Antecedent Factors Influencing Teacher’s Readiness in Teaching Design and Technology Education

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zaleha Endot, Rahimah Jamaluddin
{"title":"Antecedent Factors Influencing Teacher’s Readiness in Teaching Design and Technology Education","authors":"Zaleha Endot, Rahimah Jamaluddin","doi":"10.30880/jtet.2023.15.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teacher readiness is necessary in the teaching and learning process, especially when a new curriculum is introduced. This study was conducted to identify the factors that influence the readiness of teachers in teaching Design and Technology (RBT) in the new Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR). The factors studied included self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, ICT skills, and support training, which were the independent variables, and teacher readiness was the dependent variable. This descriptive quantitative survey involved 368 RBT teachers teaching Year 4 KSSR students in Peninsular Malaysia. Cluster and simple random sampling were used to select the sample of this study. The research instrument consisted of a set of questionnaires that contained 114 items adapted from previous research. A pilot study was conducted with a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.95. Study data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The results of the study show that the overall mean for teachers’ readiness in teaching RBT is high. The findings showed that the overall mean for the aspect of reasoning knowledge was 3.82 (SP = .57) and SBA skills were 3.92 (SP = .58). Findings give the impression that the respondents have high reasoning knowledge and PBS skills. It was also found that the mean value for the aspect of SBA skills is higher than the reasoning knowledge. The regression analysis results show that all four factors significantly contribute to teacher readiness at 40.4 %. In conclusion, the findings of this study give the impression that the factors influencing teacher readiness are important in the formulation of a new curriculum. This study provides guidance to policy makers and curriculum planners especially for Ministry of Education Malaysia (KPM) on the aspect of teacher readiness when introducing new subjects.","PeriodicalId":43208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.03.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teacher readiness is necessary in the teaching and learning process, especially when a new curriculum is introduced. This study was conducted to identify the factors that influence the readiness of teachers in teaching Design and Technology (RBT) in the new Primary School Standard Curriculum (KSSR). The factors studied included self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, ICT skills, and support training, which were the independent variables, and teacher readiness was the dependent variable. This descriptive quantitative survey involved 368 RBT teachers teaching Year 4 KSSR students in Peninsular Malaysia. Cluster and simple random sampling were used to select the sample of this study. The research instrument consisted of a set of questionnaires that contained 114 items adapted from previous research. A pilot study was conducted with a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.95. Study data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The results of the study show that the overall mean for teachers’ readiness in teaching RBT is high. The findings showed that the overall mean for the aspect of reasoning knowledge was 3.82 (SP = .57) and SBA skills were 3.92 (SP = .58). Findings give the impression that the respondents have high reasoning knowledge and PBS skills. It was also found that the mean value for the aspect of SBA skills is higher than the reasoning knowledge. The regression analysis results show that all four factors significantly contribute to teacher readiness at 40.4 %. In conclusion, the findings of this study give the impression that the factors influencing teacher readiness are important in the formulation of a new curriculum. This study provides guidance to policy makers and curriculum planners especially for Ministry of Education Malaysia (KPM) on the aspect of teacher readiness when introducing new subjects.
教学设计与技术教育中影响教师准备的前因因素
教师准备在教学过程中是必要的,特别是在引入新课程时。本研究旨在探讨新小学标准课程(KSSR)中教师对设计与技术(RBT)教学准备的影响因素。自变量为自我效能感、内在动机、ICT技能和支持培训,因变量为教师准备程度。本描述性定量调查涉及马来西亚半岛368名教授KSSR四年级学生的RBT教师。本研究的样本选择采用整群抽样和简单随机抽样。研究工具包括一套调查问卷,其中包含114个项目,改编自以往的研究。进行初步研究,Cronbach 's Alpha值为0.95。研究数据采用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)软件进行分析。研究结果表明,教师在RBT教学中的准备程度总体均值较高。结果显示,学生在推理知识方面的平均得分为3.82 (SP = 0.57),在SBA技能方面的平均得分为3.92 (SP = 0.58)。调查结果给人的印象是,受访者具有较高的推理知识和PBS技能。研究还发现,学生在SBA技能方面的平均值高于推理知识方面。回归分析结果显示,这四个因素对教师准备的影响显著,达到40.4%。总之,本研究的结果给人的印象是,影响教师准备的因素在新课程的制定中是重要的。本研究为政策制定者和课程规划者提供了指导,特别是马来西亚教育部(KPM)在引入新科目时的教师准备方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Technical Education and Training
Journal of Technical Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: JTET will consider for publications original research articles, critical reviews as well as technical reports that can further our understanding of TVET issues and concerns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信