Differences in eye movements in chest X-ray diagnosis and exploration of effective diagnostic strategies: A study in annual medical checkup conditions

Yijia Wang, Hirotaka Aoki, Koji Morishita, Marie Takahashi, Rea Machida, Atsushi Kudoh, Mitsuhiro Kishino, Tsuyoshi Shirai
{"title":"Differences in eye movements in chest X-ray diagnosis and exploration of effective diagnostic strategies: A study in annual medical checkup conditions","authors":"Yijia Wang, Hirotaka Aoki, Koji Morishita, Marie Takahashi, Rea Machida, Atsushi Kudoh, Mitsuhiro Kishino, Tsuyoshi Shirai","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the process of medical interpretation and diagnosis in medical image, doctors’ attention allocations are various depending on individuals and cases. The process of diagnosing in the medical image involves complex interplay between visual perception and effective information acquisition strategies coupled with medical knowledge. It is difficult for doctors to explicitly explain their strategies because the process is often implicit. To date, precisely what attention allocation patterns and cognitive strategies in medical image reading, remains unknown.This study aims to uncover the doctor’s attention allocation and transition patterns in reading chest X-ray image, elicit diagnostic strategies based on doctor’s eye movements and interviews, and find the differences of diagnostic strategies between expert and novice doctors. Finally, prospective suggestions for leading novice doctors to an effective diagnostic strategy in reading X-ray image can be presented.We simulate the scenario of annual medical checkup using four patients’ cases, and recruit participants with diverse medical experiences and specialties in Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital to compare the differences of attention allocations between doctors. Doctors are asked to identify the lesion and give diagnostic decision to four cases. Their eye movements are recorded in the whole process by eye tracker. After completing all four cases, participants are asked to attend an interview session in which their eye movements are used as cues to elicit their diagnostic strategies. And two questionnaires are answered at last. Fixation duration, the number of fixations in each are of interest (AOI) are used to visualize doctors’ attention allocation and fixation transition patterns. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis are used to describe doctors’ diagnostic strategies and compare the differences between expert and novice doctors. Each doctor has personal characteristics when diagnosing. Doctors have a significant preference to read to current image. Doctors tend to pay more attention to areas where physiological structures overlap and where doctors think suspicious. As for diagnostic strategies, four typical patterns of change of diagnostic strategies in timeline are found. Furthermore, the differences are found between expert and novice doctors in attention allocation and the use of historical image.The effective diagnostic strategy is that performing the inspection routine of the current image separate with comparison with the historical image to avoid distracting and missing information. The comparison should focus on important areas and suspicious areas rather than the whole image. The suggested important areas are the lung apex, mediastinum, heart, left lung hilar and the lower lung field. The proposed effective strategies could be included in the medical education and new doctor training to improve novice doctors’ ability to diagnose by multiple images.","PeriodicalId":470195,"journal":{"name":"AHFE international","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the process of medical interpretation and diagnosis in medical image, doctors’ attention allocations are various depending on individuals and cases. The process of diagnosing in the medical image involves complex interplay between visual perception and effective information acquisition strategies coupled with medical knowledge. It is difficult for doctors to explicitly explain their strategies because the process is often implicit. To date, precisely what attention allocation patterns and cognitive strategies in medical image reading, remains unknown.This study aims to uncover the doctor’s attention allocation and transition patterns in reading chest X-ray image, elicit diagnostic strategies based on doctor’s eye movements and interviews, and find the differences of diagnostic strategies between expert and novice doctors. Finally, prospective suggestions for leading novice doctors to an effective diagnostic strategy in reading X-ray image can be presented.We simulate the scenario of annual medical checkup using four patients’ cases, and recruit participants with diverse medical experiences and specialties in Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital to compare the differences of attention allocations between doctors. Doctors are asked to identify the lesion and give diagnostic decision to four cases. Their eye movements are recorded in the whole process by eye tracker. After completing all four cases, participants are asked to attend an interview session in which their eye movements are used as cues to elicit their diagnostic strategies. And two questionnaires are answered at last. Fixation duration, the number of fixations in each are of interest (AOI) are used to visualize doctors’ attention allocation and fixation transition patterns. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis are used to describe doctors’ diagnostic strategies and compare the differences between expert and novice doctors. Each doctor has personal characteristics when diagnosing. Doctors have a significant preference to read to current image. Doctors tend to pay more attention to areas where physiological structures overlap and where doctors think suspicious. As for diagnostic strategies, four typical patterns of change of diagnostic strategies in timeline are found. Furthermore, the differences are found between expert and novice doctors in attention allocation and the use of historical image.The effective diagnostic strategy is that performing the inspection routine of the current image separate with comparison with the historical image to avoid distracting and missing information. The comparison should focus on important areas and suspicious areas rather than the whole image. The suggested important areas are the lung apex, mediastinum, heart, left lung hilar and the lower lung field. The proposed effective strategies could be included in the medical education and new doctor training to improve novice doctors’ ability to diagnose by multiple images.
眼动在胸部x线诊断中的差异及有效诊断策略的探索——基于年度体检条件的研究
在医学图像的医学解读和诊断过程中,医生的注意力分配因个体和病例而异。医学图像的诊断过程涉及视觉感知与有效的信息获取策略以及医学知识之间复杂的相互作用。医生很难明确地解释他们的策略,因为这个过程往往是隐性的。迄今为止,医学图像阅读的注意力分配模式和认知策略究竟是什么,仍然是未知的。本研究旨在揭示医生在阅读胸部x线影像时的注意力分配和转移模式,基于医生的眼动和访谈得出诊断策略,并发现专家和新手医生在诊断策略上的差异。最后,提出前瞻性建议,指导新手医生在阅读x线影像时制定有效的诊断策略。我们以4例患者为例,模拟年度体检的情景,并在东京医科和牙科大学医院招募具有不同医疗经验和专业的参与者,比较医生之间注意力分配的差异。医生被要求确定病变并对四个病例作出诊断决定。他们的眼球运动在整个过程中被眼动仪记录下来。在完成所有四个案例后,参与者被要求参加一个访谈环节,在这个环节中,他们的眼球运动被作为线索来引出他们的诊断策略。最后回答了两份问卷。注视持续时间、每个感兴趣的注视数(AOI)用于可视化医生的注意分配和注视转移模式。定性分析和定量分析相结合,描述了医生的诊断策略,比较了专家医生和新手医生之间的差异。每个医生在诊断时都有自己的特点。医生明显倾向于阅读当前图像。医生往往更关注生理结构重叠的区域和医生认为可疑的区域。在诊断策略方面,发现了诊断策略在时间轴上的四种典型变化模式。此外,专家和新手医生在注意力分配和历史图像的使用上存在差异。有效的诊断策略是将当前图像的检查程序与历史图像的比较分开执行,以避免分散注意力和丢失信息。对比应该集中在重要区域和可疑区域,而不是整个图像。建议的重要区域是肺尖、纵隔、心脏、左肺门和下肺野。提出的有效策略可纳入医学教育和新医生培训中,以提高新医生的多图像诊断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信