Evaluation of thyromental height test as a single anatomical measure for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: a prospective observational study

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anil Kumar Bhiwal, Charu Sharma, Anuj Tripathi, Aakansha BK, Vidhu Choudhary, Sunanda Gupta
{"title":"Evaluation of thyromental height test as a single anatomical measure for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy: a prospective observational study","authors":"Anil Kumar Bhiwal, Charu Sharma, Anuj Tripathi, Aakansha BK, Vidhu Choudhary, Sunanda Gupta","doi":"10.1186/s42077-023-00372-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Preoperative airway assessment is essential to predict difficult airway so that adequate planning could be made to secure the airway. Various airway tests have been devised to improve diagnostic accuracy but none of the tests individually have proven to be adequate. Recently, a new airway predictor thyromental height test (TMHT) appears to be a more accurate predictor of difficult laryngoscopy than the existing anatomical measurements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the TMHT and compare it with various screening tests to determine whether TMHT can prove to be a more comprehensive and accurate test for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Total 150 patients aged > 18 years of either sex with American Society of Anaesthesiologist physical status I—III scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation were included in this prospective observational study. All patients were subjected to a preoperative airway assessment test including TMHT, modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test, interincisior gap, thyromental distance and sternomental distance. Intraoperatively direct laryngoscopy was done and the grading of laryngoscopic view was done according to CL. Results The preoperative data and CL grading were used to evaluate the accuracy of TMHT and compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with other tests. Twenty six (17.33%) patients had difficult laryngoscopy and 18 patients (12%) required bougie/stylet to facilitate intubation. TMHT had the highest sensitivity (76.92%), specificity (98.38%), PPV (90.90%), NPV (95.31%) and accuracy (94.67%) when compared to other tests. Conclusions TMHT is a simple bedside test with higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting difficult laryngoscopy as compared to other screening tests.Future study should be done to define ethinicity, race, age groups and gender specific cut off values of TMHT for accurate validation of prediction in difficult laryngoscopy.","PeriodicalId":7686,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-023-00372-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Preoperative airway assessment is essential to predict difficult airway so that adequate planning could be made to secure the airway. Various airway tests have been devised to improve diagnostic accuracy but none of the tests individually have proven to be adequate. Recently, a new airway predictor thyromental height test (TMHT) appears to be a more accurate predictor of difficult laryngoscopy than the existing anatomical measurements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the TMHT and compare it with various screening tests to determine whether TMHT can prove to be a more comprehensive and accurate test for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Total 150 patients aged > 18 years of either sex with American Society of Anaesthesiologist physical status I—III scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation were included in this prospective observational study. All patients were subjected to a preoperative airway assessment test including TMHT, modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test, interincisior gap, thyromental distance and sternomental distance. Intraoperatively direct laryngoscopy was done and the grading of laryngoscopic view was done according to CL. Results The preoperative data and CL grading were used to evaluate the accuracy of TMHT and compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with other tests. Twenty six (17.33%) patients had difficult laryngoscopy and 18 patients (12%) required bougie/stylet to facilitate intubation. TMHT had the highest sensitivity (76.92%), specificity (98.38%), PPV (90.90%), NPV (95.31%) and accuracy (94.67%) when compared to other tests. Conclusions TMHT is a simple bedside test with higher sensitivity and specificity for predicting difficult laryngoscopy as compared to other screening tests.Future study should be done to define ethinicity, race, age groups and gender specific cut off values of TMHT for accurate validation of prediction in difficult laryngoscopy.
评价甲状腺高度测试作为预测喉镜检查困难的单一解剖学指标:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景术前气道评估对于预测困难气道至关重要,以便制定充分的计划来保护气道。为了提高诊断的准确性,已经设计了各种气道测试,但没有一种单独的测试被证明是足够的。最近,一种新的气道预测甲状腺高度测试(TMHT)似乎比现有的解剖测量更准确地预测困难的喉镜检查。本研究的目的是评估TMHT的准确性,并将其与各种筛查试验进行比较,以确定TMHT是否可以被证明是预测困难喉镜的更全面和准确的测试。150例,年龄>该前瞻性观察性研究纳入了年龄为18岁、经美国麻醉学会认证、身体状态为I-III、计划在全麻下进行择期手术、需要气管插管的男性和女性。所有患者术前气道评估试验包括TMHT、改良Mallampati试验、上唇咬合试验、切口间隙、甲状腺距离和胸骨距离。术中行直接喉镜检查,并按CL分级。结果采用术前资料和CL分级评价TMHT的准确性,并与其他检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值进行比较。26例(17.33%)患者存在喉镜检查困难,18例(12%)患者需要用支架或导管进行插管。TMHT具有最高的灵敏度(76.92%)、特异度(98.38%)、PPV(90.90%)、NPV(95.31%)和准确性(94.67%)。结论与其他筛查试验相比,TMHT是一种简单的床边试验,对预测喉镜困难具有更高的敏感性和特异性。未来的研究应明确民族、种族、年龄组和性别的TMHT截断值,以准确验证困难喉镜的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信