Personalism, personology, personalization, personalized education: On the terms and concepts

A. Brenchugina-Romanova, L. Denisova
{"title":"Personalism, personology, personalization, personalized education: On the terms and concepts","authors":"A. Brenchugina-Romanova, L. Denisova","doi":"10.26907/2782-4756-2023-72-2-199-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article highlights the history of the emergence and development of personalism in world science. We analyze modern terms and propose concepts, related to personalized education. The article reviews the works of famous scientists and philosophers in Russia and abroad (F. Schleiermacher, F. Aquinsky, E. Kant, E. Munier, etc.) and considers the issues of personality theory (theory of needs) in the works of G. A. Murray. We also present the views of leading Russian scientists – representatives of psychological science – on the issue under study (N. A. Berdyaev, L. M. Lopatin, etc.), identify and compare the definitions of the personalization concept, found in different fields of science (A. G. Asmolov, D. A. Leontiev, A. B. Orlov, V. A. Petrovsky, E. B. Starovoitenko), clarifying some modern definitions of the personalized education concept. The article determines the features of the personalized education concept (D. S. Ermakov, P. N. Kirillov, N. I. Koryakina) and notes the differences in the understanding and application of the terms “personalized learning” and “personalized approach to learning”. The personalized model of education in relation to secondary and higher education is characterized by the example of a higher school (Tyumen State University; a joint project of NUST “MISIS”, Tomsk University of Control Systems and Radio Electronics, MPSU).","PeriodicalId":474357,"journal":{"name":"Philology and Culture","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2023-72-2-199-203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article highlights the history of the emergence and development of personalism in world science. We analyze modern terms and propose concepts, related to personalized education. The article reviews the works of famous scientists and philosophers in Russia and abroad (F. Schleiermacher, F. Aquinsky, E. Kant, E. Munier, etc.) and considers the issues of personality theory (theory of needs) in the works of G. A. Murray. We also present the views of leading Russian scientists – representatives of psychological science – on the issue under study (N. A. Berdyaev, L. M. Lopatin, etc.), identify and compare the definitions of the personalization concept, found in different fields of science (A. G. Asmolov, D. A. Leontiev, A. B. Orlov, V. A. Petrovsky, E. B. Starovoitenko), clarifying some modern definitions of the personalized education concept. The article determines the features of the personalized education concept (D. S. Ermakov, P. N. Kirillov, N. I. Koryakina) and notes the differences in the understanding and application of the terms “personalized learning” and “personalized approach to learning”. The personalized model of education in relation to secondary and higher education is characterized by the example of a higher school (Tyumen State University; a joint project of NUST “MISIS”, Tomsk University of Control Systems and Radio Electronics, MPSU).
人格论、人格学、个性化、个性化教育:术语和概念
本文着重论述了人格论在世界科学中产生和发展的历史。我们分析了与个性化教育相关的现代术语并提出了相关概念。本文回顾了国内外著名科学家和哲学家(施莱尔马赫、阿奎斯基、康德、穆尼尔等)的著作,并对穆雷著作中的人格理论(需求理论)问题进行了思考。我们还介绍了俄罗斯顶尖科学家——心理科学的代表——对所研究问题的看法(N. A.别尔佳耶夫,L. M.洛帕廷等),识别并比较了不同科学领域对个性化概念的定义(A. G. Asmolov, D. A. Leontiev, A. B. Orlov, V. A. Petrovsky, E. B. Starovoitenko),澄清了个性化教育概念的一些现代定义。本文确定了个性化教育概念的特征(D. S. Ermakov, P. N. Kirillov, N. I. Koryakina),并指出了对“个性化学习”和“个性化学习方法”这两个术语的理解和应用的差异。与中等教育和高等教育相关的个性化教育模式以高等学校为例(秋明国立大学;俄罗斯国立科技大学“MISIS”与托木斯克控制系统和无线电电子大学(MPSU)的联合项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信