The need of change in complex workplaces of the O&G industry – from controlling human error to understanding the resilience of systems

Josue Franca
{"title":"The need of change in complex workplaces of the O&G industry – from controlling human error to understanding the resilience of systems","authors":"Josue Franca","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the first oil drilling in History, the Drake’s well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, until the present-day offshore wells, drilled in the ultra-deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Brazilian Pre-Salt, two aspects have always been present: the notable risks of dealing with crude oil and the need of human adaptabilities in the work systems. From this adaptability, there will be two possible outcomes: the normal work, adaptive and productive, and the accident, unwanted and harmful. For the first, over a long time no attention was given, because if nothing went wrong, (supposedly) there is nothing to do, except to continue working. On the other hand, for this second, the accident, since the first occurrences, dating from the 1st Industrial Revolution, much has been developed, addressed, mainly, on the unwanted action of the human element in a linear system. However, the technological evolution of work systems has transformed linear production lines into current complex sociotechnical systems, where there are intense and dynamic interrelationships between people, machines, and processes, immersed in a distinct organizational culture. In this context, the maintenance of certain linear epistemological concepts for the analysis of risks, as well as the investigation of accidents, seems to be limited, when not mistaken, for understanding and intervening in nowadays complex workplaces. In addition, normal work, that is, work carried out without the occurrence of accidents, as it is what mostly happens, is a notable source of learning, being neglected precisely because it is normal. In view of these considerations, methodologies, and concepts capable of dealing with this, such as FRAM (Functional Resonance Analysis Method) and Safety-I & Safety-II, arises as adequate solutions. In this study, having the O&G Industry as background, some accidents with FRAM are re-examined, as well as some practices of learning from normal work through Safety-I & Safety-II, demonstrating the need of change in complex workplaces of the O&G industry, evolving from controlling human error to understanding the resilience of systems.","PeriodicalId":470195,"journal":{"name":"AHFE international","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the first oil drilling in History, the Drake’s well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, until the present-day offshore wells, drilled in the ultra-deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Brazilian Pre-Salt, two aspects have always been present: the notable risks of dealing with crude oil and the need of human adaptabilities in the work systems. From this adaptability, there will be two possible outcomes: the normal work, adaptive and productive, and the accident, unwanted and harmful. For the first, over a long time no attention was given, because if nothing went wrong, (supposedly) there is nothing to do, except to continue working. On the other hand, for this second, the accident, since the first occurrences, dating from the 1st Industrial Revolution, much has been developed, addressed, mainly, on the unwanted action of the human element in a linear system. However, the technological evolution of work systems has transformed linear production lines into current complex sociotechnical systems, where there are intense and dynamic interrelationships between people, machines, and processes, immersed in a distinct organizational culture. In this context, the maintenance of certain linear epistemological concepts for the analysis of risks, as well as the investigation of accidents, seems to be limited, when not mistaken, for understanding and intervening in nowadays complex workplaces. In addition, normal work, that is, work carried out without the occurrence of accidents, as it is what mostly happens, is a notable source of learning, being neglected precisely because it is normal. In view of these considerations, methodologies, and concepts capable of dealing with this, such as FRAM (Functional Resonance Analysis Method) and Safety-I & Safety-II, arises as adequate solutions. In this study, having the O&G Industry as background, some accidents with FRAM are re-examined, as well as some practices of learning from normal work through Safety-I & Safety-II, demonstrating the need of change in complex workplaces of the O&G industry, evolving from controlling human error to understanding the resilience of systems.
石油和天然气行业复杂工作场所的变革需求——从控制人为错误到理解系统的弹性
自历史上第一次石油钻探以来,即宾夕法尼亚州泰特斯维尔的德雷克井,直到今天在墨西哥湾超深水和巴西盐下钻探的海上油井,一直存在两个方面:处理原油的显著风险和对工作系统中人类适应性的需求。从这种适应性来看,有两种可能的结果:正常工作,适应性强,富有成效;事故,不必要的,有害的。对于第一种情况,很长一段时间都没有引起人们的注意,因为如果没有什么问题,(据说)除了继续工作之外,没有什么可做的。另一方面,从第一次工业革命以来的第一次事故,已经发展了很多,主要是针对线性系统中人为因素的不必要行为。然而,工作系统的技术进化已经将线性生产线转变为当前复杂的社会技术系统,在那里,人、机器和过程之间存在着强烈而动态的相互关系,沉浸在独特的组织文化中。在这种情况下,维护某些线性认识论概念的风险分析,以及事故的调查,似乎是有限的,如果没有错误,在当今复杂的工作场所的理解和干预。此外,正常的工作,即在没有发生事故的情况下进行的工作,因为这是经常发生的,是一个值得注意的学习来源,正是因为它是正常的而被忽视。考虑到这些因素,能够处理这种情况的方法和概念,例如FRAM(功能共振分析法)和Safety-I &安全ii,作为适当的解决方案出现。本研究以o&g行业为背景,对FRAM事故进行重新审视,并通过Safety-I &Safety-II,展示了油气行业复杂工作场所的变革需求,从控制人为错误发展到理解系统的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信