Investigating students’ perceptions of dificulty in argumentative writing: a study in gender perspective

Q2 Social Sciences
Juhana Juhana, Hanna Sundari, Widya Rizky Pratiwi
{"title":"Investigating students’ perceptions of dificulty in argumentative writing: a study in gender perspective","authors":"Juhana Juhana, Hanna Sundari, Widya Rizky Pratiwi","doi":"10.21831/cp.v42i3.59407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing difficulty and constraints have gained much attention and research locally and overseas. However, the writing difficulty EFL male and female writers perceived in developing argumentative essays was still little in literature. To fill the void, this concurrent mixed method study aimed to scrutinize the variation and frequency and explore the perceptions of being argumentative writers among 113 EFL university students in Jakarta, Indonesia. Through a survey and the framework of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), online questionnaires were distributed, and the interviews were conducted concurrently. The findings illustrated that EFL male and female writers experience similar major difficulties, including argumentative text genre, language use, difficulty in source/reference, problems in the cognitive process, and other technical challenges. Further, to be argumentative writers, female writers tend to feel various combinations of feelings and apply more learning strategies. In contrast, male writers express more on the cognitive process of essay completion. However, either male or female writers become more aware of their weaknesses in the English language, such as reading skills.","PeriodicalId":52186,"journal":{"name":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.59407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing difficulty and constraints have gained much attention and research locally and overseas. However, the writing difficulty EFL male and female writers perceived in developing argumentative essays was still little in literature. To fill the void, this concurrent mixed method study aimed to scrutinize the variation and frequency and explore the perceptions of being argumentative writers among 113 EFL university students in Jakarta, Indonesia. Through a survey and the framework of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), online questionnaires were distributed, and the interviews were conducted concurrently. The findings illustrated that EFL male and female writers experience similar major difficulties, including argumentative text genre, language use, difficulty in source/reference, problems in the cognitive process, and other technical challenges. Further, to be argumentative writers, female writers tend to feel various combinations of feelings and apply more learning strategies. In contrast, male writers express more on the cognitive process of essay completion. However, either male or female writers become more aware of their weaknesses in the English language, such as reading skills.
调查学生对议论文写作难度的认知:性别视角的研究
写作困难和制约因素在国内外引起了广泛的关注和研究。然而,英语男女作家在发展议论文时所感受到的写作困难在文学中仍然很少。为了填补这一空白,本研究旨在观察印度尼西亚雅加达113名英语大学学生议论文写作的变化和频率,并探讨他们对议论文写作的看法。通过调查和解释现象学分析(IPA)框架,发放在线问卷,同时进行访谈。研究结果表明,英语男性和女性作者在议论文体裁、语言使用、来源/参考困难、认知过程问题和其他技术挑战等方面遇到了相似的主要困难。此外,作为议论文作者,女性作家倾向于感受各种各样的情感组合,并使用更多的学习策略。相比之下,男性作家更多地表达了对论文完成的认知过程。然而,无论是男性还是女性作家都越来越意识到自己在英语语言上的弱点,比如阅读技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cakrawala Pendidikan
Cakrawala Pendidikan Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信