Legal Certainty on Land Ownership Rights Above Management Rights

Alwaahab Agirda Nugraha Effendi, Akhmad Darajati Setiawan
{"title":"Legal Certainty on Land Ownership Rights Above Management Rights","authors":"Alwaahab Agirda Nugraha Effendi, Akhmad Darajati Setiawan","doi":"10.15294/ipmhi.v3i2.67824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of legal product shows its influence with the occurrence of a tug-of-war pattern between responsive legal products and conservative legal products. The formal legal policy of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (UUCK) starts from the government's political will, which is expected to be able to break the chain of bureaucracy and harmonize government policies to support the investment climate. One of the efforts is a change in legal products in agrarian affairs related to Hak Milik and Hak Pengelolaan. Hak Milik can be issued on Hak Pengelolaan land, but the nature of Hak Milik as the strongest and most complete right over the land will experience ambiguity if issued on Hak Pengelolaan land as a state-controlled right that does not result in the cancellation or release of Hak Milik. This results in a lack of legal certainty regarding the position of Hak Milik. This study examines how Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Condominium Units, and Land Registration as a derivative of UUCK provides legal certainty for Hak Milik standing on Hak Pengeloaan. The results of the study show that Hak Milik, Hak Guna Bangunan and Hak Pakai issued on Hak Pengelolaan do not result in the cancellation of the legal relationship with the holder of Hak Pengelolaan. Hak Pengelolaan can be released through a mechanism of releasing rights, the process of which is reported to the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial and then released as state land for subsequent application for the issuance of Hak Milik to eligible right applicants and Hak Pengelolaan will automatically be cancelled if Hak Milik have been issued on Hak Pengelolaan based on a letter of approval from the holder of Hak Pengelolaan","PeriodicalId":495918,"journal":{"name":"Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v3i2.67824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of legal product shows its influence with the occurrence of a tug-of-war pattern between responsive legal products and conservative legal products. The formal legal policy of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (UUCK) starts from the government's political will, which is expected to be able to break the chain of bureaucracy and harmonize government policies to support the investment climate. One of the efforts is a change in legal products in agrarian affairs related to Hak Milik and Hak Pengelolaan. Hak Milik can be issued on Hak Pengelolaan land, but the nature of Hak Milik as the strongest and most complete right over the land will experience ambiguity if issued on Hak Pengelolaan land as a state-controlled right that does not result in the cancellation or release of Hak Milik. This results in a lack of legal certainty regarding the position of Hak Milik. This study examines how Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Condominium Units, and Land Registration as a derivative of UUCK provides legal certainty for Hak Milik standing on Hak Pengeloaan. The results of the study show that Hak Milik, Hak Guna Bangunan and Hak Pakai issued on Hak Pengelolaan do not result in the cancellation of the legal relationship with the holder of Hak Pengelolaan. Hak Pengelolaan can be released through a mechanism of releasing rights, the process of which is reported to the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial and then released as state land for subsequent application for the issuance of Hak Milik to eligible right applicants and Hak Pengelolaan will automatically be cancelled if Hak Milik have been issued on Hak Pengelolaan based on a letter of approval from the holder of Hak Pengelolaan
土地所有权高于经营权的法律确定性
在法律产品的发展过程中,反应型法律产品与保守型法律产品之间出现了拔河的格局。关于创造就业的2020年第11号法律(UUCK)的正式法律政策从政府的政治意愿开始,预计能够打破官僚主义链,协调政府政策以支持投资环境。其中一项努力是改变与Hak Milik和Hak Pengelolaan有关的土地事务的法律产品。Hak milk可以在Hak Pengelolaan土地上发行,但如果Hak milk作为国家控制的权利在Hak Pengelolaan土地上发行,而不导致Hak milk的取消或释放,那么Hak milk作为土地上最强大和最完整的权利的性质将会变得模糊。这导致Hak Milik的立场缺乏法律确定性。本研究探讨2021年第18号政府规例,有关Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah,共管公寓单位和土地注册作为UUCK的衍生品,如何为Hak Milik站在Hak pengelaan提供法律确定性。研究结果显示,Hak Milik、Hak Guna Bangunan和Hak Pakai在Hak Pengelolaan上所签发的,并不会导致与Hak Pengelolaan持有人的法律关系被取消。可透过释权机制释出海坪屿,释权过程须向农业及空间部报告,然后释出为国有土地,供符合资格的申请人申请释出海坪屿。如果海坪屿已根据海坪屿持有人的批准函,在海坪屿屿上释出海坪屿,海坪屿将自动取消
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信