Valuation in emerging technoscience business: a case study of Finnish biobank research

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ilpo Helén, Hanna Lehtimäki
{"title":"Valuation in emerging technoscience business: a case study of Finnish biobank research","authors":"Ilpo Helén, Hanna Lehtimäki","doi":"10.1108/ejim-02-2023-0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The paper contributes to the discussion on valuation in organization studies and strategic management literature. The nascent literature on valuation practices has examined established markets where producers and consumers are known and rivalry in the market is a given. Furthermore, previous research has operated with a narrow meaning of value as either a financial profit or a subjective consumer preference. Such a narrow view on value is problematic and insufficient for studying the interlacing of innovation and value creation in emerging technoscientific business domains. Design/methodology/approach The authors present an empirical study about value creation in an emerging technoscience business domain formed around personalized medicine and digital health data. Findings The results of this analysis show that in a technoscientific domain, valuation of innovations is multiple and malleable, entails pursuing attractiveness in collaboration and partnerships and is performative, and due to emphatic future orientation, values are indefinite and promissory. Research limitations/implications As research implications, this study shows that valuation practices in an emerging technoscience business domain focus on defining the potential economic value in the future and attracting partners as probable future beneficiaries. Commercial value upon innovation in an embryonic business milieu is created and situated in valuation practices that constitute the prospective market, the prevalent economic discourse, and rationale. This is in contrast to an established market, where valuation practices are determined at the intersection of customer preferences and competitive arenas where suppliers, producers, service providers and new entrants to the market present value propositions. Practical implications The study findings extend discussion on valuation from established business domains to emerging technoscience business domains which are in a “pre-competition” phase where suppliers, customers, producers and their collaborative and competitive relations are not yet established. Social implications As managerial implications, this study provides insights into health innovation stakeholders, including stakeholders in the public, private and academic sectors, about the ecosystem dynamics in a technoscientific innovation. Such insight is useful in strategic decision-making about ecosystem strategy and ecosystem business model for value proposition, value creation and value capture in an emerging innovation domain characterized by collaborative and competitive relations among stakeholders. To business managers, the findings of this study about valuation practices are useful in strategic decision-making about ecosystem strategy and ecosystem business model for value proposition, value creation and value capture in an emerging innovation domain characterized by collaborative and competitive relations among stakeholders. To policy makers, this study provides an in-depth analysis of an overall business ecosystem in an emerging technoscience business that can be propelled to increase the financial investments in the field. As a policy implication, this study provides insights into the various dimensions of valuation in technoscience business to policy makers, who make governance decisions to guide and control the development of medical innovation using digital health data. Originality/value This study's results expand previous theorizing on valuation by showing that in technoscientific innovation all types of value created – scientific, clinical, social or economic – are predominantly promissory. This study complements the nascent theorizing on value creation and valuation practices of technoscientific innovation.","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-02-2023-0147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The paper contributes to the discussion on valuation in organization studies and strategic management literature. The nascent literature on valuation practices has examined established markets where producers and consumers are known and rivalry in the market is a given. Furthermore, previous research has operated with a narrow meaning of value as either a financial profit or a subjective consumer preference. Such a narrow view on value is problematic and insufficient for studying the interlacing of innovation and value creation in emerging technoscientific business domains. Design/methodology/approach The authors present an empirical study about value creation in an emerging technoscience business domain formed around personalized medicine and digital health data. Findings The results of this analysis show that in a technoscientific domain, valuation of innovations is multiple and malleable, entails pursuing attractiveness in collaboration and partnerships and is performative, and due to emphatic future orientation, values are indefinite and promissory. Research limitations/implications As research implications, this study shows that valuation practices in an emerging technoscience business domain focus on defining the potential economic value in the future and attracting partners as probable future beneficiaries. Commercial value upon innovation in an embryonic business milieu is created and situated in valuation practices that constitute the prospective market, the prevalent economic discourse, and rationale. This is in contrast to an established market, where valuation practices are determined at the intersection of customer preferences and competitive arenas where suppliers, producers, service providers and new entrants to the market present value propositions. Practical implications The study findings extend discussion on valuation from established business domains to emerging technoscience business domains which are in a “pre-competition” phase where suppliers, customers, producers and their collaborative and competitive relations are not yet established. Social implications As managerial implications, this study provides insights into health innovation stakeholders, including stakeholders in the public, private and academic sectors, about the ecosystem dynamics in a technoscientific innovation. Such insight is useful in strategic decision-making about ecosystem strategy and ecosystem business model for value proposition, value creation and value capture in an emerging innovation domain characterized by collaborative and competitive relations among stakeholders. To business managers, the findings of this study about valuation practices are useful in strategic decision-making about ecosystem strategy and ecosystem business model for value proposition, value creation and value capture in an emerging innovation domain characterized by collaborative and competitive relations among stakeholders. To policy makers, this study provides an in-depth analysis of an overall business ecosystem in an emerging technoscience business that can be propelled to increase the financial investments in the field. As a policy implication, this study provides insights into the various dimensions of valuation in technoscience business to policy makers, who make governance decisions to guide and control the development of medical innovation using digital health data. Originality/value This study's results expand previous theorizing on valuation by showing that in technoscientific innovation all types of value created – scientific, clinical, social or economic – are predominantly promissory. This study complements the nascent theorizing on value creation and valuation practices of technoscientific innovation.
新兴科技企业的估值:芬兰生物银行研究的案例研究
目的探讨组织研究和战略管理文献中的价值评估问题。关于估值实践的新兴文献研究了已知生产者和消费者的既定市场,市场上的竞争是既定的。此外,以往的研究将价值定义为一种狭隘的经济利益或主观的消费者偏好。这种狭隘的价值观对于研究新兴科技商业领域中创新与价值创造的相互作用是有问题的,也是不够的。设计/方法/方法作者对围绕个性化医疗和数字健康数据形成的新兴科技商业领域的价值创造进行了实证研究。本分析的结果表明,在技术科学领域,创新的估值是多重的和可塑的,需要在合作和伙伴关系中追求吸引力,并且是可执行的,并且由于强调未来导向,价值是不确定的和有希望的。作为研究意义,本研究表明,新兴科技商业领域的估值实践侧重于定义未来的潜在经济价值,并吸引合作伙伴作为未来可能的受益者。在商业环境的萌芽阶段,创新的商业价值被创造出来,并位于构成未来市场、流行经济话语和基本原理的估值实践中。这与既定市场形成对比,在既定市场中,估值做法是在客户偏好和供应商、生产商、服务提供商和市场新进入者提出价值主张的竞争领域的交叉点确定的。研究结果将对估值的讨论从已建立的业务领域扩展到新兴的技术科学业务领域,这些领域处于“竞争前”阶段,供应商、客户、生产商及其合作和竞争关系尚未建立。作为管理意义,本研究提供了对卫生创新利益相关者的见解,包括公共、私营和学术部门的利益相关者,关于技术科学创新中的生态系统动态。这种见解有助于在新兴的创新领域中做出关于生态系统战略和生态系统商业模式的战略决策,以实现利益相关者之间的合作和竞争关系为特征的价值主张、价值创造和价值获取。对于企业管理者而言,本研究关于估值实践的研究结果对于新兴创新领域中价值主张、价值创造和价值获取的生态系统战略和生态系统商业模式的战略决策是有用的,这些创新领域以利益相关者之间的合作和竞争关系为特征。对于政策制定者来说,这项研究提供了对新兴科技企业整体商业生态系统的深入分析,可以推动增加该领域的金融投资。本研究为政策制定者提供了科技企业估值的各个维度的见解,以指导和控制使用数字健康数据的医疗创新发展的治理决策。原创性/价值本研究的结果扩展了先前的估值理论,表明在技术科学创新中,所有类型的价值创造——科学的、临床的、社会的或经济的——主要是期许性的。本研究补充了新兴的科技创新价值创造理论和评估实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
17.60%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信