Art and linguistic bodies: a transformative view

IF 2 1区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1007/s11097-023-09948-5

Ståle Finke, Thomas Netland, Mattias Solli

{"title":"Art and linguistic bodies: a transformative view","authors":"Ståle Finke, Thomas Netland, Mattias Solli","doi":"10.1007/s11097-023-09948-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article takes its point of departure from the second (embodied) linguistic turn represented by the enactivist notion of humans as linguistic bodies, using resources from Hans Georg Gadamer in order to propose a view of the relation between art and everyday experience as one of symbolic transformation. Conceiving art as a form of linguistic phenomenon wherein one can engage in original situations of communication, this view rejects both autonomist and direct continuity views of the art-everyday relation. We start by situating the idea of linguistic bodies within the enactive approach, spelling out relevant aspects concerning the significance of language for human life and perception (Sect. 2). Then we embark on a discussion of aspects of Shaun Gallagher’s and Alva Noë’s enactivist perspectives on art experience, highlighting places where their views align with and depart from ours (Sect. 3). The last two sections aim to lay out the transformative view in more detail, proposing a pluralistic understanding of art media and a view of art and art experience as modes of ideational, embodied thought (Sects. 4 and 5).","PeriodicalId":51504,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-023-09948-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article takes its point of departure from the second (embodied) linguistic turn represented by the enactivist notion of humans as linguistic bodies, using resources from Hans Georg Gadamer in order to propose a view of the relation between art and everyday experience as one of symbolic transformation. Conceiving art as a form of linguistic phenomenon wherein one can engage in original situations of communication, this view rejects both autonomist and direct continuity views of the art-everyday relation. We start by situating the idea of linguistic bodies within the enactive approach, spelling out relevant aspects concerning the significance of language for human life and perception (Sect. 2). Then we embark on a discussion of aspects of Shaun Gallagher’s and Alva Noë’s enactivist perspectives on art experience, highlighting places where their views align with and depart from ours (Sect. 3). The last two sections aim to lay out the transformative view in more detail, proposing a pluralistic understanding of art media and a view of art and art experience as modes of ideational, embodied thought (Sects. 4 and 5).

查看原文本刊更多论文

艺术与语言体:一种变革性的观点

本文从以人作为语言主体的激进主义观念为代表的第二次(具身的)语言转向出发，借鉴伽达默尔的观点，提出一种艺术与日常经验关系的象征转换观。这种观点将艺术视为一种语言现象，人们可以在其中参与原始的交流情境，这一观点拒绝了艺术-日常关系的自主主义和直接连续性观点。我们首先将语言主体的概念置于行动方法中，阐明有关语言对人类生活和感知的意义的相关方面(第2节)。然后我们开始讨论Shaun Gallagher和Alva Noë对艺术经验的行动主义观点，突出他们的观点与我们的观点一致或偏离的地方(第3节)。最后两个部分旨在更详细地阐述变革观点。提出对艺术媒体的多元理解，并将艺术和艺术体验视为观念化、具体化的思维模式(第4节和第5节)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

8.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences is an interdisciplinary, international journal that serves as a forum to explore the intersections between phenomenology, empirical science, and analytic philosophy of mind. The journal represents an attempt to build bridges between continental phenomenological approaches (in the tradition following Husserl) and disciplines that have not always been open to or aware of phenomenological contributions to understanding cognition and related topics. The journal welcomes contributions by phenomenologists, scientists, and philosophers who study cognition, broadly defined to include issues that are open to both phenomenological and empirical investigation, including perception, emotion, language, and so forth. In addition the journal welcomes discussions of methodological issues that involve the variety of approaches appropriate for addressing these problems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences also publishes critical review articles that address recent work in areas relevant to the connection between empirical results in experimental science and first-person perspective.Double-blind review procedure The journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. Authors are therefore requested to place their name and affiliation on a separate page. Self-identifying citations and references in the article text should either be avoided or left blank when manuscripts are first submitted. Authors are responsible for reinserting self-identifying citations and references when manuscripts are prepared for final submission.