Comparison of Taiwanese and European Calibration Factors for Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio in Multicenter <sup>123</sup>I-mIBG Phantom Studies

Koichi Okuda, Kenichi Nakajima, Guang-Uei Hung, Hao-Ting Wu, Derk O. Verschure, Hein J. Verberne, Chiemi Kitamura
{"title":"Comparison of Taiwanese and European Calibration Factors for Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio in Multicenter &lt;sup&gt;123&lt;/sup&gt;I-mIBG Phantom Studies","authors":"Koichi Okuda, Kenichi Nakajima, Guang-Uei Hung, Hao-Ting Wu, Derk O. Verschure, Hein J. Verberne, Chiemi Kitamura","doi":"10.17996/anc.23-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cross-calibration of 123I-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) myocardial-derived indices is essential to extrapolate findings from several clinical centers. Here, we conducted a phantom study to generate conversion coefficients for the calibration of heart-to-mediastinum ratios and compare them between Taiwan and Europe. Methods: We used an acrylic phantom dedicated to 123I-mIBG planar imaging to calculate the conversion coefficients of 136 phantom images derived from 36 Taiwanese institutions. A European phantom image database including 191 images from 27 institutions was used. Conversion coefficients were categorized into five collimator types: low-energy (LE) high-resolution (LEHR), LE general-purpose (LEGP), extended LEGP (ELEGP), medium-energy (ME) GP (MEGP), and ME low-penetration (MELP) collimators. Results: The conversion coefficients were 0.53 ± 0.039, 0.59 ± 0.032, 0.79 ± 0.032, 0.96 ± 0.038, and 0.99 ± 0.050 for LEHR, LEGP, ELEGP, MEGP, and MELP collimators, respectively. The Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients for the LEHR, LEGP, and MELP collimators did not significantly differ. The coefficient of variation was slightly higher for the Taiwanese than the European conversion coefficients (3.7%–7.5% vs. 2.3%–5.6%). Conclusions: We calculated conversion coefficients for various types of collimators used in Taiwan using a 123I-mIBG phantom. In general, the Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients were comparable. These findings further corroborated and highlighted the need for 123I-mIBG standardization using the phantom-determined conversion coefficients.","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.23-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cross-calibration of 123I-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) myocardial-derived indices is essential to extrapolate findings from several clinical centers. Here, we conducted a phantom study to generate conversion coefficients for the calibration of heart-to-mediastinum ratios and compare them between Taiwan and Europe. Methods: We used an acrylic phantom dedicated to 123I-mIBG planar imaging to calculate the conversion coefficients of 136 phantom images derived from 36 Taiwanese institutions. A European phantom image database including 191 images from 27 institutions was used. Conversion coefficients were categorized into five collimator types: low-energy (LE) high-resolution (LEHR), LE general-purpose (LEGP), extended LEGP (ELEGP), medium-energy (ME) GP (MEGP), and ME low-penetration (MELP) collimators. Results: The conversion coefficients were 0.53 ± 0.039, 0.59 ± 0.032, 0.79 ± 0.032, 0.96 ± 0.038, and 0.99 ± 0.050 for LEHR, LEGP, ELEGP, MEGP, and MELP collimators, respectively. The Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients for the LEHR, LEGP, and MELP collimators did not significantly differ. The coefficient of variation was slightly higher for the Taiwanese than the European conversion coefficients (3.7%–7.5% vs. 2.3%–5.6%). Conclusions: We calculated conversion coefficients for various types of collimators used in Taiwan using a 123I-mIBG phantom. In general, the Taiwanese and European conversion coefficients were comparable. These findings further corroborated and highlighted the need for 123I-mIBG standardization using the phantom-determined conversion coefficients.
多中心sup>123</sup>I-mIBG幻像研究中台湾与欧洲心脏与纵隔比值校正因子的比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信