Can the role of the acromion index in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear be redefined with a different measurement technique?

Davut AYDIN, Murat KORKMAZ, Serhat DURUSOY, Hacı Ali OLÇAR, Muhammed SARIKAYA
{"title":"Can the role of the acromion index in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear be redefined with a different measurement technique?","authors":"Davut AYDIN, Murat KORKMAZ, Serhat DURUSOY, Hacı Ali OLÇAR, Muhammed SARIKAYA","doi":"10.16919/bozoktip.1292828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many radiographic parameters associated with rotator cuff tears (RCT) have been described. Our aim is to measure the capacity to predict RCT by reinterpreting the Acromion index (AI) with a new radiographic measurement technique.
 Methods: The shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) report of a total of 62 patients and AI measured with the new technique in shoulder radiographs were evaluated. On shoulder radiographs, the glenohumeral length was identified as the length between the lateral humerus tuberculum majus and the anterior midpoint of the glenoid joint. The glenoacromial length was also defined from a different perspective as the length between the lateral tip of the acromion and the anterior midpoint of the glenoid joint.
 Results: There was no significant difference in glenohumeral length between patients with complete and partial RCT and those without RCT (p value=0.163). There was no significant difference in glenoacromial length between these three groups of patients (Pvalue=0.110). It was concluded that there was no significant difference between the three groups of patients in terms of AI that we redefined (Pvalue=0.095).
 Conclusion: AI of the glenohumeral and glenoacromial lengths, which were redefined with a different measurement technique on the shoulder radiography, did not yield statistically significant results in the diagnosis of shoulder RCT.","PeriodicalId":483950,"journal":{"name":"Bozok tıp dergisi","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bozok tıp dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1292828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many radiographic parameters associated with rotator cuff tears (RCT) have been described. Our aim is to measure the capacity to predict RCT by reinterpreting the Acromion index (AI) with a new radiographic measurement technique. Methods: The shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) report of a total of 62 patients and AI measured with the new technique in shoulder radiographs were evaluated. On shoulder radiographs, the glenohumeral length was identified as the length between the lateral humerus tuberculum majus and the anterior midpoint of the glenoid joint. The glenoacromial length was also defined from a different perspective as the length between the lateral tip of the acromion and the anterior midpoint of the glenoid joint. Results: There was no significant difference in glenohumeral length between patients with complete and partial RCT and those without RCT (p value=0.163). There was no significant difference in glenoacromial length between these three groups of patients (Pvalue=0.110). It was concluded that there was no significant difference between the three groups of patients in terms of AI that we redefined (Pvalue=0.095). Conclusion: AI of the glenohumeral and glenoacromial lengths, which were redefined with a different measurement technique on the shoulder radiography, did not yield statistically significant results in the diagnosis of shoulder RCT.
肩峰指数在肩袖撕裂诊断中的作用可以用不同的测量技术重新定义吗?
背景:许多与肩袖撕裂(RCT)相关的影像学参数已经被描述过。我们的目标是通过使用一种新的放射测量技术重新解释肩峰指数(AI)来测量预测RCT的能力。方法:对62例患者的肩部磁共振成像(MRI)报告和新技术在肩部x线片上测量的AI进行评估。在肩部x线片上,肱骨盂长度被确定为肱骨外侧大结节和肩胛关节前中点之间的长度。肩胛峰长度也从另一个角度定义为肩胛峰外侧尖端到肩胛关节前中点之间的长度。 结果:完全、部分RCT组与未进行RCT组肩关节长度差异无统计学意义(p值=0.163)。三组患者肩胛峰长度差异无统计学意义(p值=0.110)。我们认为,三组患者在我们重新定义的AI方面没有显著差异(p值=0.095)。 结论:肩关节和肩峰长度的AI,通过不同的肩部x线片测量技术重新定义,在肩关节RCT诊断中没有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信