«Калмыки ныне с Крымом в твердом миру…». Калмыцко-крымские отношения в конце XVII в.

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Vladimir T. Tepkeev
{"title":"«Калмыки ныне с Крымом в твердом миру…». Калмыцко-крымские отношения в конце XVII в.","authors":"Vladimir T. Tepkeev","doi":"10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-178-191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article deals with a little-known — though noticeable — episode in the history of late seventeenth-century Kalmyk-Crimean relations. The period remains somewhat understudied, and there are still unpublished sources on the topic. Goals. The paper aims to introduce some newly discovered archival materials discussing a most interesting period in the history of relations between the Crimean and Kalmyk Khanates characterized by a short-lived close political interaction. Materials. The work examines materials stored at the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, the former largely contained in collections nos. 111 (‘Don Affairs’), 119 (‘Kalmyk Affairs’), and 123 (‘Crimean Affairs’). Results. The conducted insights into archival sources have yielded some new data pertaining to mutual ambassadorial contacts between the two khanates that essentially clarify and extend the existing historical knowledge of the then Kalmyk-Crimean relations. Conclusions. The mutual political approach between Kalmyks and the Crimean Khanate in the 1680s–1690s proved short-lived, and had primarily been ignited by a dramatic deterioration in Russian-Kalmyk relations. That was a significant success of the Crimean diplomacy that took every advantage of the then dissentions between Kalmyks and the Tsardom of Russia. The mentioned political consent was paralleled by mutually beneficial horse and cattle trading activities. However, the frequent power shifts in the Crimea never facilitated any long-term interaction, the latter having been aggravated by another worsening in the ‘Nogai question’ when in 1696 Nogai subjects of Kalmyks fled to Kuban requesting the Crimean Khan’s protection. It was then that the confrontation between Kalmyk chieftains and Crimean officials — that finally led to an armed clash — arouse.","PeriodicalId":33928,"journal":{"name":"Mongolovedenie","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mongolovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-178-191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article deals with a little-known — though noticeable — episode in the history of late seventeenth-century Kalmyk-Crimean relations. The period remains somewhat understudied, and there are still unpublished sources on the topic. Goals. The paper aims to introduce some newly discovered archival materials discussing a most interesting period in the history of relations between the Crimean and Kalmyk Khanates characterized by a short-lived close political interaction. Materials. The work examines materials stored at the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts, the former largely contained in collections nos. 111 (‘Don Affairs’), 119 (‘Kalmyk Affairs’), and 123 (‘Crimean Affairs’). Results. The conducted insights into archival sources have yielded some new data pertaining to mutual ambassadorial contacts between the two khanates that essentially clarify and extend the existing historical knowledge of the then Kalmyk-Crimean relations. Conclusions. The mutual political approach between Kalmyks and the Crimean Khanate in the 1680s–1690s proved short-lived, and had primarily been ignited by a dramatic deterioration in Russian-Kalmyk relations. That was a significant success of the Crimean diplomacy that took every advantage of the then dissentions between Kalmyks and the Tsardom of Russia. The mentioned political consent was paralleled by mutually beneficial horse and cattle trading activities. However, the frequent power shifts in the Crimea never facilitated any long-term interaction, the latter having been aggravated by another worsening in the ‘Nogai question’ when in 1696 Nogai subjects of Kalmyks fled to Kuban requesting the Crimean Khan’s protection. It was then that the confrontation between Kalmyk chieftains and Crimean officials — that finally led to an armed clash — arouse.
"卡尔梅克人现在与克里米亚和平相处......"。17 世纪末卡尔梅克与克里米亚的关系。
介绍。这篇文章讲述了17世纪晚期卡尔梅克-克里米亚关系史上一个鲜为人知却引人注目的插曲。这一时期的研究还不够充分,关于这一主题仍有未发表的资料。的目标。本文旨在介绍一些新发现的档案材料,讨论克里米亚和卡尔梅克汗国关系历史上最有趣的时期,其特征是短暂的密切政治互动。材料。这项工作检查了存放在俄罗斯国家古代行为档案馆的材料,前者主要包含在第111号(“顿河事务”),第119号(“卡尔梅克事务”)和第123号(“克里米亚事务”)中。结果。通过对档案资料的深入研究,得出了一些关于两个汗国之间相互大使接触的新数据,这些数据从根本上澄清和扩展了当时卡尔梅克-克里米亚关系的现有历史知识。结论。17世纪80年代至90年代,卡尔梅克人和克里米亚汗国之间的相互政治关系被证明是短暂的,主要是由俄罗斯与卡尔梅克关系的急剧恶化引发的。这是克里米亚外交的一个重大成功,它充分利用了当时卡尔梅克人和俄罗斯沙皇之间的分歧。上述政治上的同意与互利的马和牛交易活动并行。然而,克里米亚频繁的权力转移从未促成任何长期的互动,后者因1696年卡尔梅克诺盖人逃到库班请求克里米亚可汗的保护而再次恶化的“诺盖问题”而加剧。就在那时,卡尔梅克酋长和克里米亚官员之间的对抗——最终导致了一场武装冲突——爆发了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mongolovedenie
Mongolovedenie Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信