualization. The goal is to highlight the role that market activities play in supplanting traditional activism and to make the unstable relationship between visibility, truth, and equality legible.KEYWORDS: LGBTQ+visibilitysports medianeoliberalismcommodity activism AcknowledgementsThe author thanks Dr. Hollis Griffin and Dr. Nicky Lewis for their thoughtful feedback and advice on this article, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their generous recommendations. The author would also like to thank Dr. Robin M. Boylorn and Dr. Cassidy D. Ellis for their editorial guidance and helpful feedback during the publication process.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 LGBTQ+ is used to refer to all individuals who are marginalized because of their sexual and/or gender identities. When other terms are used, they are done so to honor their usage by individuals who are quoted or have specific job titles that utilize a different acronym. 2012 is highlighted here as it was the year Be True began and the start of hypermediated “coming outs” of active professional athletes, such as: Megan Rapinoe (2012), Brittney Griner (2013), Jason Collins (2013), and Michael Sam (2014).2 GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2023,” 2023, https://assets.glaad.org/m/23036571f611c54/original/Accelerating-Acceptance-2023.pdf; GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2018,” 2018, https://www.glaad.org/files/aa/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202018.pdf; Nadia Suleman, “Young Americans Are Increasingly ‘Uncomfortable’ With LGBTQ Community, GLAAD Study Shows,” Time, June 25, 2019, https://time.com/5613276/glaad-acceptance-index-lgbtq-survey/; GLAAD, “Accelerating Acceptance 2020,” 2020, https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202020.pdf; The Human Rights Project, “LGBTQ+ Americans under attack: A report and reflection on the 2023 state legislative session,” 2023, https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Anti-LGBTQ-Legislation-Impact-Report.pdf; Movement Advancement Project, “Bans on Transgender Youth Participation in Sports,” 2023, https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/sports_participation_bans.3 Throughout this article I deliberately use communities, rather than community, to signal the diversity of bodies and experiences navigated by LGBTQ+ individuals. Since its inception, Nike has styled the name of the product line in various ways, such as BETRUE, #BeTrue, BeTrue, and Be True. At the time of publication, Nike is using Be True in their written press releases. I use this formatting throughout, unless a quote dictates otherwise.4 Herman Gray, “Subject(ed) to Recognition,” American Quarterly 65, no. 4 (2013): 773; Kim Toffoletti and Holly Thorpe, “Female Athletes’ Self-Representation on Social Media: A Feminist Analysis of Neoliberal Marketing Strategies in “Economies of Visibility,” Feminism and Psychology 28, no. 1 (2018): 11–31.5 For example, Roopali Mukherjee and Sarah Banet-Weiser, introduction to Commodity Activism: Cultural Resistance in Neoliberal Times (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 1–17; Francesca Sobande, “Woke-washing: ‘Intersectional’ Femvertising and Branding ‘Woke’ Bravery,” European Journal of Marketing, 54, no. 11 (2019): 2723–45; Lisa A. Daily, “‘We Bleed for Female Empowerment’: Mediated Ethics, Commodity Feminism, and the Contradictions of Feminist Politics,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16, no. 2 (2019): 143;6 The company reported a net income of $5.7 billion in 2021.7 Celia Lury, Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy (London: Routledge, 2004).8 Philip Kotler and Nancy Lee, Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005), 3.9 Geoffrey B. Sprinkle and Laureen A. Maines, “The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business Horizons, 53 (2010): 445–53; Minette E. Drumwright, “Advertising With A Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria,” Journal of Marketing, 60, no. 4 (1996): 71–87; Menno D. T. de Jong and Mark van der Meer, “How Does it Fit? Exploring the Congruence Between Organizations and Their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities,” Journal of Business Ethics, 143 (2017): 71–83.10 Ronald Alsop, “Perils of Corporate Philanthropy: Touting Good Works Offends the Public, But Reticence is Perceived as Inaction.” The Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2002; Alina Dizik, “Education for Executives: Teaching the Golden Rules.” The Wall Street Journal, November 19, 2009.11 Sobande, “Woke-washing,” 2019.12 Rong Wang and Amy O’Connor, “Can Corporate-Nonprofit Partnerships Buffer Socially Irresponsible Corporations From Stakeholder Backlash?,” Corporate Communication: An International Journal, (2022).13 The 2021 campaign was the last one produced prior to the submission of this article.14 Simona Petracovschi and Jessica W. Chin, “Sports, Physical Practice, and the Female Body, 1980–1989: Women’s Emancipation in Romania Under Communism,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 36, no. 1 (2019): 35–57.15 Norman Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (London: Longman, 1995), 132.16 Jennifer McClearen, “‘We are all Fighters’: The Transmedia Marketing of Difference in the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC),” International Journal of Communication 11, (2017): 3224–41; Jennifer McClearen, Fighting Visibility: Sports Media and Female Athletes in the UFC (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2021), 13.17 Nike News, “Inside Access: The Nike Dunk Celebrates 30 Years as an Icon,” April 17, 2015, https://news.nike.com/news/inside-access-the-iconic-nike-dunk-turns-30.18 C.L. Cole and Amy Hribar, “Celebrity Feminism: Nike Style Post-Fordism, Transcendence, and Consumer Power,” Sociology of Sport Journal 12 (1995): 347–69; Myra Macdonald, Representing Women: Myths of Femininity in Popular Media. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 1995); C.L. Cole, “American Jordan: P.L.A.Y., Consensus, and Punishment,” Sociology of Sport Journal 13 (1996): 366–97; Michelle T. Helstein, “That’s Who I Want to be: The Politics and Production of Desire Within Nike Advertising to Women,” Journal of Sport & Social Issues 27, no. 3 (2003): 276–92; and Jennifer McClearen, “‘If You Let Me Play’: Girls’ Empowerment and Transgender Exclusion in Sports,” Feminist Media Studies 23 (2023): 1361–67.19 McClearen, Fighting Visibility, 19.20 Lisa Duggan, The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 2003); and Rohini S. Singh, “In the Company of Citizens: The Rhetorical Contours of Singapore’s Neoliberalism,” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 16, no. 3 (2019): 161–77.21 Nike News, “The 2015 Nike BETRUE Collection Celebrates the Potential of All Athletes,” June 3, 2015, https://news.nike.com/news/the-2015-nike-betrue-collection-celebrates-the-potential-of-all-athletes.22 Shari L. Dworkin and Michael A. Messner, “Just Do … what? Sport, Bodies, Gender,” in Gender and Sport: A Reader, ed. Shelia Scraton and Anne Flintoff (London: Routledge, 2002), 21.23 Nike News, “BETRUE 2017,” May 26, 2017. https://news.nike.com/news/betrue-2017.24 Bonnie Dow, “Ellen, Television, and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 18, no. 2 (2001): 123–40.25 Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Epistemology of the Closet (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990); and C. Riley Snorton, Nobody is Supposed to Know: Black Sexuality on the Down Low (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014).26 Kevin G. Barnhurst, “Visibility as Paradox: Representation and Simultaneous Contrast,” in Media/Queered: Visibility and Its Discontents, ed. Kevin G. Barnhurst (New York: Peter Lang, 2007), 1–20.27 Alfred Martin Jr. and Kathleen Battles, “The Straight Labor of Playing Gay,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 38, no. 2 (2021): 130.28 Evan Brody, “With the 249th Pick … Michael Sam and Imagining Failure Otherwise,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 43, no. 4 (2019): 296–318.29 D. Travers Scott, “‘Coming Out of the Closet’ – Examining a Metaphor,” Annals of the International Communication Association 42, no. 3 (2018): 145–54.30 Sarah Banet-Weiser, “‘Confidence you can Carry!’: Girls in Crisis and the Market for Girls’ Empowerment Organizations,” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies (2015): 183.31 Sarah Banet-Weiser, “‘Free Self-Esteem Tools?’: Brand Culture, Gender, and the Dove Real Beauty Campaign” in Commodity Activism: Cultural Resistance in Neoliberal Times, ed. Roopali Mukherjee and Sarah Banet-Weiser (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 40.32 F. Hollis Griffin, Feeling Normal: Sexuality and Media Criticism in the Digital Age (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017).33 Courtney Szto, “Saving Lives With Soccer and Shoelaces: The Hyperreality of Nike (RED),” Sociology of Sport Journal 30 (2013): 41–56.34 Mukherjee and Banet-Weiser, Introduction; Akane Kanai and Rosalind Gill, “Woke? Affect, neoliberalism, marginalised identities and consumer culture” New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 102, (2020): 10–27.35 Nina Åkestam, Sara Rosengren, and Micael Dahlen, “Advertising “Like a Girl”: Toward a Better Understanding of ‘Femvertising’ and its Effects,” Psychology and Marketing, 34, no. 8 (2017): 795–806.36 Banet-Weiser, “‘Confidence you can Carry!”, 185.37 Sarah Banet-Weiser, Authentic™: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2012); Daily, “We Bleed”, 143.38 Joel Penney, The Citizen Marketer: Promoting Political Opinion in the Social Media Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).39 Commodity actualization produces resources that bolster both politics and economies of visibility.40 This also demonstrates how commodity actualization is part of the process through which economies of visibility are created and sustained since the focus is on the way in which individuals, through their purchasing choices, can rearticulate themselves as “authentic” subjects.41 Jeffrey Montez de Oca, Sherry Mason, and Sung Ahn, “Consuming for the Greater Good: ‘Woke’ Commercials in Sports Media,” Communication & Sport (2020): 1–23.42 Team INDIE, “Meet the LGBTQ+ Berliners Finding Strength in Sport,” INDIE Magazine, July 16, 2019, https://indie-mag.com/2019/07/nike-be-true/.43 The language of ownership is reflected in athlete coming out statements. For example, when asked to justify why he came out when he did, Michael Sam said “I wanted to own my truth.”44 C.L. Cole, “American Jordan: P.L.A.Y., Consensus, and Punishment,” Sociology of Sport Journal 13 (1996): 366–97; Lyndsay M. C. Hayhurst, and Courtney Szto, “Corporatizating Activism Through Sport-Focused Social Justice? Investigating Nike’s Corporate Responsibility Initiatives in Sport for Development and Peace,” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 40, no. 6 (2016): 522–44; Montez de Oca, Mason, and Ahn, “Consuming for the Greater Good”, 7.; and Szto, “Saving Lives,” 2013.45 Ana Swanson, “Nike and Coca-Cola Lobby Against Xinjiang Forced Labor Bill.” New York Times, January 20, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/29/business/economy/nike-coca-cola-xinjiang-forced-labor-bill.html.46 While Nike has made strides to provide better working conditions in its overseas factories after reports in the 1990s identified unsafe and abusive working conditions, there are still problematic wage discrepancies in its business model as evidenced by Nike’s $6 billion annual expenditures on athlete endorsements and sponsorships compared to the €82–200 per month they pay the workers who make these items, of whom over 80% are women in Indonesia.47 Samantha King, “An All-Consuming Cause: Breast Cancer, Corporate Philanthropy, and the Market for Generosity,” Social Text, 19, No. 4 (2001): 115–43.48 Archie B. Carroll and Kareem M. Shabana, “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, no. 1 (2010): 85–105.49 Nike, “Pride Community Grants,” 2021, https://purpose.nike.com/pride-community-grants.50 In 2018 alone, 78% of political contributions from Nike’s PAC went to Republicans just a year after the Republican-controlled House, Senate, and White House rolled back protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, which had a disproportionately negative affect on transgender individuals. Nihal Krishan, “Despite Recent ‘Progressive’ Ads with Colin Kaepernick, Nike Gives More Money to Republicans Than Democrats,” Open Secrets, September 12, 2018, https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/09/colin-kaepernick-nike-gives/; OpenSecrets “Nike Inc.,” 2021, https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/nike-inc/recipients?candscycle=2020&id=D000027998&toprecipscycle=2018.51 iSpot.TV., “Nike TV Commercial, ‘Unlimited Courage’ Featuring Chris Mosier,” https://www.ispot.tv/ad/ARNT/nike-unlimited-courage-featuring-chris-mosier.52 Nike, “Unlimited Courage” [Television commercial], Vimeo (2016), https://vimeo.com/177952174.53 Brody, Evan, D. Travers Scott, and Katrina L. Pariera. “LGBTQ+ Collegiate Athletes and the Double Bind: Insights From the Experiences of Out Varsity Athletes.” International Journal of Communication 16 (2022): 21.54 John D’Emilio, Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 1.55 Gray, “Subject(ed),” 772.56 Gray, “Subject(ed),” 2013.57 Julia Himberg, The New Gay for Pay: The Sexual Politics of American Television Production (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2017), 4; Mia Fischer et al., “A Conversation: Queer Digital Media Resources and Research,” First Monday 23, no. 7 (2018), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i7.9255. Emphasis in original.58 Fischer, Terrorizing Gender, 4.59 Mia Fischer, “Piss(ed): The Biopolitics of the Bathroom,” Communication, Culture & Critique, 12, no. 3 (2019): 397–415; Owen, D.W. Hargie, David H. Mitchell, and Ian J.A. Somerville, “‘People Have a Knack of Making You Feel Excluded if They Catch on to Your Difference’: Transgender Experiences of Exclusion in Sport,” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 52, no. 2 (2019): 223–39; Shannon S.C. Herrick and Lindsay R. Duncan, “A Qualitative Exploration of LGBTQ+ and Intersecting Identities Within Physical Activity Contexts,” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 40 (2018): 325–35; and Ellen D.B. Riggle, “Experiences of a Gender Non-Conforming Lesbian in the ‘Ladies’ (Rest) Room,” Journal of Lesbian Studies 22, no. 4, (2018): 482–95, among others.60 Human Rights Campaign, “Understanding the Transgender Community” (n.d.), https://www.hrc.org/resources/understanding-the-transgender-community.61 This also minimizes the “double burden” that accompanies individuals such as Mosier who must not only fight discrimination as the first in their respective industry but are then expected to be a national spokesperson tasked with representing an entire community. Thomas, Gazing, 2020.62 Katherine L. Lavelle, “‘Plays Like a Guy’: A Rhetorical Analysis of Brittney Griner in Sports Media,” Journal of Sports Media 9, no. 2, (2014): 115–31.63 John M. Sloop, “‘This is Not Natural’: Caster Semenya’s Gender Threats,” Critical Studies in Media Communication 29, no. 2 (2012): 81–96.64 Mia Fischer and Jennifer McClearen, “Transgender Athletes and the Queer Art of Athletic Failure,” Communication and Sport 8, no. 2 (2020): 154.65 Moya Bailey, “Misogynoir in Medical Media: On Caster Semenya and R. Kelly,” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 2, no. 2 (2016): 1–31; and Sarah J. Blithe and Jenna N. Hanchey, “The Discursive Emergence of Gendered Physiological Discrimination in Sex Verification Testing,” Women’s Studies in Communication 38, no. 4 (2015): 486–506.66 Nike, “Nobody Wins Alone” [Television commercial], YouTube, (2019), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ck76-4lAgV4.67 The ruling only applied to “middle distance” events so Semenya, and others, were considered female-enough to run shorter or longer distances, such as the 100-, 200-, and 3000-meter races, but not the specific races for which they had trained and competed in previously.68 One of Semenya’s former competitors, Madeleine Pape, has reflected on her path as one of those “quick to join the chorus of voices around me that were beginning to accuse Semenya of having an unfair advantage” to now seeing Semenya as “a good thing for women’s sport.” She further discusses how Semenya’s sexual identity and non-traditional gender expression played into long-standing biases about femininity and heterosexuality in Track & Field and states that “it is very fair to be asking why women of color from the global south and from sub-Saharan Africa, in particular, are overrepresented amongst the women who’ve been accused of having an unfair advantage.” Lulu Garcia-Navarro, “Olympic Runner who Once Competed Against Caster Semenya Weights in on Testosterone Ruling,” May 5, 2019, National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2019/05/05/720376207/olympic-runner-who-once-competed-against-caster-semenya-weighs-in-on-testosteron.69 National Public Radio, “Wave of Bills to Block Trans Athletes Has no Basis in Science, Researcher Says,” NPR, March 18, 2021, https://www.npr.org/2021/03/18/978716732/wave-of-new-bills-say-trans-athletes-have-an-unfair-edge-what-does-the-science-s.70 Wyatt Ronan, “2021 Officially Becomes Worst Year in Recent History for LGBTQ State Legislative Attacks as Unprecedented Number of States Enact Record-Shattering Number of Anti-LGBTQ Measures Into Law,” Human Rights Campaign, May 7, 2021, https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/2021-officially-becomes-worst-year-in-recent-history-for-lgbtq-state-legislative-attacks-as-unprecedented-number-of-states-enact-record-shattering-number-of-anti-lgbtq-measures-into-law; Cullen Peele, “Roundup of Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation Advancing in States Across the Country,” Human Rights Campaign, May 23, 2023, https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/roundup-of-anti-lgbtq-legislation-advancing-in-states-across-the-country; Movement Advancement Project, “Bans on Transgender Youth.”71 Gray, Subject(ed), 774. Emphasis in original.72 Human Rights Watch, “‘They’re Chasing us Away From Sport’: Human Rights Violations in Sex Testing of Elite Women Athletes,” December 4, 2020, https://www.hrw.org/report/2020/12/04/theyre-chasing-us-away-sport/human-rights-violations-sex-testing-elite-women.73 Nike, “This is Our Time” [Television commercial], YouTube, (2020), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2rC_iOLfcY.74 Nike, “Radical Inclusivity” [Television commercial], (2021).75 Nike News, “The 2021 Be True Collection Brings the Energy, One Story (And Patch) at a Time,” June 4, 2021, https://news.nike.com/news/nike-be-true-collection-2021-official-images-release-date.76 Ibid.77 Ibid.78 Courtney M. Cox, “Haram Hoops? FIBA, Nike, and the Hijab’s Half-Court Defense” in Communication and Sport, ed. Michael Butterworth (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021): 199–215.79 Ronan, 2021 Officially Becomes, 2021.80 Mary L. Gray, Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America (New York: New York University Press, 2009).
品牌是真实的:能见度政治和耐克与LGBTQ+社区的接触
在这篇文章中,作者考察了耐克通过其Be True产品和活动与LGBTQ +社区的接触。对耐克关于该系列的官方声明及其广告活动的分析,揭示了耐克如何鼓励LGBTQ +个人的曝光,而不关心这样做的物质后果。作者还揭示了耐克如何将理想化的身份特征的体现捆绑到其产品中,这一过程被称为商品实现化。其目标是强调市场活动在取代传统行动主义方面所发挥的作用,并使可见性、真相和平等之间的不稳定关系变得清晰。关键词:LGBTQ+可见度体育媒体新自由主义商品行动主义作者感谢霍利斯·格里芬博士和尼基·刘易斯博士对本文的周到反馈和建议,以及匿名评论者的慷慨推荐。作者还要感谢Robin M. Boylorn博士和Cassidy D. Ellis博士在出版过程中提供的编辑指导和有益的反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 LGBTQ+是指所有因性和/或性别认同而被边缘化的个体。当使用其他术语时,这样做是为了尊重被引用的个人或使用不同首字母缩略词的特定职位的使用。2012年是Be True开始的一年,也是活跃的职业运动员开始“出柜”的一年,比如:梅根·拉皮诺(2012)、布兰妮·格里纳(2013)、杰森·柯林斯(2013)和迈克尔·萨姆(2014)GLAAD,“加速接受2023”,2023年,https://assets.glaad.org/m/23036571f611c54/original/Accelerating-Acceptance-2023.pdf;GLAAD,“加速接受2018”,2018,https://www.glaad.org/files/aa/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202018.pdf;Nadia Suleman:《GLAAD研究显示,美国年轻人对LGBTQ社区越来越“不舒服”》,《时代》,2019年6月25日,https://time.com/5613276/glaad-acceptance-index-lgbtq-survey/;GLAAD,“加速接受2020”,2020年,https://www.glaad.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating%20Acceptance%202020.pdf;人权项目,《遭受攻击的LGBTQ+美国人:对2023年州立法会议的报告与反思》,2023,https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Anti-LGBTQ-Legislation-Impact-Report.pdf;运动进步项目,“禁止跨性别青年参与体育运动”,2023,https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/sports_participation_bans.3在这篇文章中,我故意使用社区,而不是社区,来表明LGBTQ+个人的身体和经历的多样性。自成立以来,耐克以各种方式为产品线命名,如BETRUE, # BETRUE, BETRUE和BeTrue。在出版的时候,耐克在他们的书面新闻稿中使用Be True。除非引号另有说明,否则我始终使用这种格式赫尔曼·格雷,《主体(编)与认可》,《美国季刊》,第65期。4 (2013): 773;Kim Toffoletti和Holly Thorpe,《女性运动员在社交媒体上的自我表现:对新自由主义营销策略的女权主义分析》,《女性主义与心理学》,第28期。例如,Roopali Mukherjee和Sarah Banet-Weiser,《商品行动主义导论:新自由主义时代的文化抵抗》(纽约:纽约大学出版社,2012),1 - 17;Francesca Sobande,“唤醒洗涤:‘交叉的’女性广告和‘唤醒的’勇敢品牌”,《欧洲营销杂志》,54,第1期。11 (2019): 2723-45;“我们为女性赋权流血”:中介伦理、商品女性主义与女性主义政治的矛盾,”《传播与批判/文化研究》第16期。2(2019): 143;6该公司报告称,2019年净收入为57亿美元。西莉亚·卢里:《品牌:全球经济的标志》(伦敦:劳特利奇,2004)Philip Kotler和Nancy Lee,《企业社会责任:为你的公司和事业做得最好》(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005), 3.9 Geoffrey B. Sprinkle和Laureen A. Maines,《企业社会责任的收益和成本》,《商业视野》,53 (2010):445-53;“社会维度下的广告:非经济标准的作用”,《市场营销学报》,第6期。4 (1996): 71-87;Menno D. T. de Jong和Mark van der Meer,“它如何适合?”罗纳德·阿尔索普,“企业慈善事业的风险:吹捧好项目冒犯了公众,但沉默被认为是不作为。”《华尔街日报》2002年1月16日;Alina Dizik,《高管教育:传授黄金法则》 37 Sarah Banet-Weiser,正宗™:品牌文化中的矛盾心理政治(纽约:纽约大学出版社,2012);39 . Joel Penney:《公民营销:在社交媒体时代促进政治观点》(纽约:牛津大学出版社,2017)商品实现化所产生的资源,在政治上和经济上都支持可见性41 .这也表明商品实现化是创造和维持可见性经济的过程的一部分,因为重点是个人通过其购买选择可以将自己重新表述为“真实的”主体的方式Jeffrey Montez de Oca, Sherry Mason和Sung Ahn,“为更大的利益消费:体育媒体中的“觉醒”广告”,Communication & Sport(2020): 1-23.42团队INDIE,“与LGBTQ+柏林人见面,在体育中找到力量”,INDIE杂志,2019年7月16日,https://indie-mag.com/2019/07/nike-be-true/.43所有权的语言反映在运动员的声明中。例如,当被问及他为什么出柜时,迈克尔·山姆说:“我想承认我的真相。44 C.L. Cole,“美国乔丹:P.L.A.Y,共识和惩罚”,《体育社会学杂志》13 (1996):366-97;lindsay M. C. Hayhurst和Courtney Szto,《通过以体育为中心的社会正义实现企业化行动主义?》调查耐克在体育发展与和平中的企业责任倡议,“体育与社会问题杂志40,no。6 (2016): 522-44;蒙特兹·德·奥卡,梅森和安,“为更大的利益消费”,第7期;Ana Swanson,“耐克和可口可乐游说反对新疆强迫劳动法案”。《纽约时报》2021年1月20日报道https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/29/business/economy/nike-coca-cola-xinjiang-forced-labor-bill.html.46虽然耐克在其海外工厂提供更好的工作条件方面取得了长足进步,但在20世纪90年代的报道中发现了不安全和虐待性的工作条件,在其商业模式中,仍然存在着有问题的工资差异,耐克每年在运动员代言和赞助上的支出为60亿美元,而他们每月支付给制造这些物品的工人的工资为82-200欧元,其中80%以上是印度尼西亚的女性。47 Samantha King,“一个消耗一切的事业:乳腺癌,企业慈善事业和慷慨的市场”,社会文本,19,No. 4(2001)。[115 - 43]张晓明,“企业社会责任的概念、研究与实践”,《管理研究》,第12期。1(2010): 85-105.49耐克,“骄傲社区拨款”,2021,https://purpose.nike.com/pride-community-grants.50仅在2018年,耐克政治行动委员会78%的政治捐款流向了共和党人,而就在一年前,共和党控制的参众两院和白宫取消了对LGBTQ+群体的保护,这对跨性别者产生了不成比例的负面影响。Nihal Krishan,“尽管最近Colin Kaepernick的‘进步’广告,耐克给共和党人的钱比给民主党人的钱更多”,2018年9月12日,https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/09/colin-kaepernick-nike-gives/;OpenSecrets“耐克公司”,2021年,https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/nike-inc/recipients?candscycle=2020&id=D000027998&toprecipscycle=2018.51 iSpot.TV。,“耐克电视广告,'无限的勇气'克里斯·莫西耶,”https://www.ispot.tv/ad/ARNT/nike-unlimited-courage-featuring-chris-mosier.52耐克,“无限的勇气”[电视广告],Vimeo (2016), https://vimeo.com/177952174.53布罗迪,埃文,D.特拉弗斯斯科特,和卡特里娜L.帕里埃拉。“LGBTQ+大学运动员和双重困境:来自我们大学运动员经历的见解。”《国际传播杂志》16(2022):21.54约翰·德埃米利奥,性政治,性社区:美国同性恋少数群体的形成,1940-1970(芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,1983),1.55格雷,“主题(编辑)”,772.56格雷,“主题(编辑)”,2013.57朱莉娅·希姆伯格,新同性恋报酬:美国电视制作的性政治(奥斯汀:德克萨斯大学出版社,2017),4;米娅·费舍尔等人,“对话:酷儿数字媒体资源和研究”,第23周一,第23期。7 (2018), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i7.9255。原文重音米娅·费希尔,《尿(编):卫生间的生命政治》,《传播,文化与批判》,第12期。3 (2019): 397-415;Owen, D.W. Hargie, David H. Mitchell和Ian J.A. Somerville,“如果人们发现了你的不同,他们就会让你感到被排斥”:跨性别者在体育运动中被排斥的经历”,《国际体育社会学评论》第52期。2 (2019): 223-39;Shannon S.C. Herrick和Lindsay R。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies (CC/CS) is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. CC/CS publishes original scholarship that situates culture as a site of struggle and communication as an enactment and discipline of power. The journal features critical inquiry that cuts across academic and theoretical boundaries. CC/CS welcomes a variety of methods including textual, discourse, and rhetorical analyses alongside auto/ethnographic, narrative, and poetic inquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信