THE FACTORS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ADOPTION OF MALAYSIAN PRIVATE ENTITIES REPORTING STANDARDS (MPERS) FOR SMEs IN MALAYSIA

Emmanuel G. Kapizionis, Stephen Day
{"title":"THE FACTORS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ADOPTION OF MALAYSIAN PRIVATE ENTITIES REPORTING STANDARDS (MPERS) FOR SMEs IN MALAYSIA","authors":"Emmanuel G. Kapizionis, Stephen Day","doi":"10.46827/ejefr.v7i4.1567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to explore the factors that have influenced the adoption of Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standards (MPERS) in Malaysia since 2016, to explore the costs and benefits to Malaysian SMEs of adopting the MPERS, and also to explore challenges and expectations exploring the perception of 15 accounting professionals representing SMEs in Malaysia. Findings indicate that education and professional training are influential factors in the way participants perceive the MPERS but tensions between education and training did come to the fore in the interviews. Legal and tax factors are also influential. However, participants did not discuss the role of tax or legal factors relating to the implementation of the standard in any depth. Further, findings also indicate that cultural factors play a significant role equal to external economic factors, which heavily influenced the Malaysian standard setter to adopt MPERS. Participants suggested that the initial (short-term) costs for the adoption of the standard outweigh the benefits, but that over the long term, the benefits outweighed the costs of the adoption of the MPERS. The findings also suggest that adoption increased the reliability of financial information to users while adoption of the MPERS provides confidence to foreign investors by providing a comparable accounting framework with other countries, which was seen by participants as one of the most prominent macro effects. This thesis is the first to explore factors that drove the Malaysian authorities to adopt the MPERS and contribute to the existing body of accounting literature. We argue that this study’s findings might be used as a solid basis for other similar contexts in Southeast Asia with similar cultural characteristics to Malaysia.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>JEL</strong>: M10, M14, M20, M40, M41</p><p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src=\"/-counters-/soc/0011/a.php\" alt=\"Hit counter\" /></p>","PeriodicalId":491195,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Financial Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Financial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46827/ejefr.v7i4.1567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the factors that have influenced the adoption of Malaysian Private Entities Reporting Standards (MPERS) in Malaysia since 2016, to explore the costs and benefits to Malaysian SMEs of adopting the MPERS, and also to explore challenges and expectations exploring the perception of 15 accounting professionals representing SMEs in Malaysia. Findings indicate that education and professional training are influential factors in the way participants perceive the MPERS but tensions between education and training did come to the fore in the interviews. Legal and tax factors are also influential. However, participants did not discuss the role of tax or legal factors relating to the implementation of the standard in any depth. Further, findings also indicate that cultural factors play a significant role equal to external economic factors, which heavily influenced the Malaysian standard setter to adopt MPERS. Participants suggested that the initial (short-term) costs for the adoption of the standard outweigh the benefits, but that over the long term, the benefits outweighed the costs of the adoption of the MPERS. The findings also suggest that adoption increased the reliability of financial information to users while adoption of the MPERS provides confidence to foreign investors by providing a comparable accounting framework with other countries, which was seen by participants as one of the most prominent macro effects. This thesis is the first to explore factors that drove the Malaysian authorities to adopt the MPERS and contribute to the existing body of accounting literature. We argue that this study’s findings might be used as a solid basis for other similar contexts in Southeast Asia with similar cultural characteristics to Malaysia.

JEL: M10, M14, M20, M40, M41

Article visualizations:

Abstract Image

影响马来西亚中小型企业采用马来西亚私人实体报告标准(MPERS)的因素
本研究旨在探讨自2016年以来影响马来西亚采用马来西亚私人实体报告准则(MPERS)的因素,探讨采用MPERS对马来西亚中小企业的成本和收益,并探讨挑战和期望,探讨代表马来西亚中小企业的15名会计专业人员的看法。调查结果表明,教育和专业培训是影响参与者感知MPERS方式的因素,但教育和培训之间的紧张关系确实在访谈中脱颖而出。法律和税收因素也有影响。但是,与会者没有深入讨论与执行标准有关的税收或法律因素的作用。此外,研究结果还表明,文化因素与外部经济因素一样发挥着重要作用,这在很大程度上影响了马来西亚标准制定者采用MPERS。与会者认为,采用该标准的初期(短期)成本大于收益,但从长期来看,收益大于采用MPERS的成本。调查结果还表明,采用MPERS增加了财务信息对使用者的可靠性,而采用MPERS通过提供与其他国家可比较的会计框架,为外国投资者提供了信心,参与者认为这是最突出的宏观影响之一。本文首先探讨了促使马来西亚当局采用MPERS的因素,并为现有的会计文献做出了贡献。我们认为,这项研究的发现可以作为东南亚其他具有与马来西亚相似文化特征的类似背景的坚实基础。</ < ><& lt; / strong> & lt; / p> & lt; p> & lt; strong> JEL< / strong>: M10, M14, M20, M40、M41< / p> & lt; p>& lt; / p> & lt; p> & lt; strong>文章可视化:</strong></p>< < <img src="/-counters-/soc/0011/a.p php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信