Everyday security and the newspaper obituary: Reproducing and contesting terrorism discourse

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Lee Jarvis, Andrew Whiting
{"title":"Everyday security and the newspaper obituary: Reproducing and contesting terrorism discourse","authors":"Lee Jarvis, Andrew Whiting","doi":"10.1177/09670106231201243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the obituary as an important, yet neglected, site of everyday security discourse. Through an original analysis of 86 published obituaries of 11 prominent ‘terrorists’, we offer three arguments. First, obituaries play an important constitutive role in shaping public understanding of terrorism and terrorists. Second, in so doing, terrorist obituaries frequently draw upon and reproduce established constructions of terrorism. Especially important here, we argue, are claims associated with the influential, yet heavily contested, ‘new terrorism’ thesis that posits profound transformations in the motives, organization and violences of terrorist groups from the late 20th century onwards. Third, notwithstanding the above, the (terrorist) obituary also offers important resources for nuancing and problematizing dominant constructions – such as of ‘new terrorism’ – in part because of the opportunity for sociopolitical critique afforded by this mnemonic genre. In making these arguments, the article therefore offers new empirical and conceptual insight into the obituary as a genre of everyday security knowledge, and into the mobility and resilience of established security discourses.","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":" 39","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106231201243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the obituary as an important, yet neglected, site of everyday security discourse. Through an original analysis of 86 published obituaries of 11 prominent ‘terrorists’, we offer three arguments. First, obituaries play an important constitutive role in shaping public understanding of terrorism and terrorists. Second, in so doing, terrorist obituaries frequently draw upon and reproduce established constructions of terrorism. Especially important here, we argue, are claims associated with the influential, yet heavily contested, ‘new terrorism’ thesis that posits profound transformations in the motives, organization and violences of terrorist groups from the late 20th century onwards. Third, notwithstanding the above, the (terrorist) obituary also offers important resources for nuancing and problematizing dominant constructions – such as of ‘new terrorism’ – in part because of the opportunity for sociopolitical critique afforded by this mnemonic genre. In making these arguments, the article therefore offers new empirical and conceptual insight into the obituary as a genre of everyday security knowledge, and into the mobility and resilience of established security discourses.
日常安全与报纸讣告:恐怖主义话语的再现与对抗
这篇文章探讨了讣告作为一个重要的,但被忽视的,网站的日常安全论述。通过对11名著名“恐怖分子”86份已发表讣告的原始分析,我们提出了三个论点。首先,讣告在塑造公众对恐怖主义和恐怖分子的理解方面发挥着重要的基础性作用。其次,在这样做的过程中,恐怖分子的讣告经常利用和复制恐怖主义的既定结构。我们认为,这里特别重要的是,与有影响力但备受争议的“新恐怖主义”理论相关的主张,该理论认为,自20世纪末以来,恐怖组织的动机、组织和暴力发生了深刻的变化。第三,尽管如上所述,(恐怖分子)讣告也为细微差别和问题化主导结构提供了重要的资源——比如“新恐怖主义”——部分原因是这种记忆体裁提供了社会政治批判的机会。因此,在提出这些论点时,文章提供了新的经验和概念洞察力,将讣告作为日常安全知识的一种类型,并进入已建立的安全话语的流动性和弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信