Until Justice Be Done: America's First Civil Rights Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction

Joseph Rathke
{"title":"Until Justice Be Done: America's First Civil Rights Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction","authors":"Joseph Rathke","doi":"10.5406/23283335.116.2.3.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the antebellum era, abolitionists, politicians, and Black activists in the United States fought to end slavery and demand racial justice. Along with renowned abolitionists and politicians, a diverse base of local activists and free Black people organized at the grassroots and agitated for legal rights at the state level. These proponents of civil rights formed organizations, produced publications, and created political parties to demand change in the face of fierce, often violent opposition.Earlier scholars of abolitionism and civil rights have worked to give agency to abolitionists and Black communities in this period, but a more complex problem remained. Historians have rarely interrogated the substantive mechanisms by which the fringe politics of abolitionism and racial equality worked their way into public consciousness and policy. In Until Justice Be Done, Kate Masur provides a stunning, provocative intervention to address this question: she argues that struggles to demand legal rights for African Americans in the antebellum era constituted America's first civil rights movement.While American federalism and political opposition made efforts to achieve legal equality impractical on the national stage, Masur shows that activists waged remarkable campaigns for civil rights at the state level long before the Civil War and Reconstruction. Civil rights proponents demanded rights premised on the citizenship of free Black people in northern states. They challenged state laws that restricted the legal status and rights of Black residents, producing influential campaigns that made inroads into state politics. In the mid-nineteenth century, Illinois became a significant epicenter for local movement-building that confronted the state's Black Laws. Masur shows how political organizing to demand citizenship rights for Black people in Illinois fed into the broader ascendance of the Republican Party as an antislavery coalition, both locally and nationally. Going further, Masur demonstrates how local movements for civil rights expanded to confront unequal laws across state lines. Abolitionists and their allies drew on legal protections and principles of citizenship in free states to confront the legal abuse and wrongful imprisonment of free Black sailors passing through slave states.In her final chapters, Masur uses her analysis of this antebellum civil rights movement to forge a continuity between the struggles for liberation and equal rights that took place before the Civil War and in its aftermath. She notes how activist pressure exploited new opportunities for civil rights advancement created by the war, taking the fight against black codes and support for the right to vote to places like Washington, DC, where slavery had once been firmly established, even as the war raged on. In the aftermath of the war, the Republican coalition that pushed through the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment represented a continuation of this long civil rights tradition to demand racial equality.Masur's intervention is compelling in part because it moves beyond conceptualizing social movements as an abstract force. By framing antebellum civil rights as a tradition of social movement, Masur grounds abstract ideas about changes in public consciousness in the practice of active political struggle. She homes in on evidence of activism built up from the grassroots around concrete demands for political change. The political consciousness that allowed for a national shift toward civil rights and abolition had no abstract agency of its own, but instead took root in material acts of protest, petitioning, and organizing that were often deeply unpopular and even dangerous.Through this lens of grounded social action, Until Justice Be Done brings invaluable evidence of movement-building into the historical canon. Masur demonstrates that the civil rights movement built power not through broad demands for national abolition and legal equality alone, but through conflict over substantive legal tensions regarding the rights and status of Black citizens that activists and politicians exploited strategically to demand achievable gains for civil rights wherever possible. Campaigns to demand local citizenship rights, end Black laws, and protect Black migrants represented coherent, attainable demands that proponents of civil rights used to build a new politics through action. These more local struggles have been pushed to the background by focus on abolitionism and civil rights on the national stage, but Masur shows that they were integral parts of the process of organizing and activism that allowed an American politics of civil rights to take form. By examining demands for racial equality from the Revolution to Reconstruction as a continuous tradition of social activism, Kate Masur builds a story of political change that is impressively grounded in evidence and foregrounds the agency of activists, abolitionists, and Black communities as a formative social force.","PeriodicalId":17416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society (1998-)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society (1998-)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23283335.116.2.3.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the antebellum era, abolitionists, politicians, and Black activists in the United States fought to end slavery and demand racial justice. Along with renowned abolitionists and politicians, a diverse base of local activists and free Black people organized at the grassroots and agitated for legal rights at the state level. These proponents of civil rights formed organizations, produced publications, and created political parties to demand change in the face of fierce, often violent opposition.Earlier scholars of abolitionism and civil rights have worked to give agency to abolitionists and Black communities in this period, but a more complex problem remained. Historians have rarely interrogated the substantive mechanisms by which the fringe politics of abolitionism and racial equality worked their way into public consciousness and policy. In Until Justice Be Done, Kate Masur provides a stunning, provocative intervention to address this question: she argues that struggles to demand legal rights for African Americans in the antebellum era constituted America's first civil rights movement.While American federalism and political opposition made efforts to achieve legal equality impractical on the national stage, Masur shows that activists waged remarkable campaigns for civil rights at the state level long before the Civil War and Reconstruction. Civil rights proponents demanded rights premised on the citizenship of free Black people in northern states. They challenged state laws that restricted the legal status and rights of Black residents, producing influential campaigns that made inroads into state politics. In the mid-nineteenth century, Illinois became a significant epicenter for local movement-building that confronted the state's Black Laws. Masur shows how political organizing to demand citizenship rights for Black people in Illinois fed into the broader ascendance of the Republican Party as an antislavery coalition, both locally and nationally. Going further, Masur demonstrates how local movements for civil rights expanded to confront unequal laws across state lines. Abolitionists and their allies drew on legal protections and principles of citizenship in free states to confront the legal abuse and wrongful imprisonment of free Black sailors passing through slave states.In her final chapters, Masur uses her analysis of this antebellum civil rights movement to forge a continuity between the struggles for liberation and equal rights that took place before the Civil War and in its aftermath. She notes how activist pressure exploited new opportunities for civil rights advancement created by the war, taking the fight against black codes and support for the right to vote to places like Washington, DC, where slavery had once been firmly established, even as the war raged on. In the aftermath of the war, the Republican coalition that pushed through the 1866 Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment represented a continuation of this long civil rights tradition to demand racial equality.Masur's intervention is compelling in part because it moves beyond conceptualizing social movements as an abstract force. By framing antebellum civil rights as a tradition of social movement, Masur grounds abstract ideas about changes in public consciousness in the practice of active political struggle. She homes in on evidence of activism built up from the grassroots around concrete demands for political change. The political consciousness that allowed for a national shift toward civil rights and abolition had no abstract agency of its own, but instead took root in material acts of protest, petitioning, and organizing that were often deeply unpopular and even dangerous.Through this lens of grounded social action, Until Justice Be Done brings invaluable evidence of movement-building into the historical canon. Masur demonstrates that the civil rights movement built power not through broad demands for national abolition and legal equality alone, but through conflict over substantive legal tensions regarding the rights and status of Black citizens that activists and politicians exploited strategically to demand achievable gains for civil rights wherever possible. Campaigns to demand local citizenship rights, end Black laws, and protect Black migrants represented coherent, attainable demands that proponents of civil rights used to build a new politics through action. These more local struggles have been pushed to the background by focus on abolitionism and civil rights on the national stage, but Masur shows that they were integral parts of the process of organizing and activism that allowed an American politics of civil rights to take form. By examining demands for racial equality from the Revolution to Reconstruction as a continuous tradition of social activism, Kate Masur builds a story of political change that is impressively grounded in evidence and foregrounds the agency of activists, abolitionists, and Black communities as a formative social force.
直到正义得到伸张:美国第一次民权运动,从革命到重建
在南北战争前,美国的废奴主义者、政治家和黑人活动家为结束奴隶制和要求种族正义而斗争。除了著名的废奴主义者和政治家之外,由当地活动家和自由黑人组成的多元化基础在基层组织起来,在州一级为争取合法权利而奔走。这些民权运动的支持者成立组织,出版出版物,成立政党,在激烈的、经常是暴力的反对面前要求变革。在这一时期,早期的废奴主义和民权学者一直致力于为废奴主义者和黑人社区提供代理,但一个更复杂的问题仍然存在。历史学家很少探究废奴主义和种族平等的边缘政治如何进入公众意识和政策的实质机制。在《直到正义得到伸张》一书中,凯特·马苏尔(Kate Masur)提出了一个令人惊叹的、具有煽动性的介入来解决这个问题:她认为,内战前为非裔美国人争取合法权利的斗争构成了美国的第一次民权运动。虽然美国的联邦制和政治反对派使得在国家舞台上实现法律平等的努力变得不切实际,但马苏尔表明,早在内战和重建之前,活动家们就在州一级开展了引人注目的民权运动。民权倡导者要求以北方各州自由黑人的公民权为前提的权利。他们挑战限制黑人居民法律地位和权利的州法律,发起了有影响力的运动,并进入了州政治。在19世纪中期,伊利诺斯州成为当地运动建设的重要中心,反对该州的黑人法律。马苏尔展示了为伊利诺伊州黑人争取公民权的政治组织是如何在地方和全国范围内推动共和党作为反奴隶制联盟的广泛优势的。更进一步,马苏尔展示了地方民权运动是如何扩展到对抗各州不平等法律的。废奴主义者和他们的盟友利用自由州的法律保护和公民原则,来对抗对经过蓄奴州的自由黑人水手的法律虐待和非法监禁。在她的最后几章中,马苏尔用她对内战前民权运动的分析,在内战前和内战后的解放和平等权利斗争之间建立了一个连续性。她注意到激进分子的压力是如何利用战争带来的民权进步的新机会,将反对黑人法典的斗争和对投票权的支持带到了像华盛顿特区这样的地方,在那里,即使战争肆虐,奴隶制也曾经牢固地建立起来。战争结束后,共和党联盟推动通过了1866年的《民权法案》(Civil Rights Act)和《第十四修正案》(14th Amendment),延续了要求种族平等的民权传统。Masur的介入之所以引人注目,部分原因在于它超越了将社会运动概念化为一种抽象的力量。通过将内战前的民权运动作为一种社会运动的传统,马苏尔在积极的政治斗争实践中建立了关于公众意识变化的抽象概念。她关注的是基层围绕政治变革的具体要求而建立起来的行动主义的证据。允许全国转向民权和废奴的政治意识本身没有抽象的机构,而是植根于抗议、请愿和组织的物质行为,这些行为往往非常不受欢迎,甚至是危险的。通过这种基于社会行动的镜头,直到正义得到伸张,将运动建设的宝贵证据带入了历史经典。马苏尔表明,民权运动不仅仅是通过广泛要求废除种族隔离和法律平等来建立力量,而是通过与黑人公民的权利和地位有关的实质性法律紧张关系的冲突,活动家和政治家策略性地利用这些冲突来要求在任何可能的地方实现公民权利。要求地方公民权、废除黑人法律和保护黑人移民的运动代表了民权支持者通过行动建立新政治的连贯、可实现的要求。由于在国家舞台上对废奴主义和民权的关注,这些地方性的斗争被推到了次要地位,但马苏尔表明,它们是组织和行动主义过程中不可或缺的一部分,正是这些过程使美国民权政治得以形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信