Causes for the absence of thrombocytopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: A case-control study

Maria Y. Nadinskaia, Khava B. Kodzoeva, Kseniya A. Gulyaeva, Mariia-Doris E. Khen, Diana I. Koroleva, Vladimir T. Ivashkin
{"title":"Causes for the absence of thrombocytopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: A case-control study","authors":"Maria Y. Nadinskaia, Khava B. Kodzoeva, Kseniya A. Gulyaeva, Mariia-Doris E. Khen, Diana I. Koroleva, Vladimir T. Ivashkin","doi":"10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Complications of liver cirrhosis (LC), such as thrombocytopenia and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), have similar pathophysiology. However, the association between PVT and platelet count in LC patients is contradictory.
 Aim: To assess factors affecting the platelet count in patients with LC and PVT.
 Materials and methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. The cases were 114 patients with LC of various etiologies and newly diagnosed PVT unrelated to invasive hepatocellular carcinoma. From the database of LC patients without PVT, 228 controls were randomly selected with stratification by gender, age and etiology of cirrhosis. The patients from both groups were divided into subgroups with thrombocytopenia ( 150 109/L) and without thrombocytopenia ( 150 109/L). We analyzed the LC etiology, portal hypertension severity (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, gastroesophageal varices and associated bleedings, the spleen length, and portal vein diameter), laboratory parameters (white blood cell counts, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin levels, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, fibrinogen, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prothrombin); also, the rates of newly diagnosed malignant tumors was assessed. The statistical analysis included calculation of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), logistic regression models with assessment of the model accuracy, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC).
 Results: There were no differences in the severity of thrombocytopenia between the case and control groups: thrombocytopenia was severe in 15.8% (18 patients) vs 13.6% (31 patients, p = 0.586); moderate, in 41.2% (47 patients) vs 46.1% (105 patients, p = 0.398) and mild, in 31.6% (36 patients) vs 24.5% (56 patients, p = 0.168). The proportion of the patients without thrombocytopenia was 11.4% (13 patients) in the case group and 15.8% (36 patients) in the control group, with the between-group difference being non-significant (p = 0.276). In the subgroups of patients without thrombocytopenia (both in the cases and in the controls), the proportion alcoholic etiology of LC, white blood cells counts, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and fibrinogen concentrations were significantly higher (p 0.05) than in those with thrombocytopenia. The model based on the outcome \"absence of thrombocytopenia\" included white blood cells counts, hemoglobin and albumin levels, the presence of newly diagnosed malignant tumors in the case group (model accuracy 90.4%, AUC 0.873), and neutrophil counts and spleen length in the control group (model accuracy 86.4%, AUC 0.855). In the patients with PVT and platelet counts of 150 109/L, the OR for all newly diagnosed malignant tumors was 26.3 (95% CI 7.3793.97, р 0.0001), for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma without portal vein invasion 17.42 (95% CI 4.8462.65, р 0.0001).
 Conclusion: In LC patients, the prevalence and severity of thrombocytopenia are not different depending on the PVT presence or absence. The absence of thrombocytopenia in PVT patients is associated with a higher risk of malignant tumors identification, primarily that of hepatocellular carcinoma.","PeriodicalId":31492,"journal":{"name":"Al''manah Kliniceskoj Mediciny","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al''manah Kliniceskoj Mediciny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complications of liver cirrhosis (LC), such as thrombocytopenia and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), have similar pathophysiology. However, the association between PVT and platelet count in LC patients is contradictory. Aim: To assess factors affecting the platelet count in patients with LC and PVT. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. The cases were 114 patients with LC of various etiologies and newly diagnosed PVT unrelated to invasive hepatocellular carcinoma. From the database of LC patients without PVT, 228 controls were randomly selected with stratification by gender, age and etiology of cirrhosis. The patients from both groups were divided into subgroups with thrombocytopenia ( 150 109/L) and without thrombocytopenia ( 150 109/L). We analyzed the LC etiology, portal hypertension severity (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, gastroesophageal varices and associated bleedings, the spleen length, and portal vein diameter), laboratory parameters (white blood cell counts, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin levels, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, fibrinogen, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prothrombin); also, the rates of newly diagnosed malignant tumors was assessed. The statistical analysis included calculation of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), logistic regression models with assessment of the model accuracy, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: There were no differences in the severity of thrombocytopenia between the case and control groups: thrombocytopenia was severe in 15.8% (18 patients) vs 13.6% (31 patients, p = 0.586); moderate, in 41.2% (47 patients) vs 46.1% (105 patients, p = 0.398) and mild, in 31.6% (36 patients) vs 24.5% (56 patients, p = 0.168). The proportion of the patients without thrombocytopenia was 11.4% (13 patients) in the case group and 15.8% (36 patients) in the control group, with the between-group difference being non-significant (p = 0.276). In the subgroups of patients without thrombocytopenia (both in the cases and in the controls), the proportion alcoholic etiology of LC, white blood cells counts, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and fibrinogen concentrations were significantly higher (p 0.05) than in those with thrombocytopenia. The model based on the outcome "absence of thrombocytopenia" included white blood cells counts, hemoglobin and albumin levels, the presence of newly diagnosed malignant tumors in the case group (model accuracy 90.4%, AUC 0.873), and neutrophil counts and spleen length in the control group (model accuracy 86.4%, AUC 0.855). In the patients with PVT and platelet counts of 150 109/L, the OR for all newly diagnosed malignant tumors was 26.3 (95% CI 7.3793.97, р 0.0001), for newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma without portal vein invasion 17.42 (95% CI 4.8462.65, р 0.0001). Conclusion: In LC patients, the prevalence and severity of thrombocytopenia are not different depending on the PVT presence or absence. The absence of thrombocytopenia in PVT patients is associated with a higher risk of malignant tumors identification, primarily that of hepatocellular carcinoma.
肝硬化和门静脉血栓患者无血小板减少的原因:一项病例对照研究
背景:肝硬化(LC)并发症,如血小板减少症和门静脉血栓形成(PVT),具有相似的病理生理。然而,LC患者PVT与血小板计数之间的关系是矛盾的。 目的:探讨影响LC合并PVT患者血小板计数的因素。 材料和方法:本研究为回顾性病例对照研究。114例不同病因的LC和与浸润性肝癌无关的新诊断PVT患者。从无PVT的LC患者数据库中,随机选择228例对照,按性别、年龄和肝硬化病因分层。两组患者分为血小板减少组(150 109/L)和非血小板减少组(150 109/L)。我们分析了LC的病因、门静脉高压的严重程度(腹水、肝性脑病、胃食管静脉曲张及相关出血、脾脏长度和门静脉直径)、实验室参数(白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、血红蛋白水平、总蛋白、白蛋白、总胆红素、纤维蛋白原、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞之比和凝血酶原);此外,还评估了新诊断的恶性肿瘤的发生率。统计分析包括计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI), logistic回归模型及评估模型准确性,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:病例组与对照组血小板减少严重程度差异无统计学意义:重度血小板减少15.8%(18例)vs 13.6%(31例,p = 0.586);中度,41.2%(47例)vs 46.1%(105例,p = 0.398);轻度,31.6%(36例)vs 24.5%(56例,p = 0.168)。病例组无血小板减少患者占11.4%(13例),对照组无血小板减少患者占15.8%(36例),组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.276)。在无血小板减少患者亚组中(包括病例和对照组),LC的酒精病因比例、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和纤维蛋白原浓度显著高于血小板减少患者(p 0.05)。基于“无血小板减少”结果的模型包括病例组的白细胞计数、血红蛋白和白蛋白水平、新诊断的恶性肿瘤的存在(模型精度90.4%,AUC 0.873),对照组的中性粒细胞计数和脾脏长度(模型精度86.4%,AUC 0.855)。在PVT和血小板计数为150 109/L的患者中,所有新诊断的恶性肿瘤的OR为26.3 (95% CI 7.3793.97, 0.0001),新诊断的未侵犯门静脉的肝细胞癌的OR为17.42 (95% CI 4.8462.65, 0.0001)。结论:在LC患者中,血小板减少的发生率和严重程度并不取决于PVT的存在与否。PVT患者没有血小板减少症与恶性肿瘤鉴定的高风险相关,主要是肝细胞癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信