Labor Induction in Case of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)

{"title":"Labor Induction in Case of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/mcr.08.10.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinicians consider a range of variables when formulating decisions regarding the diagnosis, monitoring plan, and ultimately the decision to recommend the delivery of a growth-restricted fetus. The differential diagnosis of a pathological fetal growth pattern is initially considered via the history, a physical and laboratory examination of the pregnant person, as well as a comprehensive fetal ultrasound examination. These factors allow a broad distinction between pre-existing disease in the pregnant person, constitutionally small normal growth, placenta-mediated Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR), and intrinsic fetal disease. Most commonly, pathological growth restriction is mediated by underlying placental diseases, of which maternal vascular malperfusion is the most common, and often results in co-existent hypertension. A program of combined monitoring of the pregnant person and fetus, comprising hypertension assessment, and serial fetal ultrasound, including Doppler studies is then instituted, and may be combined with biochemical markers, such as Placental Growth Factor, for greater clinical precision. Recommendations on timing to deliver the growth-restricted fetus worldwide are converging, with similar guidance from clinical practice guidelines informed by high-quality Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and large cohort studies. In most instances, it is reasonable to recommend delivery of all growth-restricted fetuses by approximately 38 weeks. Timing of delivery should take into consideration both short-term neonatal outcomes and long-term outcomes at school age. Mode of delivery is based on many factors, and induction of labor is a safe approach, especially after 34 weeks. Mechanical methods of induction may be preferred to pharmacologic methods, although both have a role and the choice of method is based on individualized assessment. Elective Cesarean birth thereby bypassing fetal stress during labor, is recommended in preterm growth-restricted fetuses with signs of adaptive fetal compromise, especially when ductus venosus flow is abnormal, or a contraction stress test is positive.","PeriodicalId":9304,"journal":{"name":"British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/mcr.08.10.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinicians consider a range of variables when formulating decisions regarding the diagnosis, monitoring plan, and ultimately the decision to recommend the delivery of a growth-restricted fetus. The differential diagnosis of a pathological fetal growth pattern is initially considered via the history, a physical and laboratory examination of the pregnant person, as well as a comprehensive fetal ultrasound examination. These factors allow a broad distinction between pre-existing disease in the pregnant person, constitutionally small normal growth, placenta-mediated Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR), and intrinsic fetal disease. Most commonly, pathological growth restriction is mediated by underlying placental diseases, of which maternal vascular malperfusion is the most common, and often results in co-existent hypertension. A program of combined monitoring of the pregnant person and fetus, comprising hypertension assessment, and serial fetal ultrasound, including Doppler studies is then instituted, and may be combined with biochemical markers, such as Placental Growth Factor, for greater clinical precision. Recommendations on timing to deliver the growth-restricted fetus worldwide are converging, with similar guidance from clinical practice guidelines informed by high-quality Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and large cohort studies. In most instances, it is reasonable to recommend delivery of all growth-restricted fetuses by approximately 38 weeks. Timing of delivery should take into consideration both short-term neonatal outcomes and long-term outcomes at school age. Mode of delivery is based on many factors, and induction of labor is a safe approach, especially after 34 weeks. Mechanical methods of induction may be preferred to pharmacologic methods, although both have a role and the choice of method is based on individualized assessment. Elective Cesarean birth thereby bypassing fetal stress during labor, is recommended in preterm growth-restricted fetuses with signs of adaptive fetal compromise, especially when ductus venosus flow is abnormal, or a contraction stress test is positive.
胎儿生长受限(FGR)的引产
临床医生在制定有关诊断、监测计划以及最终建议分娩生长受限胎儿的决定时,会考虑一系列变量。病理性胎儿生长模式的鉴别诊断最初是通过病史、孕妇的身体和实验室检查以及全面的胎儿超声检查来考虑的。这些因素允许在孕妇中预先存在的疾病、体质上的正常生长小、胎盘介导的胎儿生长限制(FGR)和内在胎儿疾病之间进行广泛的区分。最常见的是,病理性生长限制是由潜在的胎盘疾病介导的,其中最常见的是母体血管灌注不良,并经常导致共存的高血压。对孕妇和胎儿进行联合监测,包括高血压评估和包括多普勒研究在内的一系列胎儿超声,并可与生化标志物(如胎盘生长因子)相结合,以提高临床准确性。世界范围内关于分娩生长受限胎儿时机的建议正在趋同,高质量随机对照试验(RCTs)和大型队列研究提供的临床实践指南也提供了类似的指导。在大多数情况下,建议在大约38周分娩所有生长受限胎儿是合理的。分娩时间应考虑到短期新生儿结局和学龄期长期结局。分娩方式取决于许多因素,引产是一种安全的方法,特别是在34周后。机械诱导方法可能优于药理学方法,尽管两者都有作用,方法的选择是基于个体化评估。选择性剖宫产可绕过分娩过程中的胎儿应激,推荐用于有适应性胎儿妥协迹象的生长受限的早产胎儿,特别是当静脉导管流量异常或收缩应激试验呈阳性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信