Designing and Validating a Training Model for the Staff of the Incident Command System in the Hospitals

Arezou Porkar, Sadraddin Sattari, Mohammad Taghi Moghadamnia
{"title":"Designing and Validating a Training Model for the Staff of the Incident Command System in the Hospitals","authors":"Arezou Porkar, Sadraddin Sattari, Mohammad Taghi Moghadamnia","doi":"10.34172/doh.2023.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The main influencing factor in the success of the crisis management process is the group's readiness to deal with the crisis. Training models are a tool to maintain the preparation of personnel, increase their ability to achieve certain goals, and help them acquire information, skills, and ways of thinking. This research aimed to design and validate a training model for the staff of the hospital incident command system. Methods. The research method was a qualitative-quantitative (mixed method) approach. The statistical population in the qualitative part included experts in the field of incident command system, and in the quantitative part included managers and staff of this system in the hospitals of Guilan province in Iran. The sampling method in the qualitative part was the judgmental forecasting method. Also, the sampling method was cluster random in the quantitative part. According to the data saturation principle, the sample size in the qualitative section was 15 people, and in the quantitative section, 226 people were selected based on Cochran's formula. The data collection tool in the qualitative part was a semi-structured interview and in the quantitative part was a questionnaire extracted from the interview. Results. After analyzing the categories resulting from interviews with 15 experts, 43 open codes and 12 central codes were determined. Also, five selection codes were obtained as follows: design, analysis, evaluation and feedback, policy making and determination of strategies, and implementation and support dimension. The findings showed that the design dimension had a more significant effect on designing the training model (path coefficient = 0.987 and T = 176.713). Also, all components had a significant relationship in pattern design. For data analysis, we used the MAXQDA 2020 and SmartPls 3 software in the qualitative part, and SPSS 26 software in the quantitative part. Conclusion. The results of this research showed that effective command in possible incidents depends on the effective training of employees with a new and up-to-date model.","PeriodicalId":31241,"journal":{"name":"Tasviri salamat","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tasviri salamat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/doh.2023.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The main influencing factor in the success of the crisis management process is the group's readiness to deal with the crisis. Training models are a tool to maintain the preparation of personnel, increase their ability to achieve certain goals, and help them acquire information, skills, and ways of thinking. This research aimed to design and validate a training model for the staff of the hospital incident command system. Methods. The research method was a qualitative-quantitative (mixed method) approach. The statistical population in the qualitative part included experts in the field of incident command system, and in the quantitative part included managers and staff of this system in the hospitals of Guilan province in Iran. The sampling method in the qualitative part was the judgmental forecasting method. Also, the sampling method was cluster random in the quantitative part. According to the data saturation principle, the sample size in the qualitative section was 15 people, and in the quantitative section, 226 people were selected based on Cochran's formula. The data collection tool in the qualitative part was a semi-structured interview and in the quantitative part was a questionnaire extracted from the interview. Results. After analyzing the categories resulting from interviews with 15 experts, 43 open codes and 12 central codes were determined. Also, five selection codes were obtained as follows: design, analysis, evaluation and feedback, policy making and determination of strategies, and implementation and support dimension. The findings showed that the design dimension had a more significant effect on designing the training model (path coefficient = 0.987 and T = 176.713). Also, all components had a significant relationship in pattern design. For data analysis, we used the MAXQDA 2020 and SmartPls 3 software in the qualitative part, and SPSS 26 software in the quantitative part. Conclusion. The results of this research showed that effective command in possible incidents depends on the effective training of employees with a new and up-to-date model.
医院事故指挥系统人员培训模式的设计与验证
背景。危机管理过程成功的主要影响因素是集团应对危机的准备程度。培训模式是一种保持人员准备,提高其实现一定目标的能力,并帮助他们获取信息、技能和思维方式的工具。本研究旨在设计并验证医院事故指挥系统工作人员的培训模型。方法。研究方法采用定性-定量(混合)方法。定性部分的统计人群包括事故指挥系统领域的专家,定量部分的统计人群包括伊朗桂兰省医院事故指挥系统的管理人员和工作人员。定性部分的抽样方法为判断预测法。定量部分采用聚类随机抽样。根据数据饱和原理,定性部分的样本量为15人,定量部分的样本量根据科克伦公式选取226人。定性部分的数据收集工具为半结构化访谈,定量部分的数据收集工具为访谈中提取的问卷。结果。通过对15位专家访谈得出的分类进行分析,确定了43个开放码和12个中心码。得到设计、分析、评价与反馈、政策制定与战略确定、实施与支持维度五个选择码。结果显示,设计维度对训练模型设计的影响更为显著(路径系数= 0.987,T = 176.713)。同时,各成分在模式设计上有显著的相关性。在数据分析方面,我们使用MAXQDA 2020和SmartPls 3软件进行定性分析,使用SPSS 26软件进行定量分析。结论。本研究结果表明,在可能发生的事件中,有效的指挥取决于对员工进行有效的培训,并采用新的和最新的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信