Development and feasibility of an educational module on medication reconciliation for hospital pharmacists in the United Arab Emirates: a pilot study

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alaa Farajallah, Hadzliana Zainal, Subish Palaian
{"title":"Development and feasibility of an educational module on medication reconciliation for hospital pharmacists in the United Arab Emirates: a pilot study","authors":"Alaa Farajallah, Hadzliana Zainal, Subish Palaian","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The practice of medication reconciliation by pharmacists is minimal in United Arab Emirates hospitals. Objectives To design an educational module for pharmacists on medication reconciliation and assess its feasibility. Methods The study consisted of three parts: A pre-educational module survey using a validated knowledge, perception, practice, and barriers questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), delivery of the educational module, and participants’ feedback. An educational module (general introduction to medication reconciliation, what is medication reconciliation, how to do medication reconciliation, and practicing medication reconciliation) was developed based on Miller’s pyramid and validated by three experts and pilot-tested. The knowledge and perceptions of pharmacists were evaluated by comparing pre-post educational module survey results. Results The module influenced the participants’ knowledge and perception of medication reconciliation. All of the participants gave ‘positive’ feedback on the intervention and the methodology applied, and they agreed on the need for training and workshops related to medication reconciliation. In addition, all ‘agreed’ that a lack of knowledge about medication reconciliation is the biggest barrier to medication reconciliation practices. The results further illustrated that all pharmacists had a ‘positive’ experience and ‘agreed strongly’ on understanding the majority of the content. Conclusion This study was successful in answering the research question by enrolling suitable participants, managing the timeline, and possessing resources for completing the study and hence considered feasible. This module can be utilized in continuous professional development programs to improve pharmacists’ knowledge, perceptions, and practice toward the medication reconciliation process aiming to reduce drug therapy-related problems in hospital settings.","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The practice of medication reconciliation by pharmacists is minimal in United Arab Emirates hospitals. Objectives To design an educational module for pharmacists on medication reconciliation and assess its feasibility. Methods The study consisted of three parts: A pre-educational module survey using a validated knowledge, perception, practice, and barriers questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), delivery of the educational module, and participants’ feedback. An educational module (general introduction to medication reconciliation, what is medication reconciliation, how to do medication reconciliation, and practicing medication reconciliation) was developed based on Miller’s pyramid and validated by three experts and pilot-tested. The knowledge and perceptions of pharmacists were evaluated by comparing pre-post educational module survey results. Results The module influenced the participants’ knowledge and perception of medication reconciliation. All of the participants gave ‘positive’ feedback on the intervention and the methodology applied, and they agreed on the need for training and workshops related to medication reconciliation. In addition, all ‘agreed’ that a lack of knowledge about medication reconciliation is the biggest barrier to medication reconciliation practices. The results further illustrated that all pharmacists had a ‘positive’ experience and ‘agreed strongly’ on understanding the majority of the content. Conclusion This study was successful in answering the research question by enrolling suitable participants, managing the timeline, and possessing resources for completing the study and hence considered feasible. This module can be utilized in continuous professional development programs to improve pharmacists’ knowledge, perceptions, and practice toward the medication reconciliation process aiming to reduce drug therapy-related problems in hospital settings.
阿拉伯联合酋长国医院药剂师药物和解教育模块的开发和可行性:一项试点研究
背景在阿联酋的医院中,药剂师进行药物调解的实践很少。目的设计药师用药和解教育模块,并对其可行性进行评估。方法采用经验证的知识、感知、实践和障碍问卷(Cronbach ' s α = 0.78)进行学前教育模块调查,进行教育模块的发放,并听取参与者的反馈。以米勒金字塔理论为基础,开发了一个教育模块(药物和解概论、什么是药物和解、如何进行药物和解、实践药物和解),并经过三位专家的验证和试点测试。通过前后教育模块调查结果的比较,评价药师的知识和认知。结果该模块影响了被试对药物和解的认知和感知。所有的参与者都对干预措施和应用的方法给出了“积极”的反馈,他们同意需要进行与药物和解相关的培训和讲习班。此外,所有人都“同意”缺乏关于药物和解的知识是药物和解实践的最大障碍。结果进一步表明,所有药剂师都有一个“积极”的经验,并“强烈同意”理解大部分内容。本研究通过招募合适的参与者,管理时间线,拥有完成研究的资源,成功地回答了研究问题,因此认为是可行的。该模块可用于持续的专业发展计划,以提高药剂师的知识,观念和实践的药物调解过程,旨在减少在医院设置药物治疗相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信