Agency and collaboration: an analysis of the relationship between government-certified social enterprises and the public sector in South Korea

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Casper Hendrik Claassen, Eric Bidet, Junki Kim, Yeanhee Choi
{"title":"Agency and collaboration: an analysis of the relationship between government-certified social enterprises and the public sector in South Korea","authors":"Casper Hendrik Claassen, Eric Bidet, Junki Kim, Yeanhee Choi","doi":"10.1108/ijpsm-03-2023-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Public sector institutional entrepreneurship efforts may contribute to addressing social challenges by creating an enabling regulatory environment that promotes social enterprise formation and fosters complementarity between the public sector and social enterprises. The outcomes of such public sector institutional entrepreneurship are explored in this study. To assess the outcomes of such public sector initiatives in South Korea, the perspectives of executives ( n = 40) of government-certified social enterprises are assessed. Design/methodology/approach Several research methodologies were combined, including purposive sampling with an 11-point Likert scale, hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis. The literature on government–nonprofit relations as well as public sector institutional entrepreneurship was leveraged. Findings This research results indicate that the enabling regulatory environment with entrenched funding and incubation mechanisms produces mixed-to-positive outcomes if framed with reference to public sector–social enterprise complementarity. The authors identified three perspective-based ideal types that have differential views of isomorphic regulatory pressures, the efficacy of incubation and scaling programs, participation in policymaking and other aspects of public sector patronage. Originality/value This study contributes to relating the literature on public sector institutional entrepreneurship and government–third sector relations by empirically assessing how social enterprises attracted by government demand-side signaling to become certified as social enterprises encounter and perceive an ostensibly enabling regulatory ecosystem, with its derivative policies and mechanisms, crafted by the public sector.","PeriodicalId":47437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","volume":" 57","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-03-2023-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Public sector institutional entrepreneurship efforts may contribute to addressing social challenges by creating an enabling regulatory environment that promotes social enterprise formation and fosters complementarity between the public sector and social enterprises. The outcomes of such public sector institutional entrepreneurship are explored in this study. To assess the outcomes of such public sector initiatives in South Korea, the perspectives of executives ( n = 40) of government-certified social enterprises are assessed. Design/methodology/approach Several research methodologies were combined, including purposive sampling with an 11-point Likert scale, hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis. The literature on government–nonprofit relations as well as public sector institutional entrepreneurship was leveraged. Findings This research results indicate that the enabling regulatory environment with entrenched funding and incubation mechanisms produces mixed-to-positive outcomes if framed with reference to public sector–social enterprise complementarity. The authors identified three perspective-based ideal types that have differential views of isomorphic regulatory pressures, the efficacy of incubation and scaling programs, participation in policymaking and other aspects of public sector patronage. Originality/value This study contributes to relating the literature on public sector institutional entrepreneurship and government–third sector relations by empirically assessing how social enterprises attracted by government demand-side signaling to become certified as social enterprises encounter and perceive an ostensibly enabling regulatory ecosystem, with its derivative policies and mechanisms, crafted by the public sector.
代理与协作:韩国政府认证社会企业与公共部门关系分析
公共部门机构型企业家精神的努力可以通过创造有利的管理环境促进社会企业的形成和促进公共部门与社会企业之间的互补性,从而有助于解决社会挑战。本研究探讨了这种公共部门机构创业的结果。为了评估韩国这些公共部门举措的结果,对政府认证的社会企业高管(n = 40)的观点进行了评估。设计/方法/方法结合了几种研究方法,包括11点李克特量表的目的抽样、分层聚类和主成分分析。利用了政府与非营利关系以及公共部门机构企业家精神方面的文献。研究结果表明,如果考虑到公共部门与社会企业的互补性,扶持性监管环境以及根深蒂固的资金和孵化机制将产生好坏参半的积极结果。作者确定了三种基于视角的理想类型,它们对同构监管压力、孵化和规模计划的效力、参与政策制定和公共部门赞助的其他方面有不同的看法。原创性/价值本研究通过实证评估社会企业如何被政府需求侧信号吸引成为社会企业,从而遇到并感知到一个表面上有利的监管生态系统,以及由公共部门制定的衍生政策和机制,从而有助于将有关公共部门机构企业家精神和政府-第三部门关系的文献联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Sector Management (IJPSM) publishes academic articles on the management, governance, and reform of public sector organizations around the world, aiming to provide an accessible and valuable resource for academics and public managers alike. IJPSM covers the full range of public management research including studies of organizations, public finances, performance management, Human Resources Management, strategy, leadership, accountability, integrity, collaboration, e-government, procurement, and more. IJPSM encourages scholars to publish their empirical research and is particularly interested in comparative findings. IJPSM is open to articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信