Constitutive Features of Administrative Acts: Criticism and Analysis

Roman Melnyk
{"title":"Constitutive Features of Administrative Acts: Criticism and Analysis","authors":"Roman Melnyk","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.286411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the topic has been determined by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». The article is aimed at analyzing the approaches on understanding the features of an administrative act existing in Ukrainian legal doctrine and formulating recommendations oriented on building their universal system. Various methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others constitute the research methodology. It makes it possible to systematically and consistently solve scientific problems, to study and compare the standpoints of scholars, the provisions of legal acts of the relevant countries, caselaw and to formulate the author’s conclusions. A number of systematic problems related to the incorrect understanding of the essence and features of administrative acts has been revealed in the research process. This situation, according to the author’s opinion, is largely related to the imperfection of legal definition of an administrative act, which was enshrined in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Further analysis of the works of Ukrainian authors has demonstrated that in order to formulate relevant scientific provisions they in the vast majority use the results of Soviet authors. According to the author, such an approach is wrong; it blocks the development of modern, practically oriented concepts and conclusions. The author of the article has separately emphasized the fact that the features of an administrative act perform very important practical function. They help to solve comprehensive objectives primarily arising at the legal enforcement level. The author provides relevant detailed explanations on this matter. The article’s center of attention is the detailed presentation of the features of an administrative act. While performing this objective, the author has widely used the achievements of Western European authors, as well as refers to certain decisions of the judicial power to demonstrate the validity of the formulated conclusions and recommendations. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to a sound conclusion that an administrative act should be characterized by the following features: 1) it represents a decision; 2) it is taken by an administrative agency; 3) it is oriented on the application / implementation of the norms of public (administrative) law; 4) it causes legal consequences in the form of establishing the rights or obligations for its addressee (regulatory nature); 5) it has a concrete and individual character; 6) it is characterized by an external orientation of the action. The conducted research allowed to draw the following conclusion:the features of an administrative act play a constitutive role by helping to solve various theoretical and practical problems. The features of an administrative act are universal in nature. It means that they do not depend (should not depend) on the national peculiarities of legal regulation and ideas about it. Ukrainian authors must be extremely responsible while formulating their own conclusions in regard to those categories and provisions having a supranational nature.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.286411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the topic has been determined by the entry into force of the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». The article is aimed at analyzing the approaches on understanding the features of an administrative act existing in Ukrainian legal doctrine and formulating recommendations oriented on building their universal system. Various methods of scientific cognition, including comparative and legal, systematic and structural, analysis, synthesis, and others constitute the research methodology. It makes it possible to systematically and consistently solve scientific problems, to study and compare the standpoints of scholars, the provisions of legal acts of the relevant countries, caselaw and to formulate the author’s conclusions. A number of systematic problems related to the incorrect understanding of the essence and features of administrative acts has been revealed in the research process. This situation, according to the author’s opinion, is largely related to the imperfection of legal definition of an administrative act, which was enshrined in the Law of Ukraine «On Administrative Procedure». Further analysis of the works of Ukrainian authors has demonstrated that in order to formulate relevant scientific provisions they in the vast majority use the results of Soviet authors. According to the author, such an approach is wrong; it blocks the development of modern, practically oriented concepts and conclusions. The author of the article has separately emphasized the fact that the features of an administrative act perform very important practical function. They help to solve comprehensive objectives primarily arising at the legal enforcement level. The author provides relevant detailed explanations on this matter. The article’s center of attention is the detailed presentation of the features of an administrative act. While performing this objective, the author has widely used the achievements of Western European authors, as well as refers to certain decisions of the judicial power to demonstrate the validity of the formulated conclusions and recommendations. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to a sound conclusion that an administrative act should be characterized by the following features: 1) it represents a decision; 2) it is taken by an administrative agency; 3) it is oriented on the application / implementation of the norms of public (administrative) law; 4) it causes legal consequences in the form of establishing the rights or obligations for its addressee (regulatory nature); 5) it has a concrete and individual character; 6) it is characterized by an external orientation of the action. The conducted research allowed to draw the following conclusion:the features of an administrative act play a constitutive role by helping to solve various theoretical and practical problems. The features of an administrative act are universal in nature. It means that they do not depend (should not depend) on the national peculiarities of legal regulation and ideas about it. Ukrainian authors must be extremely responsible while formulating their own conclusions in regard to those categories and provisions having a supranational nature.
行政行为的构成特征:批判与分析
《乌克兰行政程序法》的生效确定了本专题的相关性。本文旨在分析乌克兰法律学说中存在的理解行政行为特征的方法,并针对建立其普遍制度提出建议。科学认知的各种方法,包括比较与法律、系统与结构、分析、综合等,构成了研究方法论。它可以系统地、连贯地解决科学问题,研究和比较学者的观点、有关国家法律行为的规定、判例法,并形成作者的结论。在研究过程中,暴露出对行政行为的本质和特征认识不正确的一系列制度问题。提交人认为,这种情况在很大程度上与乌克兰《行政程序法》所规定的行政行为的法律定义不完善有关。对乌克兰作者作品的进一步分析表明,为了制定有关的科学规定,他们绝大多数都使用了苏联作者的成果。在作者看来,这种做法是错误的;它阻碍了现代的、面向实践的概念和结论的发展。本文作者分别强调了行政行为的特征具有非常重要的实践功能。它们有助于解决主要在执法层面产生的综合目标。作者对这一问题进行了相关的详细说明。本文的重点是详细介绍行政行为的特征。在实现这一目标的同时,作者广泛引用了西欧作者的成就,并引用了司法权的某些决定来证明所制定的结论和建议的有效性。通过对行政行为的研究,笔者得出了行政行为应当具有以下特征的结论:1)行政行为是一种决定;(二)行政机关采取的;3)以公共(行政)法规范的适用/实施为导向;4)以确立收件人权利或义务的形式造成法律后果(监管性质);(5)具体的、个别的;6)它的特点是动作的外部定向。通过研究可以得出以下结论:行政行为的特征通过帮助解决各种理论和实践问题来发挥构成作用。行政行为的特征具有普遍性。这意味着它们不依赖于(不应该依赖于)各国法律规定的特殊性和有关法律规定的观念。乌克兰作者在就这些具有超国家性质的类别和规定作出自己的结论时必须极为负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信