Differentiated Learning Assessment Model to Improve Involvement of Special Needs Students in Inclusive Schools

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marlina Marlina, Grahita Kusumastuti, Ediyanto Ediyanto
{"title":"Differentiated Learning Assessment Model to Improve Involvement of Special Needs Students in Inclusive Schools","authors":"Marlina Marlina, Grahita Kusumastuti, Ediyanto Ediyanto","doi":"10.29333/iji.2023.16425a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inclusive education is the right of all students without exception. One of the learning strategies for the philosophy of inclusive education is differentiated learning. This study aims to develop differentiated learning assessment tools and carry them to the test in the field. The current study uses the Research & Development method, using the ADDIE approach model. Observation, documentation, the Likert scale, and questionnaires carried out data collection. The participants were 42 teachers and 17 experts for validated differentiated learning assessment tools. Then, the differentiated learning assessment tools were carried out to test in the field, 85 students with special needs from four inclusive schools in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Qualitative analysis was used to develop assessment instruments, while quantitative analysis was used to test instrument validation and measure students' level of involvement with special needs. The results showed that the differentiated learning assessment instrument consisted of four aspects, namely: (1) content, (2) process, (3) product, and (4) learning environment. The validity and reliability of learning assessment instruments are distinguished as being suitable for use with a high level of reliability. Teachers in inclusive schools can assess the readiness, interest, and learning profile of students with special needs. There was an increase in teacher skills in differentiated learning and the involvement of students with special needs in learning.","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16425a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inclusive education is the right of all students without exception. One of the learning strategies for the philosophy of inclusive education is differentiated learning. This study aims to develop differentiated learning assessment tools and carry them to the test in the field. The current study uses the Research & Development method, using the ADDIE approach model. Observation, documentation, the Likert scale, and questionnaires carried out data collection. The participants were 42 teachers and 17 experts for validated differentiated learning assessment tools. Then, the differentiated learning assessment tools were carried out to test in the field, 85 students with special needs from four inclusive schools in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Qualitative analysis was used to develop assessment instruments, while quantitative analysis was used to test instrument validation and measure students' level of involvement with special needs. The results showed that the differentiated learning assessment instrument consisted of four aspects, namely: (1) content, (2) process, (3) product, and (4) learning environment. The validity and reliability of learning assessment instruments are distinguished as being suitable for use with a high level of reliability. Teachers in inclusive schools can assess the readiness, interest, and learning profile of students with special needs. There was an increase in teacher skills in differentiated learning and the involvement of students with special needs in learning.
差别化学习评估模式促进特殊需要学生在全纳学校的参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Instruction
International Journal of Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
38.90%
发文量
244
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信