The role of clinical pulmonary infection score and some infection biomarkers in diagnosis and follow up in hospital acquired pneumonia

Seher Satar, Ayşın Şakar Coşkun, Tuğba Göktalay, Aylin Özgen Alpaydın, Fatma Taneli, Hörü Gazi, Sinem Akçalı, Pınar Çelik, Arzu Yorgancıoğlu
{"title":"The role of clinical pulmonary infection score and some infection biomarkers in diagnosis and follow up in hospital acquired pneumonia","authors":"Seher Satar, Ayşın Şakar Coşkun, Tuğba Göktalay, Aylin Özgen Alpaydın, Fatma Taneli, Hörü Gazi, Sinem Akçalı, Pınar Çelik, Arzu Yorgancıoğlu","doi":"10.51271/jopic-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Early diagnosis and treatment affect mortality in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Therefore, clinicians need some objective parameters for guiding treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the course of ‘‘clinical pulmonary infection score’’ (CPIS), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in patients under treatment as well as the relationship of these parameters with each other and mortality. Methods: This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study focused on cases of HAP in hospitalized patients. In patients with HAP; CPIS, CRP and PCT assays were assessed on the first day. Appropriate treatment was initiated according to Turkish Thoracic Society HAP Task Force recommendations. On the 3rd day, CPIS evaluation and on the 4th day CRP and PCT analysis were repeated. All the patients’ one month mortality rates were recorded. Results: Among the 25 patients, there were 14 females. The mean age was 66±15 years. The mean duration for HAP development was 9.4±8.2 days. With a cutt-off value of 65 for age CPIS, CRP, PCT, length of hospital stay and mortality rate was not found different (p>0.05), however as the age increased HAP development duration significantly decreased (r=-0.416, p=0.03). We demonstrated a significant change between the first and the follow-up values of fever (p=0.046), leukocyte (p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 (p=0.016), secretion presence (p<0.001), culture positivity (p<0.001) as well as total CPIS (p=0.030). However, there wasn’t a significant difference in CRP and PCT levels. We couldn’t show any relation between CPIS domains, total CPIS, CRP, PCT, HAP development duration and mortality rates. Conclusion: Monitoring HAP treatment according to CPIS was found better than CRP and PCT. However, these parameters had no effect on mortality. For more accurate comments, studies with more patients are needed.","PeriodicalId":497714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pulmonology and Intensive Care","volume":"59 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pulmonology and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/jopic-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Early diagnosis and treatment affect mortality in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Therefore, clinicians need some objective parameters for guiding treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the course of ‘‘clinical pulmonary infection score’’ (CPIS), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in patients under treatment as well as the relationship of these parameters with each other and mortality. Methods: This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study focused on cases of HAP in hospitalized patients. In patients with HAP; CPIS, CRP and PCT assays were assessed on the first day. Appropriate treatment was initiated according to Turkish Thoracic Society HAP Task Force recommendations. On the 3rd day, CPIS evaluation and on the 4th day CRP and PCT analysis were repeated. All the patients’ one month mortality rates were recorded. Results: Among the 25 patients, there were 14 females. The mean age was 66±15 years. The mean duration for HAP development was 9.4±8.2 days. With a cutt-off value of 65 for age CPIS, CRP, PCT, length of hospital stay and mortality rate was not found different (p>0.05), however as the age increased HAP development duration significantly decreased (r=-0.416, p=0.03). We demonstrated a significant change between the first and the follow-up values of fever (p=0.046), leukocyte (p<0.001), PaO2/FiO2 (p=0.016), secretion presence (p<0.001), culture positivity (p<0.001) as well as total CPIS (p=0.030). However, there wasn’t a significant difference in CRP and PCT levels. We couldn’t show any relation between CPIS domains, total CPIS, CRP, PCT, HAP development duration and mortality rates. Conclusion: Monitoring HAP treatment according to CPIS was found better than CRP and PCT. However, these parameters had no effect on mortality. For more accurate comments, studies with more patients are needed.
临床肺部感染评分及部分感染生物标志物在医院获得性肺炎诊断及随访中的作用
目的:早期诊断和治疗影响医院获得性肺炎(HAP)的死亡率。因此,临床医生需要一些客观参数来指导治疗。本研究的目的是确定在治疗患者的“临床肺部感染评分”(CPIS)、c反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT)的病程,以及这些参数与死亡率的关系。方法:这项单中心、前瞻性、横断面研究集中于住院患者的HAP病例。HAP患者;第一天进行CPIS、CRP和PCT检测。根据土耳其胸科学会HAP工作组的建议开始适当的治疗。第3天再次进行CPIS评价,第4天再次进行CRP和PCT分析。记录所有患者一个月的死亡率。结果:25例患者中,女性14例。平均年龄66±15岁。HAP发生的平均持续时间为9.4±8.2天。年龄CPIS、CRP、PCT、住院时间和死亡率的截断值均为65,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),但随着年龄的增加,HAP病程显著降低(r=-0.416, p=0.03)。我们证实了首次和随访期间发热(p=0.046)、白细胞(p= 0.001)、PaO2/FiO2 (p=0.016)、分泌物(p= 0.001)、培养阳性(p= 0.001)以及总CPIS (p=0.030)值之间的显著变化。然而,CRP和PCT水平无显著差异。我们无法显示CPIS结构域、总CPIS、CRP、PCT、HAP病程和死亡率之间的任何关系。结论:CPIS监测HAP治疗效果优于CRP和PCT,但对死亡率无影响。为了获得更准确的评价,需要更多患者的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信