Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Doses of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy After Breast-conserving Surgery for Early-stage Breast Cancer

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Juan Deng, Chuou Yin, Hao Cheng, Gaoyuan Liu
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Doses of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy After Breast-conserving Surgery for Early-stage Breast Cancer","authors":"Juan Deng, Chuou Yin, Hao Cheng, Gaoyuan Liu","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v4i3.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — To investigate the efficacy of different doses of intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with early breast cancer after breast conserving surgery in order to provide more accurate treatment guidelines for clinical practice to further improve treatment outcomes and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Methods — The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different radiotherapy regimens after breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer. The study included 96 patients with early-stage breast cancer who were treated in our oncology department between January 2020 and May 2021. Patients were self-divided into group A and Group B by double-blind method, with 48 patients in each group. Group A received radiation therapy of 50Gy/25Fx for the whole breast after surgery, and an additional dose of 60Gy/25Fx was added to irradiate the tumor bed. Group B received whole breast radiation therapy of 50Gy/25Fx and tumor bed push of 10Gy/5Fx at the same time. The study will compare the differences between the two groups in treatment outcomes, three-year survival, and various adverse events that occur within six months of radiotherapy. Results — When comparing the two groups with different doses of IMRT, the authors focused on the difference in the percentage of the combined volume of prescription dose exposure above the percentage measurement line and the target dose uniformity index. The results showed very significant statistical differences between the two groups for both measures. In addition, it is worth noting that the probability of adverse reactions in group B patients exceeded that in group A, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion — For patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer, receiving radiation therapy with a total dose of 60Gy can significantly improve treatment outcomes. Compared with other dosing regimens, the use of 60Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse reactions while achieving the same therapeutic effect.","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"EM-11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v4i3.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective — To investigate the efficacy of different doses of intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with early breast cancer after breast conserving surgery in order to provide more accurate treatment guidelines for clinical practice to further improve treatment outcomes and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Methods — The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different radiotherapy regimens after breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer. The study included 96 patients with early-stage breast cancer who were treated in our oncology department between January 2020 and May 2021. Patients were self-divided into group A and Group B by double-blind method, with 48 patients in each group. Group A received radiation therapy of 50Gy/25Fx for the whole breast after surgery, and an additional dose of 60Gy/25Fx was added to irradiate the tumor bed. Group B received whole breast radiation therapy of 50Gy/25Fx and tumor bed push of 10Gy/5Fx at the same time. The study will compare the differences between the two groups in treatment outcomes, three-year survival, and various adverse events that occur within six months of radiotherapy. Results — When comparing the two groups with different doses of IMRT, the authors focused on the difference in the percentage of the combined volume of prescription dose exposure above the percentage measurement line and the target dose uniformity index. The results showed very significant statistical differences between the two groups for both measures. In addition, it is worth noting that the probability of adverse reactions in group B patients exceeded that in group A, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion — For patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for early stage breast cancer, receiving radiation therapy with a total dose of 60Gy can significantly improve treatment outcomes. Compared with other dosing regimens, the use of 60Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse reactions while achieving the same therapeutic effect.
早期乳腺癌保乳术后不同剂量调强放疗的疗效比较
目的-探讨不同剂量调强放疗对早期乳腺癌保乳术后患者的疗效,为临床实践提供更准确的治疗指导,进一步提高乳腺癌患者的治疗效果和生活质量。方法:本研究的主要目的是评估早期乳腺癌保乳手术后不同放疗方案的效果。该研究包括96名早期乳腺癌患者,他们在2020年1月至2021年5月期间在我们的肿瘤科接受治疗。采用双盲法将患者自行分为A组和B组,每组48例。A组患者术后全乳放疗剂量为50Gy/25Fx,瘤床放疗剂量为60Gy/25Fx。B组患者同时接受50Gy/25Fx全乳放疗和10Gy/5Fx肿瘤床推;该研究将比较两组在治疗结果、三年生存率和放疗后六个月内发生的各种不良事件方面的差异。结果-在比较两组不同剂量的IMRT时,作者关注的是处方剂量暴露在百分比测量线以上的综合体积百分比和目标剂量均匀性指数的差异。结果显示两组在两种测量方法上有非常显著的统计学差异。另外,值得注意的是,B组患者出现不良反应的概率高于A组,差异有统计学意义。结论-对于早期乳腺癌保乳手术患者,接受总剂量为60Gy的放疗可显著改善治疗效果。与其他给药方案相比,60Gy调强放疗在达到相同治疗效果的同时,可显著降低不良反应的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信