O-16 Intersectionality and palliative care – a rapid review

Briony Hudson, Fiona Taylor, Devi Sagar, Rini Jones, Alison Penny, Ruth Driscoll, Dominic Carter, Sam Royston
{"title":"O-16 Intersectionality and palliative care – a rapid review","authors":"Briony Hudson, Fiona Taylor, Devi Sagar, Rini Jones, Alison Penny, Ruth Driscoll, Dominic Carter, Sam Royston","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-hunc.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3> Intersectionality is a concept that recognises the interconnected disadvantage and marginalisation based on a person’s multiple characteristics and identities (Crenshaw. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;1989(1); Hankivsky, Grace, Hunting, et al. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(119)). We know that inequities in palliative care exist (Tobin, Rogers, Winterburn, et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022; 12(2), 142–151). Intersectionality provides an informative lens through which to explore how the multiple characteristics of a person may influence experiences towards the end of life (Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Marcu, Ream, et al. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e066637). <h3>Aim</h3> To examine and map the type and focus of research exploring intersectionality and access to palliative care, summarise existing literature and identify directions for future research. <h3>Methods</h3> Five online databases were searched for qualitative and quantitative studies, published in the last 10 years that explicitly explored the impact of intersectionality between two or more characteristics for people accessing palliative or end of life care or advance care planning (ACP). <h3>Results</h3> Seven eligible papers were identified. Evidence of intersectional impacts were found. Four studies explored the impact of intersectionality on access to and attitudes towards ACP (age and ethnicity; and sexuality, gender and age). Two explored intersectionality and access to care (age and sexuality; ethnicity and gender), one investigated intersectionality (ethnicity and gender) and quality of care in the last year of life. Inconsistent operationalisations of intersectionality complicated the identification of eligible papers. <h3>Conclusions</h3> There is limited evidence exploring the complicated interactions between the different elements of a person and their experiences towards the end of life. Studying intersectionality is complex and challenged by methodological issues and data limitations. A more robust definition of intersectionality, and an agreed theoretical framework will facilitate the sharing and translation of knowledge in this field. Improvements in the quantity and quality of data available, regarding characteristics linked to inequity would enable more nuanced analyses of intersectionality. Coproducing research and services with a diverse range of people could help identify intersections that defy existing analysis, and improve care and future research.","PeriodicalId":19619,"journal":{"name":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","volume":"66 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-hunc.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intersectionality is a concept that recognises the interconnected disadvantage and marginalisation based on a person’s multiple characteristics and identities (Crenshaw. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989;1989(1); Hankivsky, Grace, Hunting, et al. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(119)). We know that inequities in palliative care exist (Tobin, Rogers, Winterburn, et al. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022; 12(2), 142–151). Intersectionality provides an informative lens through which to explore how the multiple characteristics of a person may influence experiences towards the end of life (Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Marcu, Ream, et al. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e066637).

Aim

To examine and map the type and focus of research exploring intersectionality and access to palliative care, summarise existing literature and identify directions for future research.

Methods

Five online databases were searched for qualitative and quantitative studies, published in the last 10 years that explicitly explored the impact of intersectionality between two or more characteristics for people accessing palliative or end of life care or advance care planning (ACP).

Results

Seven eligible papers were identified. Evidence of intersectional impacts were found. Four studies explored the impact of intersectionality on access to and attitudes towards ACP (age and ethnicity; and sexuality, gender and age). Two explored intersectionality and access to care (age and sexuality; ethnicity and gender), one investigated intersectionality (ethnicity and gender) and quality of care in the last year of life. Inconsistent operationalisations of intersectionality complicated the identification of eligible papers.

Conclusions

There is limited evidence exploring the complicated interactions between the different elements of a person and their experiences towards the end of life. Studying intersectionality is complex and challenged by methodological issues and data limitations. A more robust definition of intersectionality, and an agreed theoretical framework will facilitate the sharing and translation of knowledge in this field. Improvements in the quantity and quality of data available, regarding characteristics linked to inequity would enable more nuanced analyses of intersectionality. Coproducing research and services with a diverse range of people could help identify intersections that defy existing analysis, and improve care and future research.
O-16交叉性与姑息治疗-快速回顾
交叉性是一个概念,它承认基于一个人的多重特征和身份的相互关联的劣势和边缘化(克伦肖)。芝加哥大学法律论坛,1989;1989(1);汉科夫斯基,格蕾丝,亨特等人。国际公平卫生,2014;13(119))。我们知道在姑息治疗方面存在不公平现象(Tobin, Rogers, Winterburn等)。BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022;12(2), 142 - 151)。交叉性提供了一个信息透镜,通过它来探索一个人的多重特征如何影响生命结束时的经历(Estupiñán Fdez de Mesa, Marcu, Ream等)。英国医学杂志。2023;13:e066637)。目的分析和绘制研究交叉性与姑息治疗可及性的类型和重点,总结现有文献并确定未来的研究方向。方法检索5个在线数据库,检索近10年来发表的定性和定量研究,这些研究明确探讨了两种或两种以上特征之间的交叉性对人们获得姑息治疗或临终关怀或预先护理计划(ACP)的影响。结果筛选出7篇符合条件的论文。发现了交叉撞击的证据。四项研究探讨了交叉性对ACP获取和态度的影响(年龄和种族;性,性别和年龄)。其中两篇探讨了交叉性和获得护理的机会(年龄和性别;种族和性别),一项调查了生命最后一年的交叉性(种族和性别)和护理质量。不一致的交叉性操作使合格论文的识别变得复杂。研究一个人的不同因素与他们临终前的经历之间复杂的相互作用的证据有限。研究交叉性是复杂的,并受到方法问题和数据限制的挑战。对交叉性更有力的定义和商定的理论框架将促进这一领域知识的分享和翻译。改善与不平等有关的特征的现有数据的数量和质量,将能够对相互关系进行更细致的分析。与各种各样的人共同开展研究和服务,可以帮助识别无视现有分析的交叉点,并改善护理和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信