Language Teacher’s Experience and Preference toward Online Learning Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Q3 Social Sciences
Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam
{"title":"Language Teacher’s Experience and Preference toward Online Learning Platforms during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam","doi":"10.1155/2023/9932873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic compelled the educational sector to act quickly, resulting in the adoption of replacement online learning platforms (OLPs) to keep the educational system running throughout the crisis. This study explored how language teachers in Ethiopia are prepared in terms of their experience and preference toward OLPs. To achieve this goal, data were collected from 203 participants (aged 22–46, including 81 males and 122 females) using a self-perceived questionnaire. The data was then analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, and inferential statistics, including ANOVA tests, to determine the teachers’ experiences and preferences toward OLPs. The mean score of the teachers’ experience findings revealed a score of 3.406 out of a five-point Likert scale, and the preference subdimensions mean scores ranged from 3.164 to 3.476. The ANOVA findings revealed that, in the mean scores of language teachers’ experience toward OLPs ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ) and preferences toward OLPs, there were statistically significant differences for video streaming platforms ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ), digital reading materials platforms ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ), and mixed OLPs ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </math> ). Regarding the statistically significant correlation between language teachers’ experiences and preferences (LTEP) toward OLPs (except between video streaming platforms and digital reading materials platforms (r = −0.011, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M5\"> <mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.878</mn> </math> )), there was a statistically significant impact. Post hoc results showed, however, that there was no statistically significant correlation between language teachers’ preference dimensions. To summarize, Ethiopian language teachers preferred video streaming platforms and mixed OLPs over digital reading materials platforms. Moreover, further research into the LTEP toward OLPs in various ecological aspects is required.","PeriodicalId":45901,"journal":{"name":"Education Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9932873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic compelled the educational sector to act quickly, resulting in the adoption of replacement online learning platforms (OLPs) to keep the educational system running throughout the crisis. This study explored how language teachers in Ethiopia are prepared in terms of their experience and preference toward OLPs. To achieve this goal, data were collected from 203 participants (aged 22–46, including 81 males and 122 females) using a self-perceived questionnaire. The data was then analyzed using descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, and inferential statistics, including ANOVA tests, to determine the teachers’ experiences and preferences toward OLPs. The mean score of the teachers’ experience findings revealed a score of 3.406 out of a five-point Likert scale, and the preference subdimensions mean scores ranged from 3.164 to 3.476. The ANOVA findings revealed that, in the mean scores of language teachers’ experience toward OLPs ( p > 0.05 ) and preferences toward OLPs, there were statistically significant differences for video streaming platforms ( p > 0.05 ), digital reading materials platforms ( p > 0.05 ), and mixed OLPs ( p > 0.05 ). Regarding the statistically significant correlation between language teachers’ experiences and preferences (LTEP) toward OLPs (except between video streaming platforms and digital reading materials platforms (r = −0.011, p = 0.878 )), there was a statistically significant impact. Post hoc results showed, however, that there was no statistically significant correlation between language teachers’ preference dimensions. To summarize, Ethiopian language teachers preferred video streaming platforms and mixed OLPs over digital reading materials platforms. Moreover, further research into the LTEP toward OLPs in various ecological aspects is required.
新冠肺炎疫情期间语言教师对在线学习平台的体验与偏好
2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使教育部门迅速采取行动,导致采用替代在线学习平台(olp),以保持教育系统在危机期间的运行。本研究探讨了埃塞俄比亚的语言教师如何根据他们的经验和对外语教学对象的偏好进行准备。为了实现这一目标,使用自我感知问卷收集了203名参与者(年龄在22-46岁之间,包括81名男性和122名女性)的数据。然后使用描述性统计(包括均值和标准差)和推断性统计(包括方差分析)对数据进行分析,以确定教师的经验和对olp的偏好。教师体验调查的平均得分为3.406分(李克特5分制),偏好子维度的平均得分为3.164 ~ 3.476分。方差分析结果显示,在语言教师对残障学生体验的平均得分中(p >0.05)和对olp的偏好,视频流媒体平台的差异有统计学意义(p >0.05),数字阅读材料平台(p >0.05),混合olp (p >0.05)。对于语言教师对在线阅读课程的体验与偏好(LTEP)之间存在统计学意义的相关(视频流平台与数字阅读材料平台之间除外(r = - 0.011, p = 0.878),存在统计学意义的影响。然而,事后结果显示,语言教师的偏好维度之间没有统计学上的显著相关。综上所述,与数字阅读材料平台相比,埃塞俄比亚语言教师更喜欢视频流媒体平台和混合联机教学项目。此外,还需要进一步研究LTEP在各个生态方面对olp的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Research International
Education Research International EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信