Asymmetric trade uncertainty-environmental quality nexus: evidence from quantile estimation

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Zeyi Yu, Raima Nazar, Sajid Ali
{"title":"Asymmetric trade uncertainty-environmental quality nexus: evidence from quantile estimation","authors":"Zeyi Yu, Raima Nazar, Sajid Ali","doi":"10.1080/09638199.2023.2271571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractTrade uncertainty leads to fluctuations in global trade dynamics and their potential impacts on environmental conditions, prompting concerns about how trade policies and practices may influence environmental sustainability and pollution levels. The present investigation desires to probe the correlation between trade uncertainty and environmental quality in the top 10 economies known for high levels of trade uncertainty (the USA, China, the UK, Japan, South Korea, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and Australia). Previous studies have consistently explored this relationship using panel data analysis, which uncovered distinct and separate correlations in specific countries. The existing work applies a distinctive tool, ‘Quantile-on-Quantile’, to analyze the interdependence of time series data within all nations. The outcomes of this research disclose that trade uncertainty predominantly has a positive impact on environmental quality in most nations, particularly within particular segments of the distribution of data. Furthermore, this research highlights the diverse levels of asymmetries in the correlation between these variables across distinct countries. In addition, the outcomes demonstrate that the extent of asymmetry between the variables varies from one economy to another, underscoring the importance for policymakers to exercise careful emphasis when executing trade-related uncertainty and environmental sustainability policies.KEYWORDS: Trade uncertaintyCO2 emissionsquantile estimationJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: F18F1F Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":51656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","volume":"374 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2271571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractTrade uncertainty leads to fluctuations in global trade dynamics and their potential impacts on environmental conditions, prompting concerns about how trade policies and practices may influence environmental sustainability and pollution levels. The present investigation desires to probe the correlation between trade uncertainty and environmental quality in the top 10 economies known for high levels of trade uncertainty (the USA, China, the UK, Japan, South Korea, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and Australia). Previous studies have consistently explored this relationship using panel data analysis, which uncovered distinct and separate correlations in specific countries. The existing work applies a distinctive tool, ‘Quantile-on-Quantile’, to analyze the interdependence of time series data within all nations. The outcomes of this research disclose that trade uncertainty predominantly has a positive impact on environmental quality in most nations, particularly within particular segments of the distribution of data. Furthermore, this research highlights the diverse levels of asymmetries in the correlation between these variables across distinct countries. In addition, the outcomes demonstrate that the extent of asymmetry between the variables varies from one economy to another, underscoring the importance for policymakers to exercise careful emphasis when executing trade-related uncertainty and environmental sustainability policies.KEYWORDS: Trade uncertaintyCO2 emissionsquantile estimationJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: F18F1F Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
不对称贸易不确定性-环境质量关系:来自分位数估计的证据
摘要贸易的不确定性导致全球贸易动态的波动及其对环境条件的潜在影响,促使人们关注贸易政策和做法如何影响环境可持续性和污染水平。本研究旨在探讨以高贸易不确定性著称的十大经济体(美国、中国、英国、日本、韩国、意大利、德国、法国、西班牙和澳大利亚)的贸易不确定性与环境质量之间的相关性。以前的研究一直使用面板数据分析来探索这种关系,发现了特定国家之间独特而独立的相关性。现有的工作采用了一种独特的工具,“分位数对分位数”,来分析所有国家时间序列数据的相互依赖性。本研究的结果表明,在大多数国家,贸易不确定性对环境质量具有主要的积极影响,特别是在数据分布的特定部分。此外,这项研究强调了不同国家这些变量之间相关性的不同程度的不对称。此外,结果表明,变量之间的不对称程度因经济体而异,这强调了政策制定者在执行与贸易相关的不确定性和环境可持续性政策时谨慎强调的重要性。关键词:贸易不确定性;二氧化碳排放分值估算;jel分类:F18F1F披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development ( JITED) focuses on international economics, economic development, and the interface between trade and development. The links between trade and development economics are critical at a time when fluctuating commodity prices, ongoing production fragmentation, and trade liberalisation can radically affect the economies of advanced and developing countries. Our aim is to keep in touch with the latest developments in research as well as setting the agenda for future analysis. Publication of high quality articles covering; theoretical and applied issues in international and development economics; econometric applications of trade and/or development issues based on sound theoretical economic models or testing fundamental economic hypotheses; models of structural change; trade and development issues of economies in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Pacific area; papers on specific topics which are policy-relevant; review articles on important branches of the literature including controversial and innovative ideas are also welcome. JITED is designed to meet the needs of international and development economists, economic historians, applied economists, and policy makers. The international experts who make up the journal’s Editorial Board encourage contributions from economists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信