Comparing tuberculosis symptom screening to chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in an active case finding campaign in Northeast Nigeria

IF 5.1
Stephen John, Suraj Abdulkarim, Salisu Usman, Md. Toufiq Rahman, Jacob Creswell
{"title":"Comparing tuberculosis symptom screening to chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in an active case finding campaign in Northeast Nigeria","authors":"Stephen John, Suraj Abdulkarim, Salisu Usman, Md. Toufiq Rahman, Jacob Creswell","doi":"10.1186/s44263-023-00017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Ultra-portable X-ray devices with artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly used to screen for tuberculosis (TB). Few studies have documented their performance. We aimed to evaluate the performance of chest X-ray (CXR) and symptom screening for active case finding of TB among remote populations using ultra-portable X-ray and AI. Methods We organized screening camps in rural northeast Nigeria, and all consenting individuals ≥ 15 years were screened for TB symptoms (cough, fever, night sweats, and weight loss) and received a CXR. We used a MinXray Impact system interpreted by AI (qXR V3), which is a wireless setup and can be run without electricity. We collected sputum samples from individuals with an qXR abnormality score of 0.30 or higher or if they reported any TB symptoms. Samples were tested with Xpert MTB/RIF. We documented the TB screening cascade and evaluated the performance of screening with different combinations of symptoms and CXR interpreted by AI. Results We screened 5297 individuals during 66 camps: 2684 (51%) were females, and 2613 (49%) were males. Using ≥ 2 weeks of cough to define presumptive TB, 1056 people (20%) would be identified. If a cough of any duration was used, the number with presumptive TB increased to 1889 (36%) and to 3083 (58%) if any of the four symptoms were used. Overall, 769 (14.5%) had abnormality scores of 0.3 or higher, and 447 (8.4%) had a score of 0.5 or higher. We collected 1021 samples for Xpert testing and detected 85 (8%) individuals with TB. Screening for prolonged cough only identified 40% of people with TB. Any symptom detected 90.6% of people with TB, but specificity was 11.4%. Using an AI abnormality score of 0.50 identified 89.4% of people with TB with a specificity of 62.8%. Conclusions Ultra-portable CXR can be used to provide more efficient TB screening in hard-to-reach areas. Symptom screening missed large proportions of people with bacteriologically confirmed TB. Employing AI to read CXR can improve triaging when human readers are unavailable and can save expensive diagnostic testing costs.","PeriodicalId":262397,"journal":{"name":"BMC Global and Public Health","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Global and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-023-00017-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Ultra-portable X-ray devices with artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly used to screen for tuberculosis (TB). Few studies have documented their performance. We aimed to evaluate the performance of chest X-ray (CXR) and symptom screening for active case finding of TB among remote populations using ultra-portable X-ray and AI. Methods We organized screening camps in rural northeast Nigeria, and all consenting individuals ≥ 15 years were screened for TB symptoms (cough, fever, night sweats, and weight loss) and received a CXR. We used a MinXray Impact system interpreted by AI (qXR V3), which is a wireless setup and can be run without electricity. We collected sputum samples from individuals with an qXR abnormality score of 0.30 or higher or if they reported any TB symptoms. Samples were tested with Xpert MTB/RIF. We documented the TB screening cascade and evaluated the performance of screening with different combinations of symptoms and CXR interpreted by AI. Results We screened 5297 individuals during 66 camps: 2684 (51%) were females, and 2613 (49%) were males. Using ≥ 2 weeks of cough to define presumptive TB, 1056 people (20%) would be identified. If a cough of any duration was used, the number with presumptive TB increased to 1889 (36%) and to 3083 (58%) if any of the four symptoms were used. Overall, 769 (14.5%) had abnormality scores of 0.3 or higher, and 447 (8.4%) had a score of 0.5 or higher. We collected 1021 samples for Xpert testing and detected 85 (8%) individuals with TB. Screening for prolonged cough only identified 40% of people with TB. Any symptom detected 90.6% of people with TB, but specificity was 11.4%. Using an AI abnormality score of 0.50 identified 89.4% of people with TB with a specificity of 62.8%. Conclusions Ultra-portable CXR can be used to provide more efficient TB screening in hard-to-reach areas. Symptom screening missed large proportions of people with bacteriologically confirmed TB. Employing AI to read CXR can improve triaging when human readers are unavailable and can save expensive diagnostic testing costs.
在尼日利亚东北部开展的积极病例发现运动中,比较结核症状筛查与人工智能胸部x线检查
人工智能(AI)超便携x射线设备越来越多地用于结核病(TB)筛查。很少有研究记录他们的表现。我们的目的是评估使用超便携x线和人工智能在偏远人群中使用胸部x线(CXR)和症状筛查来主动发现结核病病例的表现。方法:我们在尼日利亚东北部农村组织筛查营,对所有≥15岁的同意个体进行结核病症状(咳嗽、发烧、盗汗和体重减轻)筛查,并接受CXR。我们使用了由AI (qXR V3)解释的MinXray Impact系统,这是一种无线设置,可以在没有电的情况下运行。我们收集了qXR异常评分为0.30或更高或报告有任何结核症状的个体的痰样本。样品采用Xpert MTB/RIF检测。我们记录了结核病筛查级联,并评估了AI解释的症状和CXR的不同组合的筛查效果。结果共筛查66个营地5297人,其中女性2684人(51%),男性2613人(49%)。使用≥2周的咳嗽来确定推定结核病,1056人(20%)将被确定。如果使用任何持续时间的咳嗽,推定结核病的人数增加到1889人(36%),如果使用四种症状中的任何一种,则增加到3083人(58%)。总体而言,769例(14.5%)的异常评分在0.3以上,447例(8.4%)的异常评分在0.5以上。我们收集了1021份样本进行Xpert检测,检测出85例(8%)结核病患者。对长时间咳嗽的筛查只发现了40%的结核病患者。90.6%的结核病患者可检出任何症状,但特异性为11.4%。使用0.50的AI异常评分确定了89.4%的结核病患者,特异性为62.8%。结论超便携CXR可在交通不便地区提供更有效的结核病筛查。症状筛查漏掉了很大一部分细菌学证实的结核病患者。使用人工智能来读取CXR可以在没有人类读者的情况下改善分诊,并节省昂贵的诊断测试成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书