Artistic Thinking in Scientific Research

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Magda Stanová
{"title":"Artistic Thinking in Scientific Research","authors":"Magda Stanová","doi":"10.37522/aaav.109.2023.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Doctoral programs in the fine arts, instead of coming up with their own ways of doing things, tend to adopt standards from the humanities, which themselves tend to adopt standards from science. Because of being preoccupied with trying to look like other disciplines, artistic thinking within artistic doctorates gets suppressed. But if we look into science directly and not through this second-hand approach, we can find aspects of scientific thinking that are closer to art than to the humanities.
 In this paper, I give examples of artistic thinking in the work of various scientists and mathematicians: a non-fiction book that uses fiction (Douglas Hofstadter’s book Gödel, Escher, Bach), a linguistic analysis that concludes with a story (Livia Polanyi’s book Telling the American Story), scientific lectures with unusual formal aspects (Roger Penrose’s “VJing” of multiple layers of foils through an overhead projector, David Deutsch’s Lectures on Quantum Computation), and a collective hiding behind a fictional mathematician (Nicolas Bourbaki). I also briefly introduce the problem of verbal overshadowing and the effects it may have on the creative process in art.","PeriodicalId":36620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37522/aaav.109.2023.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Doctoral programs in the fine arts, instead of coming up with their own ways of doing things, tend to adopt standards from the humanities, which themselves tend to adopt standards from science. Because of being preoccupied with trying to look like other disciplines, artistic thinking within artistic doctorates gets suppressed. But if we look into science directly and not through this second-hand approach, we can find aspects of scientific thinking that are closer to art than to the humanities. In this paper, I give examples of artistic thinking in the work of various scientists and mathematicians: a non-fiction book that uses fiction (Douglas Hofstadter’s book Gödel, Escher, Bach), a linguistic analysis that concludes with a story (Livia Polanyi’s book Telling the American Story), scientific lectures with unusual formal aspects (Roger Penrose’s “VJing” of multiple layers of foils through an overhead projector, David Deutsch’s Lectures on Quantum Computation), and a collective hiding behind a fictional mathematician (Nicolas Bourbaki). I also briefly introduce the problem of verbal overshadowing and the effects it may have on the creative process in art.
科学研究中的艺术思维
美术领域的博士课程,不是有自己的做事方式,而是倾向于采用人文学科的标准,而人文学科本身又倾向于采用科学的标准。由于被试图看起来像其他学科所占据,艺术博士的艺术思维被压制了。但是,如果我们直接而不是通过这种二手方法来观察科学,我们就会发现科学思维的某些方面更接近艺术,而不是人文。在本文中,我列举了许多科学家和数学家工作中艺术思维的例子:一本使用虚构的非虚构书籍(道格拉斯·霍夫施塔特的书Gödel,埃舍尔,巴赫),一本以故事结尾的语言分析(利维娅·波兰尼的书《讲述美国故事》),具有不同寻常形式的科学讲座(罗杰·彭罗斯的《VJing》,通过投影仪多层箔片,大卫·多伊奇的《量子计算讲座》),以及一个虚构的数学家(尼古拉斯·布尔巴基)背后的集体隐藏。我还简要介绍了语言遮蔽的问题及其对艺术创作过程可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis
Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信