Analysis of The Effect of Hull Vane Lifting Force on Fast Vessel Resistance: Straight Hull Vane

Nafiri Muhammad Kautsar, None I Ketut Suastika
{"title":"Analysis of The Effect of Hull Vane Lifting Force on Fast Vessel Resistance: Straight Hull Vane","authors":"Nafiri Muhammad Kautsar, None I Ketut Suastika","doi":"10.55981/wave.2023.926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In previous studies by Saputra, the use of straight Hull Vane® increased ship's resistance. Based on hypothesis, this was caused by lifting force from Hull Vane® being too large, so that ship experienced bow trim. To reduce bow trim, smaller Hull Vane® was made including Hull Vane® with AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9 and AR = 28.94 with speeds which were 11 knots (Fn = 0.34), 17 knots (Fn = 0.53), 20 knots (Fn = 0.62) and 26 knots (Fn = 0.8). From simulation results, it was found that use of a straight Hull Vane® in every aspect ratio variation on vessel was only effective at 11 knots speed which could reduce ship's resistance up to 17%. For speeds above 11 knots, increased in aspect ratio can reduce resistance but resistance on ships with straight Hull Vane® was still greater than on ships without Hull Vane® because lift force by Hull Vane® at ship stern was still too large, so the bow of ship was more submerged than ship without Hull Vane®. This caused value of the wetted surface area (WSA) and value of hydrodynamic pressure more increased than ships without Hull Vane®, so value of ship's resistance also increased.","PeriodicalId":263381,"journal":{"name":"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55981/wave.2023.926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In previous studies by Saputra, the use of straight Hull Vane® increased ship's resistance. Based on hypothesis, this was caused by lifting force from Hull Vane® being too large, so that ship experienced bow trim. To reduce bow trim, smaller Hull Vane® was made including Hull Vane® with AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9 and AR = 28.94 with speeds which were 11 knots (Fn = 0.34), 17 knots (Fn = 0.53), 20 knots (Fn = 0.62) and 26 knots (Fn = 0.8). From simulation results, it was found that use of a straight Hull Vane® in every aspect ratio variation on vessel was only effective at 11 knots speed which could reduce ship's resistance up to 17%. For speeds above 11 knots, increased in aspect ratio can reduce resistance but resistance on ships with straight Hull Vane® was still greater than on ships without Hull Vane® because lift force by Hull Vane® at ship stern was still too large, so the bow of ship was more submerged than ship without Hull Vane®. This caused value of the wetted surface area (WSA) and value of hydrodynamic pressure more increased than ships without Hull Vane®, so value of ship's resistance also increased.
船体叶片升力对快速船舶阻力的影响分析:直船体叶片
在Saputra之前的研究中,使用直船体叶片®增加了船舶的阻力。根据假设,这是由于船体叶片®的升力太大,因此船舶经历了船头修剪。为了减少船首纵倾,我们制造了更小的船体风帆®,包括风帆®的AR = 8.5, AR = 22.9和AR = 28.94,航速分别为11节(Fn = 0.34), 17节(Fn = 0.53), 20节(Fn = 0.62)和26节(Fn = 0.8)。从仿真结果中可以发现,在船舶的所有展弦比变化中,使用直船体叶片®仅在11节航速下有效,可以减少船舶阻力高达17%。当航速在11节以上时,增大展弦比可以减小阻力,但由于船体导叶在船尾的升力仍然太大,船首比没有船体导叶的船阻力更大。这使得船体的湿表面积(WSA)和动水压力值比没有船体叶片的船舶增大,因此船舶的阻力值也随之增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信