Exploring the Factors Influencing Nurses’ Decisions in Applying a Mental Health Triage Scale: A Systematic Review

Faisal Alnakhilan, Shrouq Alqhtani, Ahmed Hakami, Sultan Alzahrani, Khalid Alharbi, Awatif Alqhtani
{"title":"Exploring the Factors Influencing Nurses’ Decisions in Applying a Mental Health Triage Scale: A Systematic Review","authors":"Faisal Alnakhilan, Shrouq Alqhtani, Ahmed Hakami, Sultan Alzahrani, Khalid Alharbi, Awatif Alqhtani","doi":"10.5539/gjhs.v15n10p73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise evidence regarding ED nurses’ decision-making when applying a mental health triage scale. The review sought to answer the question: What factors influence ED nurses’ decisions and decision-making process in applying a mental health triage scale?
 
 The views, attitudes and experiences of mental health triage nurses performing triages for patients with mental health presentations in emergency department settings were examined in a systematic review of published and peer-reviewed qualitative research articles. CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and EMBASE were used to find published works from 2013 to 2022. After reading the title and abstract, the whole text of relevant research was obtained. The results of the included papers were analysed using the thematic content and narrative analysis approach, and critical appraisal of the quality of included articles was carried out using CASP. Sub-themes and themes were created by collapsing emerging patterns and codes.
 
 A total of eight full-text studies were included in the review. All the eight articles were qualitative studies conducted in six different countries and published in peer-reviewed journals. The total sample in the included articles consisted of 135 emergency department triage nurses with semi-structured and focus groups used in data collection. The methodological quality of the articles varied, with scores ranging from 16 to 18 out of 20. Three main themes emerged from the systematic review. From the ED triage nurses’ points of view, factors affecting triage decision making for patients with mental health presentations were “nurse-related”, “workplace-related”, and “patient-related”.
 
 This is the first systematic review summarising the evidence of the factors affecting ED triage nurses’ decision-making involving patients with mental health presentations. The findings suggest that the nurse as an individual (personally and professional), the workplace (social, structural and architectural environment), and the patient as an individual (safety, risk, acuity and behaviour) affect the quality of nursing decision-making in applying mental health triage scales. Ongoing review of the literature in this area is important to provide further evidence to inform nursing policy, practice, education and further research.","PeriodicalId":12573,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Health Science","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v15n10p73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise evidence regarding ED nurses’ decision-making when applying a mental health triage scale. The review sought to answer the question: What factors influence ED nurses’ decisions and decision-making process in applying a mental health triage scale? The views, attitudes and experiences of mental health triage nurses performing triages for patients with mental health presentations in emergency department settings were examined in a systematic review of published and peer-reviewed qualitative research articles. CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and EMBASE were used to find published works from 2013 to 2022. After reading the title and abstract, the whole text of relevant research was obtained. The results of the included papers were analysed using the thematic content and narrative analysis approach, and critical appraisal of the quality of included articles was carried out using CASP. Sub-themes and themes were created by collapsing emerging patterns and codes. A total of eight full-text studies were included in the review. All the eight articles were qualitative studies conducted in six different countries and published in peer-reviewed journals. The total sample in the included articles consisted of 135 emergency department triage nurses with semi-structured and focus groups used in data collection. The methodological quality of the articles varied, with scores ranging from 16 to 18 out of 20. Three main themes emerged from the systematic review. From the ED triage nurses’ points of view, factors affecting triage decision making for patients with mental health presentations were “nurse-related”, “workplace-related”, and “patient-related”. This is the first systematic review summarising the evidence of the factors affecting ED triage nurses’ decision-making involving patients with mental health presentations. The findings suggest that the nurse as an individual (personally and professional), the workplace (social, structural and architectural environment), and the patient as an individual (safety, risk, acuity and behaviour) affect the quality of nursing decision-making in applying mental health triage scales. Ongoing review of the literature in this area is important to provide further evidence to inform nursing policy, practice, education and further research.
探讨影响护士使用心理健康分诊量表决策的因素:系统回顾
本系统综述的目的是综合有关急诊科护士的证据。使用心理健康分诊量表时的决策。这篇综述试图回答以下问题:哪些因素影响急诊科护士的行为?应用心理健康分诊量表的决策和决策过程? & # x0D;在对已发表和同行评议的定性研究文章的系统回顾中,对急诊科设置的精神健康表现患者进行分诊的心理健康分诊护士的观点、态度和经验进行了研究。使用CINAHL、PsycINFO、PubMed和EMBASE检索2013 - 2022年的已发表作品。在阅读了题目和摘要后,得到了相关研究的全文。使用主题内容和叙事分析方法对纳入论文的结果进行分析,并使用CASP对纳入文章的质量进行批判性评估。子主题和主题是通过折叠新出现的图案和代码创建的。 & # x0D;本综述共纳入了8项全文研究。这八篇文章都是在六个不同的国家进行的定性研究,发表在同行评议的期刊上。纳入文章的总样本包括135名急诊科分诊护士,数据收集采用半结构化和焦点小组。这些文章的方法论质量各不相同,得分在16到18分(满分20分)之间。系统评价中出现了三个主要主题。从急诊科分诊护士& &;从观点来看,影响心理健康患者分诊决策的因素是“护士相关”工作场所相关”和“患者相关” & # x0D;这是第一个系统综述,总结了影响急诊科分诊护士的因素的证据。涉及精神疾病患者的决策。研究结果表明,护士作为个体(个人和专业),工作场所(社会,结构和建筑环境),以及患者作为个体(安全,风险,敏锐度和行为)影响应用心理健康分诊量表的护理决策质量。正在进行的文献回顾在这一领域是重要的,以提供进一步的证据,告知护理政策,实践,教育和进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信