Anticoagulation-associated bleeding in patients screened for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation vs. usual care – A post-hoc analysis from the LOOP study

Emilie Katrine Kongebro, Søren Zöga Diederichsen, Lucas Yixi Xing, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Claus Graff, Søren Højberg, Morten Salling Olesen, Derk Krieger, Axel Brandes, Lars Koeber, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
{"title":"Anticoagulation-associated bleeding in patients screened for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation vs. usual care – A post-hoc analysis from the LOOP study","authors":"Emilie Katrine Kongebro, Søren Zöga Diederichsen, Lucas Yixi Xing, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Claus Graff, Søren Højberg, Morten Salling Olesen, Derk Krieger, Axel Brandes, Lars Koeber, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen","doi":"10.1055/a-2202-4296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence is rising, however data on the bleeding risks associated with detection of subclinical AF are needed. Objective To determine the bleeding increment associated with implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for subclinical AF and subsequent anticoagulation initiation compared to usual care. Methods This post-hoc study utilized LOOP trial data from 6004 elderly patients with stroke risks randomised to either ILR (n=1503) or usual care (n=4503). The mean follow-up time was 64.5 months, and none were lost to follow-up. The primary exposure was the initiation of oral anticoagulation, and the main outcome was the risk of major bleeding events following initiation of oral anticoagulants (OAC), determined by time-dependent cox regression. Secondly, we investigated antithrombotic prescription patterns and major bleeding events after antiplatelets treatment and in subgroups. Results OAC was initiated in 1019 participants with a mean age (yrs) at 78.8 (±4.67) in Control vs. 77.0 (±4.84) in ILR, p<0.0001. All cases of OAC discontinuation reached 202, and in AF-patients (n=910) alone paused 105 (72%) paticipants temporarily OAC and 40 (28%) ended OAC treatment completelety during follow-up. Major bleeding events totalled 221 (3.7%). Forty-seven major bleeding events followed an OAC initiation in 1019 participants (4.6%); 26 vs. 21 events in the control and ILR group respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for major bleeding after OAC initiation compared to before was 2.08 (1.50-2.90) p<0.0001 overall; 2.81 (1.82-4.34) p<0.0001 for Control and 1.32 (0.78-2.23) p=0.31 for the ILR group (p=0.07 for interaction). Antiplatelet treatment resulted in an overall adjusted HR of 1.3 (0.96-1.75) p=0.09. For OAC-users aged ≥75 years in the ILR group, the rate of major bleeding was 1.73 (0.92-2.96) compared to 0.84 (0.36-1.66) for an age <75 years, and the rate of the corresponding Control subgroup aged ≥75 years was 2.20 (1.23-3.63) compared to 1.64 (0.82-2.93) for an age <75 years. Conclusion The individual risk of major bleeding increased two-fold after initiation of oral anticoagulation for all patients in this study. However, the patients screened for subclinical AF did not have a higher bleeding risk after initiation of anticoagulation compared to those in usual care.","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2202-4296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence is rising, however data on the bleeding risks associated with detection of subclinical AF are needed. Objective To determine the bleeding increment associated with implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for subclinical AF and subsequent anticoagulation initiation compared to usual care. Methods This post-hoc study utilized LOOP trial data from 6004 elderly patients with stroke risks randomised to either ILR (n=1503) or usual care (n=4503). The mean follow-up time was 64.5 months, and none were lost to follow-up. The primary exposure was the initiation of oral anticoagulation, and the main outcome was the risk of major bleeding events following initiation of oral anticoagulants (OAC), determined by time-dependent cox regression. Secondly, we investigated antithrombotic prescription patterns and major bleeding events after antiplatelets treatment and in subgroups. Results OAC was initiated in 1019 participants with a mean age (yrs) at 78.8 (±4.67) in Control vs. 77.0 (±4.84) in ILR, p<0.0001. All cases of OAC discontinuation reached 202, and in AF-patients (n=910) alone paused 105 (72%) paticipants temporarily OAC and 40 (28%) ended OAC treatment completelety during follow-up. Major bleeding events totalled 221 (3.7%). Forty-seven major bleeding events followed an OAC initiation in 1019 participants (4.6%); 26 vs. 21 events in the control and ILR group respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for major bleeding after OAC initiation compared to before was 2.08 (1.50-2.90) p<0.0001 overall; 2.81 (1.82-4.34) p<0.0001 for Control and 1.32 (0.78-2.23) p=0.31 for the ILR group (p=0.07 for interaction). Antiplatelet treatment resulted in an overall adjusted HR of 1.3 (0.96-1.75) p=0.09. For OAC-users aged ≥75 years in the ILR group, the rate of major bleeding was 1.73 (0.92-2.96) compared to 0.84 (0.36-1.66) for an age <75 years, and the rate of the corresponding Control subgroup aged ≥75 years was 2.20 (1.23-3.63) compared to 1.64 (0.82-2.93) for an age <75 years. Conclusion The individual risk of major bleeding increased two-fold after initiation of oral anticoagulation for all patients in this study. However, the patients screened for subclinical AF did not have a higher bleeding risk after initiation of anticoagulation compared to those in usual care.
无症状房颤筛查患者的抗凝相关出血与常规护理- LOOP研究的事后分析
背景:房颤(AF)的患病率正在上升,但是需要与亚临床房颤检测相关的出血风险数据。目的探讨与常规治疗相比,植入式循环记录仪(ILR)筛查亚临床房颤及后续抗凝治疗相关的出血增量。方法:这项事后研究利用了来自6004例卒中风险老年患者的LOOP试验数据,这些患者随机分为ILR组(n=1503)和常规护理组(n=4503)。平均随访时间64.5个月,无失访病例。主要暴露是口服抗凝剂的开始,主要结局是口服抗凝剂开始后大出血事件的风险(OAC),由时间依赖性cox回归确定。其次,我们调查了抗血小板治疗后的抗血栓处方模式和主要出血事件。结果:1019名参与者开始OAC,对照组的平均年龄为78.8(±4.67)岁,ILR的平均年龄为77.0(±4.84)岁,p < 0.0001。所有OAC停药的病例达到202例,在af患者(n=910)中,仅105例(72%)患者暂停了OAC治疗,40例(28%)患者在随访期间完全结束了OAC治疗。主要出血事件221例(3.7%)。1019名受试者(4.6%)接受OAC治疗后发生47起大出血事件;对照组和ILR组分别为26例和21例。OAC发生后大出血的风险比(HR)为2.08(1.50-2.90),总体为0.0001;对照组为0.0001,ILR组为1.32 (0.78-2.23)p=0.31(相互作用p=0.07)。抗血小板治疗导致总校正HR为1.3 (0.96-1.75)p=0.09。年龄≥75岁的ILR组oac使用者大出血率为1.73(0.92-2.96),75岁组为0.84(0.36-1.66),相应年龄≥75岁的对照亚组为2.20(1.23-3.63),75岁组为1.64(0.82-2.93)。结论本研究中所有患者口服抗凝后大出血的个体风险增加了2倍。然而,筛查亚临床房颤的患者在开始抗凝治疗后出血风险并不高于常规治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信