Comparison between biofeedback Acapella and biofeedback flutter devices in COPD: A new way to improve airway clearance

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Aneesha Dhanraj Menezes, K. Rekha, B. Sanjeev Rai
{"title":"Comparison between biofeedback Acapella and biofeedback flutter devices in COPD: A new way to improve airway clearance","authors":"Aneesha Dhanraj Menezes, K. Rekha, B. Sanjeev Rai","doi":"10.51248/.v43i5.3650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: In recent years, biofeedback systems have been integrated into a variety of devices. Biofeedback system is the process of gaining awareness of one's physiological functions by an apparatus which provides participants feedback of their performance. Respiratory training with a biofeedback system provides the correct breathing pattern, reduces respiratory rate and tension, enhances respiratory function, improves gaseous exchange, improves ventilation and perfusion mismatch. Therefore, it reduces sympathetic nervous system activity by clearing secretions. As clearing the mucous from the airways is the initial stage of respiratory rehabilitation, this study sought to implement a biofeedback system in an Acapella and flutter device and compared the effectiveness of both the positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices (Acapella and Flutter) with biofeedback on lung functions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
 
 Materials and Methods: 30 patients were assigned randomly to the acapella group or the flutter group with 15 patients in each group. The Acapella biofeedback group used the Biofeedback Acapella device for 15-20 minutes per day for five days, while the Flutter biofeedback group used the Biofeedback Flutter device simultaneously.
 
 Results: The biofeedback acapella group and the biofeedback flutter group showed significantly higher increases in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and oxygen saturation (SpO2). There was no significant difference between the groups. In addition, there was a significant difference in sputum weight, within both the groups reducing significant amounts of sputum and improving symptoms.
 
 Conclusion: These results suggest that both Biofeedback Acapella device and the Biofeedback Flutter device help in improving lung function and oxygen saturation in COPD patients. Further scientific studies are needed to be performed to confirm the results and to determine the optimal durations and frequencies used in these devices. We also recommend further improvement and development of airway clearance devices.","PeriodicalId":35655,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine (India)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine (India)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i5.3650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: In recent years, biofeedback systems have been integrated into a variety of devices. Biofeedback system is the process of gaining awareness of one's physiological functions by an apparatus which provides participants feedback of their performance. Respiratory training with a biofeedback system provides the correct breathing pattern, reduces respiratory rate and tension, enhances respiratory function, improves gaseous exchange, improves ventilation and perfusion mismatch. Therefore, it reduces sympathetic nervous system activity by clearing secretions. As clearing the mucous from the airways is the initial stage of respiratory rehabilitation, this study sought to implement a biofeedback system in an Acapella and flutter device and compared the effectiveness of both the positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices (Acapella and Flutter) with biofeedback on lung functions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Materials and Methods: 30 patients were assigned randomly to the acapella group or the flutter group with 15 patients in each group. The Acapella biofeedback group used the Biofeedback Acapella device for 15-20 minutes per day for five days, while the Flutter biofeedback group used the Biofeedback Flutter device simultaneously. Results: The biofeedback acapella group and the biofeedback flutter group showed significantly higher increases in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and oxygen saturation (SpO2). There was no significant difference between the groups. In addition, there was a significant difference in sputum weight, within both the groups reducing significant amounts of sputum and improving symptoms. Conclusion: These results suggest that both Biofeedback Acapella device and the Biofeedback Flutter device help in improving lung function and oxygen saturation in COPD patients. Further scientific studies are needed to be performed to confirm the results and to determine the optimal durations and frequencies used in these devices. We also recommend further improvement and development of airway clearance devices.
生物反馈Acapella与生物反馈扑动装置在COPD治疗中的比较:一种改善气道清除率的新方法
简介和目的:近年来,生物反馈系统已被集成到各种设备中。生物反馈系统是通过向参与者提供他们的表现反馈的装置获得对一个人的生理功能的意识的过程。使用生物反馈系统进行呼吸训练,提供正确的呼吸模式,降低呼吸频率和紧张程度,增强呼吸功能,改善气体交换,改善通气和灌注不匹配。因此,它通过清除分泌物来减少交感神经系统的活动。由于清除气道粘液是呼吸康复的初始阶段,本研究试图在Acapella和flutter装置中实施生物反馈系统,并比较呼气正压(PEP)装置(Acapella和flutter)与生物反馈对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能的影响。 & # x0D;材料与方法:30例患者随机分为无瓣组和扑动组,每组15例。Acapella生物反馈组每天使用biofeedback Acapella装置15-20分钟,连续5天,Flutter生物反馈组同时使用biofeedback Flutter装置。 & # x0D;结果:生物反馈无ella组和生物反馈扑动组用力肺活量(FVC)、每秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)均显著升高。两组间无显著差异。此外,两组患者的痰质量也有显著差异,痰量明显减少,症状明显改善。 & # x0D;结论:生物反馈Acapella装置和生物反馈扑动装置均有助于改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺功能和氧饱和度。需要进行进一步的科学研究来确认结果,并确定这些设备中使用的最佳持续时间和频率。我们还建议进一步改进和发展气道清除装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicine (India)
Biomedicine (India) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信