Masculinity and Gatekeeping in Depictions of the Restoration Coffeehouse

IF 0.1 3区 文学 Q4 Arts and Humanities
Erin Keating
{"title":"Masculinity and Gatekeeping in Depictions of the Restoration Coffeehouse","authors":"Erin Keating","doi":"10.1353/ecy.2023.a906892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Examining a wide range of literary attacks against London coffeehouses during the Restoration period, I argue that, far from embracing the democratizing elements of the coffeehouse, this literature reveals the ways that writers pushed back against the popularity of these new public spaces. My argument demonstrates the complex modes of gatekeeping revealed by the many attacks on these emerging publics that were being used to police the boundaries of traditional privileges and uphold dominant ideologies around status and, in the process, to empty the early coffeehouses of participants. These attacks were based in ideologies of gender, race, and status and were intimately tied to cultural anxieties about the free flow of certain types of information, often but not always political in nature. While critical and historical discussions of the early coffeehouses in England tend to focus on their links to the rising public sphere and the growth of participatory politics and public opinion in England, I argue that focusing on the literary attacks against the early coffeehouses demonstrates the complex resistances to and attempts at gatekeeping against these political changes that characterized the coffeehouses' early introduction into Restoration London.","PeriodicalId":54033,"journal":{"name":"EIGHTEENTH CENTURY-THEORY AND INTERPRETATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGHTEENTH CENTURY-THEORY AND INTERPRETATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecy.2023.a906892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Examining a wide range of literary attacks against London coffeehouses during the Restoration period, I argue that, far from embracing the democratizing elements of the coffeehouse, this literature reveals the ways that writers pushed back against the popularity of these new public spaces. My argument demonstrates the complex modes of gatekeeping revealed by the many attacks on these emerging publics that were being used to police the boundaries of traditional privileges and uphold dominant ideologies around status and, in the process, to empty the early coffeehouses of participants. These attacks were based in ideologies of gender, race, and status and were intimately tied to cultural anxieties about the free flow of certain types of information, often but not always political in nature. While critical and historical discussions of the early coffeehouses in England tend to focus on their links to the rising public sphere and the growth of participatory politics and public opinion in England, I argue that focusing on the literary attacks against the early coffeehouses demonstrates the complex resistances to and attempts at gatekeeping against these political changes that characterized the coffeehouses' early introduction into Restoration London.
复辟时期咖啡馆描写中的男子气概和守门人
摘要:在复辟时期对伦敦咖啡馆的广泛文学攻击中,我认为,这些文献远非拥抱咖啡馆的民主化元素,而是揭示了作家反对这些新公共空间流行的方式。我的论点展示了对这些新兴公众的许多攻击所揭示的复杂的守门人模式,这些攻击被用来监督传统特权的边界,维护围绕地位的主导意识形态,并在此过程中,将早期的咖啡馆里的参与者清空。这些攻击基于性别、种族和地位的意识形态,并与对某些类型信息自由流动的文化焦虑密切相关,这些信息通常但不总是政治性的。尽管对英国早期咖啡馆的批判和历史讨论倾向于关注它们与英国日益兴起的公共领域、参与性政治和公众舆论的增长之间的联系,但我认为,关注对早期咖啡馆的文学攻击,表明了对这些政治变化的复杂抵制和试图把关,这些变化是咖啡馆早期引入伦敦复辟时期的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY-THEORY AND INTERPRETATION
EIGHTEENTH CENTURY-THEORY AND INTERPRETATION LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信