Teacher Education to Integrate Computational Thinking into Elementary Science: A Design-Based Research Study

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Heather Killen, Merijke Coenraad, Virginia Byrne, Lautaro Cabrera, Kelly Mills, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Jandelyn D. Plane
{"title":"Teacher Education to Integrate Computational Thinking into Elementary Science: A Design-Based Research Study","authors":"Heather Killen, Merijke Coenraad, Virginia Byrne, Lautaro Cabrera, Kelly Mills, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Jandelyn D. Plane","doi":"10.1145/3618115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational thinking (CT) is playing an increasingly relevant role within disciplinary teaching in elementary school, particularly in science. However, many teachers are unfamiliar with CT, either because their education occurred before the popularization of CT or because CT instruction was not included in their pre-service coursework. For these teachers, CT professional development (PD) becomes a primary mechanism to close their CT knowledge gap. While CT PD has demonstrated success at increasing teacher's CT understanding, researchers have reported varied outcomes in supporting teachers to write CT-integrated lesson plans. To explore how we might support teachers to integrate CT into elementary science, we employed design-based research (DBR) in a dual-track design of in-class CT instruction for pre-service undergraduates within an elementary science methods class paired with a collaborative, multi-month PD opportunity for pre- and in-service teachers. In this article, we reflect on our 5-year period of DBR and present our design insights and implications for CT instruction and curriculum design from each iteration. Our findings on best practices will inform both teacher educators and PD providers within CT education. Our work will also be of interest to researchers considering DBR for technology-based educational projects.","PeriodicalId":48764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","volume":" 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3618115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) is playing an increasingly relevant role within disciplinary teaching in elementary school, particularly in science. However, many teachers are unfamiliar with CT, either because their education occurred before the popularization of CT or because CT instruction was not included in their pre-service coursework. For these teachers, CT professional development (PD) becomes a primary mechanism to close their CT knowledge gap. While CT PD has demonstrated success at increasing teacher's CT understanding, researchers have reported varied outcomes in supporting teachers to write CT-integrated lesson plans. To explore how we might support teachers to integrate CT into elementary science, we employed design-based research (DBR) in a dual-track design of in-class CT instruction for pre-service undergraduates within an elementary science methods class paired with a collaborative, multi-month PD opportunity for pre- and in-service teachers. In this article, we reflect on our 5-year period of DBR and present our design insights and implications for CT instruction and curriculum design from each iteration. Our findings on best practices will inform both teacher educators and PD providers within CT education. Our work will also be of interest to researchers considering DBR for technology-based educational projects.
将计算思维融入基础科学的教师教育:基于设计的研究性研究
计算思维在小学学科教学,尤其是科学教学中发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,许多教师对CT并不熟悉,要么是因为他们的教育时间在CT普及之前,要么是因为CT教学没有纳入他们的职前课程。对于这些教师来说,CT专业发展(PD)成为他们弥补CT知识差距的主要机制。虽然CT PD在提高教师对CT的理解方面取得了成功,但研究人员报告了支持教师编写CT综合教案的不同结果。为了探索如何支持教师将CT整合到基础科学中,我们采用了基于设计的研究(DBR),在基础科学方法课程中对职前本科生进行课堂CT教学的双轨设计,并为职前和在职教师提供了为期数月的合作PD机会。在本文中,我们回顾了我们5年的DBR,并从每次迭代中提出了我们对CT教学和课程设计的设计见解和启示。我们关于最佳实践的发现将为CT教育中的教师教育者和PD提供者提供信息。我们的工作也会引起考虑将DBR用于基于技术的教育项目的研究人员的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (formerly named JERIC, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing) covers diverse aspects of computing education: traditional computer science, computer engineering, information technology, and informatics; emerging aspects of computing; and applications of computing to other disciplines. The common characteristics shared by these papers are a scholarly approach to teaching and learning, a broad appeal to educational practitioners, and a clear connection to student learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信