What is the effect of learning models and interests on study results?

Q2 Social Sciences
Suratno Suratno, Rahmat Murboyono, Muazza Muazza, Devi Guspita
{"title":"What is the effect of learning models and interests on study results?","authors":"Suratno Suratno, Rahmat Murboyono, Muazza Muazza, Devi Guspita","doi":"10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between the learning model (NHT and STAD) and student interest on learning outcomes . This study uses a mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory. Sequential explanatory is a research where the initial data collection is quantitative which is then followed by qualitative data. The data collection instrument is in the form of a response questionnaire for the STAD and NHT learning models with 18 statements , student interest questionnaires of 1 1 statement, and learning outcomes test sheets containing 7 questions. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics to find the average value and using inferential statistics in the form of multiple regression test and ANOVA test to see quantitative data, while for qualitative data using Miles Huberman, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusions. This study uses 327 students of SMK 1 and SMK 4 in Jambi City by using a total sampling technique, namely the entire population is used as the research sample . Then interviewed 20 students who were willing to conduct interviews. The results of this study indicate that Student responses to the STAD learning model have a good category, which is 60.2% (197 of 327) and student responses to the NHT learning model of teacher pedagogic competence also have a low category. good that is equal to 58.7% (192 of 225). Student interest in learning also has a good category, which is 60.9% (199 out of 327. And there is a significant influence between learning models, interests and student learning outcomes with the determination coefficient value is (R2) 0.729 . This means the contribution of the model learning and student interest in student learning outcomes by 72.9 %, while the remaining 27.1 % is influenced by other variables.","PeriodicalId":52186,"journal":{"name":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between the learning model (NHT and STAD) and student interest on learning outcomes . This study uses a mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory. Sequential explanatory is a research where the initial data collection is quantitative which is then followed by qualitative data. The data collection instrument is in the form of a response questionnaire for the STAD and NHT learning models with 18 statements , student interest questionnaires of 1 1 statement, and learning outcomes test sheets containing 7 questions. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics to find the average value and using inferential statistics in the form of multiple regression test and ANOVA test to see quantitative data, while for qualitative data using Miles Huberman, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusions. This study uses 327 students of SMK 1 and SMK 4 in Jambi City by using a total sampling technique, namely the entire population is used as the research sample . Then interviewed 20 students who were willing to conduct interviews. The results of this study indicate that Student responses to the STAD learning model have a good category, which is 60.2% (197 of 327) and student responses to the NHT learning model of teacher pedagogic competence also have a low category. good that is equal to 58.7% (192 of 225). Student interest in learning also has a good category, which is 60.9% (199 out of 327. And there is a significant influence between learning models, interests and student learning outcomes with the determination coefficient value is (R2) 0.729 . This means the contribution of the model learning and student interest in student learning outcomes by 72.9 %, while the remaining 27.1 % is influenced by other variables.
学习模式和兴趣对学习结果有什么影响?
本研究旨在确定学习模式(NHT和STAD)和学生兴趣对学习成果是否有显著影响。本研究采用顺序解释的混合方法。顺序解释是一种研究,其中最初的数据收集是定量的,然后是定性的数据。数据收集工具为STAD和NHT两种学习模式的18题回答问卷、11题学生兴趣问卷和7题学习成果测试表。对数据进行描述性统计,求平均值;对定量数据采用多元回归检验和方差分析检验的推理统计;对定性数据采用Miles Huberman,即数据约简、数据显示、结论。本研究以占碑市smk1和smk4的327名学生为研究对象,采用全抽样方法,即以全体人口为研究样本。然后采访了20名愿意进行采访的学生。本研究结果表明,学生对STAD学习模式的反应类别较好,占60.2%(327人中的197人),学生对教师教学能力的NHT学习模式的反应类别也较低。好,等于58.7%(225个中的192个)。学生的学习兴趣类别也很好,为60.9%(327人中有199人)。学习模式、兴趣对学生学习成果有显著影响,决定系数值为(R2) 0.729。这意味着模式学习和学生兴趣对学生学习成果的贡献为72.9%,而剩余的27.1%受到其他变量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cakrawala Pendidikan
Cakrawala Pendidikan Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信