Reverse Wafer Procedure

Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775819
Ismail Bulent Ozcelik, Ali Cavit, Aydin Yuceturk
{"title":"Reverse Wafer Procedure","authors":"Ismail Bulent Ozcelik, Ali Cavit, Aydin Yuceturk","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose This study aimed to present the results of an alternative technique for treating ulnar impaction syndrome, the “reverse wafer procedure,” and assess the mid-term clinical outcomes of patients treated with this technique. Methods A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 14 patients who underwent the reverse wafer procedure for ulnar impaction syndrome between 2013 and 2020. The inclusion criteria for the study were persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain, even after a minimum of 3 months of nonoperative treatment, the presence of a chondral lesion on the lunate, and an intact triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) based on arthroscopic evaluation. Postoperative clinical and subjective functional outcomes were assessed using measures such as wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, the Turkish version of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (Quick DASH), and pain levels measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) and were compared with preoperative values. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated postoperatively. Results The mean follow-up period was 42.2 months (range: 24–68 months). Postoperatively, none of the patients experienced any restriction in ROM. Grip measurements significantly increased after the surgery (p = 0.003). Preoperatively, the patients had a grip strength of 41.14 kg (range 28–48 kg), which improved to 44 kg (range 30–52 kg) postoperatively. Postoperative VAS values and QDASH scores significantly decreased compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). The mean VAS score decreased from 6.1 (range 4–8) preoperatively to 0.9 (range 0–5) postoperatively. The mean Quick DASH score decreased from 49.44 (range 25–68.3) preoperatively to 10.13 (range 3.3–36) postoperatively. When asked about their satisfaction with the operation, 13 out of 14 patients reported being highly satisfied with the results. Conclusions The reverse wafer procedure presents an alternative treatment option for ulnar impaction syndrome in cases where the TFCC is intact. The mid-term results of this described technique are promising. However, further comparative studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to support these findings. Level of Evidence IV Therapeutic.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to present the results of an alternative technique for treating ulnar impaction syndrome, the “reverse wafer procedure,” and assess the mid-term clinical outcomes of patients treated with this technique. Methods A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 14 patients who underwent the reverse wafer procedure for ulnar impaction syndrome between 2013 and 2020. The inclusion criteria for the study were persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain, even after a minimum of 3 months of nonoperative treatment, the presence of a chondral lesion on the lunate, and an intact triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) based on arthroscopic evaluation. Postoperative clinical and subjective functional outcomes were assessed using measures such as wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, the Turkish version of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (Quick DASH), and pain levels measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) and were compared with preoperative values. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated postoperatively. Results The mean follow-up period was 42.2 months (range: 24–68 months). Postoperatively, none of the patients experienced any restriction in ROM. Grip measurements significantly increased after the surgery (p = 0.003). Preoperatively, the patients had a grip strength of 41.14 kg (range 28–48 kg), which improved to 44 kg (range 30–52 kg) postoperatively. Postoperative VAS values and QDASH scores significantly decreased compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). The mean VAS score decreased from 6.1 (range 4–8) preoperatively to 0.9 (range 0–5) postoperatively. The mean Quick DASH score decreased from 49.44 (range 25–68.3) preoperatively to 10.13 (range 3.3–36) postoperatively. When asked about their satisfaction with the operation, 13 out of 14 patients reported being highly satisfied with the results. Conclusions The reverse wafer procedure presents an alternative treatment option for ulnar impaction syndrome in cases where the TFCC is intact. The mid-term results of this described technique are promising. However, further comparative studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to support these findings. Level of Evidence IV Therapeutic.
分享
查看原文
反晶圆工序
摘要目的本研究旨在介绍一种治疗尺嵌塞综合征的替代技术“反向晶圆手术”的结果,并评估采用该技术治疗的患者的中期临床结果。方法回顾性分析2013 ~ 2020年收治的14例尺侧嵌塞综合征患者的临床资料。该研究的纳入标准是持续的尺侧腕关节疼痛,即使在至少3个月的非手术治疗后,在月骨上存在软骨病变,以及基于关节镜评估的完整三角形纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)。术后临床和主观功能结果通过腕关节活动度(ROM)、握力、土耳其版手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷(quick DASH)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的疼痛水平进行评估,并与术前值进行比较。术后还对患者满意度进行了评估。结果平均随访时间为42.2个月(24 ~ 68个月)。术后,没有患者出现任何ROM限制。术后握力测量明显增加(p = 0.003)。术前握力为41.14 kg (28 ~ 48 kg),术后握力为44 kg (30 ~ 52 kg)。术后VAS评分和QDASH评分较术前显著降低(p <0.001, p = 0.001)。平均VAS评分从术前的6.1(范围4-8)下降到术后的0.9(范围0-5)。平均Quick DASH评分由术前49.44分(范围25-68.3)降至术后10.13分(范围3.3-36)。当被问及对手术的满意度时,14名患者中有13名对手术结果非常满意。结论在TFCC完好的情况下,反向晶圆手术是治疗尺侧嵌塞综合征的另一种选择。这种技术的中期结果是有希望的。然而,需要进一步的比较研究和更长的随访来支持这些发现。证据水平IV治疗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信