Parallel Interplay between Tradition and Folk Theatre: A Study of select works of Vijay Tendulkar

Md. Alemul Islam
{"title":"Parallel Interplay between Tradition and Folk Theatre: A Study of select works of Vijay Tendulkar","authors":"Md. Alemul Islam","doi":"10.22161/ijels.85.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Folk theatre is the root of modern Indian drama, and with the advancement of modernity, folk theatre keeps balancing the dynamic aspect of modernity. Most of India's well-known playwrights overcame the limitations of regional language throughout the 1970s and produced a number of excellent plays on a national scale. The majority of their experimental productions were focused on incorporating Indian folk theatre components or performance traditions into mainstream theatre. As a result, we see Utpal Dutt using Jatra in Surya Sikar and Girish Karnad adopting Yakshagna, a traditional type of theatre, in his play Hayavadana (1972). In order to create a new type of theatre that he called the \"Third Theatre\" or \"Street Theatre\", Badal Sircar experimented with incorporating folk elements into proscenium theatres. Similar to his contemporaries, Vijay Tendulkar also experimented with many types of folk drama in Ghasiram Kotwal (1972) and other plays. The current study is an integrated effort to concentrate on how tradition and modernity are portrayed in Vijay Tendulkar's plays. Another way to put it is that modernity has economic, social, cultural, and political ramifications. A cultural driving force with social, economic, and political ramifications is tradition. Vijay Tendulkar explores both conventional and contemporary tendencies in his plays through folk theatre. In his plays, he combines elements of heritage and modernism. They are entangled with both modernity and tradition. One may easily notice Tendulkar's keen observation of life in his plays . He strikes a delicate balance between tradition and contemporary in expressing the social realities . The purpose of this article is try to understand how Tendulkar employed various folk theatre styles to express power dynamics and the outcome of oppression, a very modern and postcolonial subject, on stage.","PeriodicalId":474639,"journal":{"name":"International journal of english, literature and social science","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of english, literature and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.85.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Folk theatre is the root of modern Indian drama, and with the advancement of modernity, folk theatre keeps balancing the dynamic aspect of modernity. Most of India's well-known playwrights overcame the limitations of regional language throughout the 1970s and produced a number of excellent plays on a national scale. The majority of their experimental productions were focused on incorporating Indian folk theatre components or performance traditions into mainstream theatre. As a result, we see Utpal Dutt using Jatra in Surya Sikar and Girish Karnad adopting Yakshagna, a traditional type of theatre, in his play Hayavadana (1972). In order to create a new type of theatre that he called the "Third Theatre" or "Street Theatre", Badal Sircar experimented with incorporating folk elements into proscenium theatres. Similar to his contemporaries, Vijay Tendulkar also experimented with many types of folk drama in Ghasiram Kotwal (1972) and other plays. The current study is an integrated effort to concentrate on how tradition and modernity are portrayed in Vijay Tendulkar's plays. Another way to put it is that modernity has economic, social, cultural, and political ramifications. A cultural driving force with social, economic, and political ramifications is tradition. Vijay Tendulkar explores both conventional and contemporary tendencies in his plays through folk theatre. In his plays, he combines elements of heritage and modernism. They are entangled with both modernity and tradition. One may easily notice Tendulkar's keen observation of life in his plays . He strikes a delicate balance between tradition and contemporary in expressing the social realities . The purpose of this article is try to understand how Tendulkar employed various folk theatre styles to express power dynamics and the outcome of oppression, a very modern and postcolonial subject, on stage.
传统与民间戏剧的平行互动:维贾伊·坦杜卡精选作品研究
民间戏剧是印度现代戏剧的根源,随着现代性的推进,民间戏剧不断平衡着现代性的动态方面。在整个20世纪70年代,大多数印度著名的剧作家都克服了地域语言的限制,在全国范围内创作了许多优秀的戏剧。他们的大多数实验作品集中于将印度民间戏剧成分或表演传统纳入主流戏剧。因此,我们看到Utpal Dutt在Surya Sikar中使用Jatra, Girish Karnad在他的戏剧Hayavadana(1972)中采用Yakshagna,一种传统的戏剧类型。为了创造一种他称之为“第三剧场”或“街头剧场”的新型剧场,Badal Sircar尝试将民间元素融入舞台剧场。与他同时代的人相似,Vijay Tendulkar也在Ghasiram Kotwal(1972)和其他戏剧中尝试了许多类型的民间戏剧。目前的研究是一个综合的努力,集中在传统和现代是如何在维贾伊·坦杜卡的戏剧中被描绘出来的。另一种说法是,现代性具有经济、社会、文化和政治方面的影响。具有社会、经济和政治影响的文化驱动力是传统。维贾伊·坦杜卡通过民间戏剧探索了他的戏剧中传统和当代的趋势。在他的戏剧中,他结合了传统和现代主义的元素。它们与现代和传统都纠缠在一起。人们很容易在他的戏剧中注意到坦杜卡对生活的敏锐观察。他在表达社会现实时,在传统与当代之间取得了微妙的平衡。本文的目的是试图理解Tendulkar如何运用各种民间戏剧风格来表达权力动态和压迫的结果,这是一个非常现代和后殖民的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信